Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*XFS\s+corruption\s+on\s+3ware\s+RAID6\-volume\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. XFS corruption on 3ware RAID6-volume (score: 1)
Author: Erik Gulliksson <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 14:27:27 +0100
Dear XFS people, I have bumped in to a corruption problem with one a XFS filesystems. The filesystem lives on a RAID6-volume on a 3ware 9650SE-24M8 with battery backup and writecache enabled. RAID6-c
/archives/xfs/2011-02/msg00226.html (16,923 bytes)

2. Re: XFS corruption on 3ware RAID6-volume (score: 1)
Author: Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 15:46:51 +0100
Le Wed, 23 Feb 2011 14:27:27 +0100 Erik Gulliksson <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> écrivait: What firmware version are you using? ( tw_cli /cX show firmware ) Augh. That sounds pretty bad. What does " tw_cli /
/archives/xfs/2011-02/msg00227.html (8,837 bytes)

3. Re: XFS corruption on 3ware RAID6-volume (score: 1)
Author: Erik Gulliksson <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 16:01:09 +0100
Hi Emmanuel, Thanks for your prompt reply. /c0 Firmware Version = FE9X 4.10.00.007 Yes, it is bad - a decision has been made to replace these disks with "enterprise"-versions (without TLER/ERC proble
/archives/xfs/2011-02/msg00228.html (10,219 bytes)

4. Re: XFS corruption on 3ware RAID6-volume (score: 1)
Author: Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 16:23:16 +0100
Le Wed, 23 Feb 2011 16:01:09 +0100 Erik Gulliksson <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> écrivait: OK so this is the latest, or close. Typical error, alas. Save a couple hundred euros with cheap drives, to store ter
/archives/xfs/2011-02/msg00229.html (11,375 bytes)

5. Re: XFS corruption on 3ware RAID6-volume (score: 1)
Author: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 10:29:15 -0500 (EST)
Hi Emmanuel, Thanks for your prompt reply. What firmware version are you using? ( tw_cli /cX show firmware ) /c0 Firmware Version = FE9X 4.10.00.007 The latest is: 9.5.1-9650-Upgrade.zip 9.5.2-9650-
/archives/xfs/2011-02/msg00230.html (12,114 bytes)

6. Re: XFS corruption on 3ware RAID6-volume (score: 1)
Author: Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 16:37:37 +0100
Le Wed, 23 Feb 2011 10:29:15 -0500 (EST) Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> écrivait: Hum well, this is beta, I'd rather stick to released firmware :) His firmware is actually the latest stable
/archives/xfs/2011-02/msg00231.html (9,514 bytes)

7. Re: XFS corruption on 3ware RAID6-volume (score: 1)
Author: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 10:42:17 -0500 (EST)
Le Wed, 23 Feb 2011 10:29:15 -0500 (EST) Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> écrivait: /c0 Firmware Version = FE9X 4.10.00.007 The latest is: 9.5.1-9650-Upgrade.zip 9.5.2-9650-Upgrade.zip 9.5.3-
/archives/xfs/2011-02/msg00232.html (10,704 bytes)

8. Re: XFS corruption on 3ware RAID6-volume (score: 1)
Author: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 10:56:49 -0600
Erik Gulliksson put forth on 2/23/2011 7:27 AM: There is a reason WD has an enterprise line of drives for use in RAID applications. The EARS series, along with the entire WD desktop drive series, are
/archives/xfs/2011-02/msg00235.html (9,371 bytes)

9. Re: XFS corruption on 3ware RAID6-volume (score: 1)
Author: Erik Gulliksson <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 11:20:26 +0100
Thanks for your comments Emmanuel. No I meant it is "OK" with "O" :) The server has been restarted since the problems started, so nothing notable in "tw_cli alarms" or dmesg. The controller was perfo
/archives/xfs/2011-02/msg00259.html (10,313 bytes)

10. Re: XFS corruption on 3ware RAID6-volume (score: 1)
Author: Erik Gulliksson <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 11:25:53 +0100
Hi Justin, I think I'll stick with changing the disks with enterprise-versions. There might be other reasons why 3ware/LSI still has those firmware fixes in beta. Best regards Erik Gulliksson
/archives/xfs/2011-02/msg00260.html (10,738 bytes)

11. Re: XFS corruption on 3ware RAID6-volume (score: 1)
Author: Erik Gulliksson <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 11:35:30 +0100
Hi again Justin, This is valuable information, we might consider Hitatchi-disks next time if we want to play cheap again. No, I don't have full filename-inode mappings from before the corruption. I g
/archives/xfs/2011-02/msg00261.html (10,354 bytes)

12. Re: XFS corruption on 3ware RAID6-volume (score: 1)
Author: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 06:01:42 -0500 (EST)
Hi again Justin, This would seem to be the problem, you should go with Hiatchi next time. You can use regular non-enterprise drives (Hiatchi) and they just work. Seagate is a question Samsung is a q
/archives/xfs/2011-02/msg00262.html (11,199 bytes)

13. Re: XFS corruption on 3ware RAID6-volume (score: 1)
Author: Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 13:14:11 +0100
Le Thu, 24 Feb 2011 11:35:30 +0100 Erik Gulliksson <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> écrivait: Your best bet is to try booting a bleeding-edge kernel with the very latest xfs version. It could possibly go somewh
/archives/xfs/2011-02/msg00263.html (9,923 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu