Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*XFS\s+crash\s+on\s+linux\s+raid\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*XFS\s+crash\s+on\s+linux\s+raid\s*$/: 98 ]

Total 98 documents matching your query.

1. Re: XFS crash on linux raid (score: 1): Author:; Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 19:10:32 +0100; Several months ago, you posted a patch for 8k stacks together with irqstacks: Do you have a working version of your patch for 2.6.23? I've been using a similar patch (attached) for several years now; /archives/xfs/2007-11/msg00186.html (15,745 bytes)
2. Re: XFS crash on linux raid (score: 1): Author:; Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 15:44:15 -0800; I've posted it off and on for two or three years now -- quite a few people are using it or the equivalent of it, but thus far people resist merging this. The other idea (also nixed) that I posed was; /archives/xfs/2007-11/msg00188.html (8,990 bytes)
3. Re: XFS crash on linux raid (score: 1): Author:; Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 16:39:28 +0100; I'll take a look. Can you make sure it works with 8K stacks (more or less works). It works (more or less) fine without the patch that splits irqstacks from 4k stacks. (I tried it both with CONFIG_4KS; /archives/xfs/2007-11/msg00203.html (9,492 bytes)
4. Re: XFS crash on linux raid (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 19:10:32 +0100; Several months ago, you posted a patch for 8k stacks together with irqstacks: Do you have a working version of your patch for 2.6.23? I've been using a similar patch (attached) for several years now; /archives/xfs/2007-11/msg00502.html (15,745 bytes)
5. Re: XFS crash on linux raid (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 15:44:15 -0800; I've posted it off and on for two or three years now -- quite a few people are using it or the equivalent of it, but thus far people resist merging this. The other idea (also nixed) that I posed was; /archives/xfs/2007-11/msg00504.html (8,990 bytes)
6. Re: XFS crash on linux raid (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 16:39:28 +0100; I'll take a look. Can you make sure it works with 8K stacks (more or less works). It works (more or less) fine without the patch that splits irqstacks from 4k stacks. (I tried it both with CONFIG_4KS; /archives/xfs/2007-11/msg00519.html (9,492 bytes)
7. Re: XFS crash on linux raid (score: 1): Author: richid <rich.schu@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 21:07:30 -0700 (PDT); Can you update us on the status? Not to thread hijack, but I am having the same problem on my fileserver. Searched all over and can't seem to find a definitive answer. -- View this message in context; /archives/xfs/2007-07/msg00342.html (8,525 bytes)
8. Re: XFS crash on linux raid (score: 1): Author: richid <rich.schu@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 21:07:30 -0700 (PDT); Can you update us on the status? Not to thread hijack, but I am having the same problem on my fileserver. Searched all over and can't seem to find a definitive answer. -- View this message in context; /archives/xfs/2007-07/msg00705.html (8,525 bytes)
9. XFS crash on linux raid (score: 1): Author: Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 16:45:21 +0200; Apparently quite a lot of people do encounter the same problem from time to time, but I couldn't find any solution. When writing quite a lot to the filesystem (heavy load on the fileserver), the fil; /archives/xfs/2007-05/msg00025.html (14,885 bytes)
10. Re: XFS crash on linux raid (score: 1): Author: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 16:02:02 -0700; 4K stacks? You could try "mount -o nobarrier ...."; /archives/xfs/2007-05/msg00026.html (8,436 bytes)
11. Re: XFS crash on linux raid (score: 1): Author: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 10:59:22 +1000; So, trying to remove an inode there was a corruption found on disk and it shut the filesystem down. Where there any I/o errors reported before the shutdown? Which was found again during log recovery.; /archives/xfs/2007-05/msg00027.html (12,288 bytes)
12. Re: XFS crash on linux raid (score: 1): Author: Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 09:06:13 +0200; Le Fri, 4 May 2007 10:59:22 +1000 vous écriviez: Nope. To make it clear : the problem can be reproduce on several different systems, different motherboards, different drives, different RAID control; /archives/xfs/2007-05/msg00039.html (10,425 bytes)
13. Re: XFS crash on linux raid (score: 1): Author: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 17:33:44 +1000; Well, there's your problem. Stack overflows. IMO, if you use a filesystem, you shouldn't use 4k stacks. ;) If you remake you kernel with 8k stacks then your problems will most likely go away. Cheers,; /archives/xfs/2007-05/msg00040.html (9,404 bytes)
14. Re: XFS crash on linux raid (score: 1): Author: Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 15:25:46 +0200; Le Fri, 4 May 2007 17:33:44 +1000 David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx> écrivait: Well, I've double-checked the asm-i386/module.h, and it actually looks like 4K stacks is NOT the default, so I must be using; /archives/xfs/2007-05/msg00041.html (10,013 bytes)
15. Re: XFS crash on linux raid (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 09:55:30 -0500; Emmanuel Florac wrote: Le Fri, 4 May 2007 17:33:44 +1000 David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx> écrivait: Well, there's your problem. Stack overflows. IMO, if you use a filesystem, you shouldn't use 4k stacks; /archives/xfs/2007-05/msg00042.html (10,506 bytes)
16. Re: XFS crash on linux raid (score: 1): Author: Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 17:30:49 +0200; Le Fri, 04 May 2007 09:55:30 -0500 Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> écrivait: config-2.6.17.13: So the problem lies elsewhere... -- -- Emmanuel Florac | Intellique -; /archives/xfs/2007-05/msg00043.html (10,592 bytes)
17. Re: XFS crash on linux raid (score: 1): Author: Martin Steigerwald <Martin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 17:58:21 +0200; Am Freitag 04 Mai 2007 schrieb Emmanuel Florac: Hello Emmanuel! When you can't use write barriers as XFS tell you in the logs, you better switch of write caching for the harddisks / raid controller,; /archives/xfs/2007-05/msg00044.html (10,591 bytes)
18. Re: XFS crash on linux raid (score: 1): Author: Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 23:43:57 +0200; Le Fri, 4 May 2007 17:58:21 +0200 vous écriviez: Unfortunately ext3 doesn't support volumes bigger than 8TB, so that's useless to me. I plan to test jfs, however. I think it's more a dm/md issue, b; /archives/xfs/2007-05/msg00045.html (10,278 bytes)
19. Re: XFS crash on linux raid (score: 1): Author: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 16:20:28 -0700; CONFIG_4KSTACKS is badly named. It means you have 4K process + 4K interrupt stacks. Without this set you have just a single 8K stack for processes and interrupts. One argument for 4K+4K stacks is tha; /archives/xfs/2007-05/msg00046.html (15,244 bytes)
20. Re: XFS crash on linux raid (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 23:49:28 -0500; Emmanuel Florac wrote: Le Fri, 4 May 2007 17:58:21 +0200 vous écriviez: Did you test with ext3 as well? You wrote it crashes with ReiserFS (version 3) even faster. When it crashes with several file; /archives/xfs/2007-05/msg00047.html (10,862 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]