Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*XFS\s+filesystem\s+reports\s+as\s+full\s+though\s+it\s+isn\'t\s*$/: 39 ]

Total 39 documents matching your query.

1. md array (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 22:27:55 +0200
I have a 64 bits (x86_64) machine running Linux 2.6.22.19 with a 24TB XFS filesystem. There are some 15TB of data on it. All is well, no error except that I can't create a single file (touch foo : no
/archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00227.html (10,147 bytes)

2. messages (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 14:45:30 +0200
Le Fri, 16 May 2008 22:27:55 +0200 vous écriviez: One important thing I forgot to mention : some time before I have extended the FS from 16 to 24 TB, the FS got filled up commpletely (186MB free!!!
/archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00245.html (9,092 bytes)

3. ial files (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 09:18:55 -0400
The -a 0 means you're only looking at the first AG, which given the history of the filesystem has a fair chance to be full. To get the summary for all AG do a xfs_db -r -c 'freesp -s' /dev/vg0/lv0 No
/archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00248.html (10,044 bytes)

4. it isn't (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 09:21:27 -0400
Oh, and please post the output of /proc/self/mounts to see if all expected mount options are actualy seen by the filesystem.
/archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00249.html (9,684 bytes)

5. it isn't (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 15:42:08 +0200
Le Sun, 18 May 2008 09:21:27 -0400 vous écriviez: IIRC I tried both, however I'll double check monday... OK, thanks. -- -- Emmanuel Florac www.intellique.com -
/archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00250.html (9,885 bytes)

6. ow_finish (score: 1)
Author: )
Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 13:31:19 +0200
On my system I get "no space left on device" when I reach 99% full with about 20GB free space left on 2TB partitions. I also use sunit and swidth for the data section of the xfs filesystem, and it co
/archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00265.html (12,675 bytes)

7. it isn't (score: 1)
Author: x
Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 13:48:01 +0200
Both these 2TB partitions (A and B) were 99% full. Correction to last sentence: ... and I could copy the missing data _to_ partition B. Christian
/archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00266.html (13,477 bytes)

8. it isn't (score: 1)
Author: x
Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 22:10:57 +0200
Le Sun, 18 May 2008 15:42:08 +0200 vous écriviez: Well obviously I didn't try both, because it worked as expected when using "inode64". However there'ssomething slightly weird in the data layout: /
/archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00267.html (11,668 bytes)

9. it isn't (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 22:39:15 +0200
Le Mon, 19 May 2008 13:48:01 +0200 vous écriviez: Another reminder that we should always keep our disks less than 95ùfull :) -- -- Emmanuel Florac www.intellique.com --
/archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00268.html (9,448 bytes)

10. ->setattr (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 16:10:47 +1000
..... If there's no free space in AGs > 0 when you enable inode64, then you will still get enospc... ^^ AG This is typical of inode32 allocation... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner Principal Engineer SG
/archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00287.html (10,369 bytes)

11. ->setattr (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 12:17:33 +0200
Le Tue, 20 May 2008 16:10:47 +1000 David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx> écrivait: OK. I've mounted it "inode64" and apparently it worked fine. I started copying 6 more TB of data, I'll check how it goes thi
/archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00296.html (10,240 bytes)

12. it isn't (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 06:19:18 -0400
I've submitted a patch that should give back an error when remounting with an option not supported in remount, that should fix this little oversight in the future. Thanks for the report!
/archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00297.html (9,920 bytes)

13. messages (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 14:39:06 +0200
Le Tue, 20 May 2008 06:19:18 -0400 Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> écrivait: Thanks for the patch :) -- -- Emmanuel Florac | Intellique -
/archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00300.html (9,975 bytes)

14. S won't mount on partitioned md array (score: 1)
Author: xx>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 22:27:55 +0200
g size that it doesn't much
/archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00711.html (10,147 bytes)

15. on partitioned md array (score: 1)
Author: xx>
Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 14:45:30 +0200
ge sent to the list again..
/archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00729.html (9,092 bytes)

16. ize for directories and special files (score: 1)
Author: xx>
Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 09:18:55 -0400
we can remove xfs_validate_
/archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00732.html (10,044 bytes)

17. ystem reports as full though it isn't (score: 1)
Author: xx>
Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 09:21:27 -0400
'freesp -s' /dev/vg0/lv0 No
/archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00733.html (9,684 bytes)

18. ystem reports as full though it isn't (score: 1)
Author: xx>
Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 15:42:08 +0200
aly seen by the filesystem.
/archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00734.html (9,885 bytes)

19. xfs_igrow_start and xfs_igrow_finish (score: 1)
Author: er)
Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 13:31:19 +0200
onfusing comments. xfs_igro
/archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00749.html (12,675 bytes)

20. ystem reports as full though it isn't (score: 1)
Author: xxx
Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 13:48:01 +0200
e xfs filesystem, and it co
/archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00750.html (13,477 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu