Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*XFS\s+corruption\s+on\s+move\s+from\s+xscale\s+to\s+i686\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*XFS\s+corruption\s+on\s+move\s+from\s+xscale\s+to\s+i686\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. Re: XFS corruption on move from xscale to i686 (score: 1): Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2005 14:21:46 +1000; Someone else was doing this awhile back, and also had issues. Their trouble seemed to be related to xscale gcc miscompiling parts of XFS - search the linux-xfs archives for details. cheers. -- Nathan; /archives/xfs/2005-07/msg00039.html (8,570 bytes)
2. Re: XFS corruption on move from xscale to i686 (score: 1): Author: Yura Pakhuchiy <pakhuchiy@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 18:22:28 +0300; 2005/7/8, Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>: I found patch by Greg Ungreger to fix this problem, but why it's still not in mainline? Or it's a gcc problem and should be fixed by gcc folks? BTW, my kerne; /archives/xfs/2005-07/msg00077.html (9,749 bytes)
3. Re: XFS corruption on move from xscale to i686 (score: 1): Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 11:20:48 +1000; Yes, IIRC the patch was incorrect for other platforms, and it sure looked like an arm-specific gcc problem (this was ages back, so perhaps its fixed by now). cheers. -- Nathan; /archives/xfs/2005-07/msg00081.html (8,694 bytes)
4. Re: XFS corruption on move from xscale to i686 (score: 1): Author: Yura Pakhuchiy <pakhuchiy@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 16:50:01 +0300; 2005/7/14, Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>: AFAIR gcc-3.4.3 was released after this conversation take place at linux-xfs, maybe add something like this: /* We need this because some gcc versions for x; /archives/xfs/2005-07/msg00088.html (9,939 bytes)
5. Re: XFS corruption on move from xscale to i686 (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 15:38:30 +0100; no, just fix your compiler or let the gcc folks do it. Did anyone of the arm folks ever open a PR at the gcc bugzilla with a reproduced testcase? You're never get your compiler fixed with that attitu; /archives/xfs/2005-07/msg00089.html (10,714 bytes)
6. Re: XFS corruption on move from xscale to i686 (score: 1): Author: Yura Pakhuchiy <pakhuchiy@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 17:45:15 +0300; 2005/7/14, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: Yes, but a lof of people use older versions of compilers and suffer from this bug. I personally was very unhappy when lost my data. Best regards, Yur; /archives/xfs/2005-07/msg00090.html (11,056 bytes)
7. Re: XFS corruption on move from xscale to i686 (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 15:49:19 +0100; then host the patch somewhere and make sure to apply it.; /archives/xfs/2005-07/msg00091.html (9,969 bytes)
8. Re: XFS corruption on move from xscale to i686 (score: 1): Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2005 14:21:46 +1000; Someone else was doing this awhile back, and also had issues. Their trouble seemed to be related to xscale gcc miscompiling parts of XFS - search the linux-xfs archives for details. cheers. -- Nathan; /archives/xfs/2005-07/msg00179.html (8,570 bytes)
9. Re: XFS corruption on move from xscale to i686 (score: 1): Author: Yura Pakhuchiy <pakhuchiy@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 18:22:28 +0300; 2005/7/8, Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>: I found patch by Greg Ungreger to fix this problem, but why it's still not in mainline? Or it's a gcc problem and should be fixed by gcc folks? BTW, my kerne; /archives/xfs/2005-07/msg00217.html (9,749 bytes)
10. Re: XFS corruption on move from xscale to i686 (score: 1): Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 11:20:48 +1000; Yes, IIRC the patch was incorrect for other platforms, and it sure looked like an arm-specific gcc problem (this was ages back, so perhaps its fixed by now). cheers. -- Nathan; /archives/xfs/2005-07/msg00221.html (8,694 bytes)
11. Re: XFS corruption on move from xscale to i686 (score: 1): Author: Yura Pakhuchiy <pakhuchiy@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 16:50:01 +0300; 2005/7/14, Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>: AFAIR gcc-3.4.3 was released after this conversation take place at linux-xfs, maybe add something like this: /* We need this because some gcc versions for x; /archives/xfs/2005-07/msg00228.html (9,939 bytes)
12. Re: XFS corruption on move from xscale to i686 (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 15:38:30 +0100; no, just fix your compiler or let the gcc folks do it. Did anyone of the arm folks ever open a PR at the gcc bugzilla with a reproduced testcase? You're never get your compiler fixed with that attitu; /archives/xfs/2005-07/msg00229.html (10,714 bytes)
13. Re: XFS corruption on move from xscale to i686 (score: 1): Author: Yura Pakhuchiy <pakhuchiy@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 17:45:15 +0300; 2005/7/14, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: Yes, but a lof of people use older versions of compilers and suffer from this bug. I personally was very unhappy when lost my data. Best regards, Yur; /archives/xfs/2005-07/msg00230.html (11,056 bytes)
14. Re: XFS corruption on move from xscale to i686 (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 15:49:19 +0100; then host the patch somewhere and make sure to apply it.; /archives/xfs/2005-07/msg00231.html (9,969 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]