Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*XFS\s+breakage\s+in\s+2\.6\.18\-rc1\s*$/: 60 ]

Total 60 documents matching your query.

41. Re: XFS breakage in 2.6.18-rc1 (score: 1)
Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 08:57:31 +1000
Hi Torsten, I suspect you had some residual directory corruption from using the 2.6.17 XFS (which is known to have a lurking dir2 corruption issue, fixed in the latest -stable point release). 2.6.18-
/archives/xfs/2006-07/msg00960.html (9,454 bytes)

42. Re: XFS breakage in 2.6.18-rc1 (score: 1)
Author: Alistair John Strachan <s0348365@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 09:08:30 +0100
Just out of interest, I've got a few XFS volumes that were created 24 months ago on a machine that I upgraded to 2.6.17 about a month ago. I haven't seen any crashes so far. Assuming I get the newest
/archives/xfs/2006-07/msg00968.html (9,788 bytes)

43. Re: XFS breakage in 2.6.18-rc1 (score: 1)
Author: Kasper Sandberg <lkml@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 12:21:08 +0200
This has me very worried. i just upgraded to .18-rc1-git5 when it came out, i used .17-rc3 before. does this mean my .17-rc3 may have corrupted my filesystem? what action do you suggest i do now?
/archives/xfs/2006-07/msg00973.html (10,448 bytes)

44. Re: XFS breakage in 2.6.18-rc1 (score: 1)
Author: Alistair John Strachan <s0348365@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 13:43:33 +0100
According to another thread Nathan just responded to, it sounds like we need to wait for a new version of the xfsprogs package, and then run xfs_repair on the affected filesystems. I wouldn't worry a
/archives/xfs/2006-07/msg00975.html (11,834 bytes)

45. Re: XFS breakage in 2.6.18-rc1 (score: 1)
Author: Kasper Sandberg <lkml@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 17:25:26 +0200
without ANY loss? because even though it would be abit painful for me to do, i do have the option of smashing in a new drive, copy everything, and reinitialize my filesystem. so basically if i upgrad
/archives/xfs/2006-07/msg00979.html (12,479 bytes)

46. Re: XFS breakage in 2.6.18-rc1 (score: 1)
Author: Torsten Landschoff <torsten@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 23:14:02 +0200
Hi Nathan, That probably the cause of my problem. Thanks for the info! BTW: I think there was nothing important on the broken filesystems, but I'd like to keep what's still there anyway just in case.
/archives/xfs/2006-07/msg00981.html (10,773 bytes)

47. Re: XFS breakage in 2.6.18-rc1 (score: 1)
Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 08:56:36 +1000
There should be no disadvantage to repairing. I will update the FAQ shortly to describe all the details of the problem, recommendations on how to address it, which kernel version is affected, etc. ch
/archives/xfs/2006-07/msg00982.html (10,501 bytes)

48. Re: XFS breakage in 2.6.18-rc1 (score: 1)
Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 08:59:04 +1000
The odds are decent that you're unaffected. You can check your filesystem using xfs_check or xfs_repair -n and these will give you a good indication as to whether further action is required. cheers.
/archives/xfs/2006-07/msg00983.html (11,171 bytes)

49. Re: XFS breakage in 2.6.18-rc1 (score: 1)
Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 09:01:09 +1000
Erm, wha..? Can you expand on "annihilated" a bit? (please send me the full xfs_repair output if you still have it). thanks. -- Nathan
/archives/xfs/2006-07/msg00984.html (9,331 bytes)

50. Re: XFS breakage in 2.6.18-rc1 (score: 1)
Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 09:09:45 +1000
Yeah, xfsdumps not a bad idea, the interfaces it uses may well be able to avoid the cases that trigger shutdown. Otherwise it is a case of identifying the problem directory inode (the inum is reporte
/archives/xfs/2006-07/msg00985.html (11,307 bytes)

51. Re: XFS breakage in 2.6.18-rc1 (score: 1)
Author: Jeffrey Hundstad <jeffrey.hundstad@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 00:51:22 -0500
Nathan Scott wrote: On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 09:59:33AM -0500, Jeffrey E. Hundstad wrote: I did try the xfs_repair 2.8.4 for a volume running on 2.6.17.4 and it annihilated the volume. This volume was
/archives/xfs/2006-07/msg00988.html (10,457 bytes)

52. Re: XFS breakage in 2.6.18-rc1 (score: 1)
Author: Kasper Sandberg <lkml@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 12:29:02 +0200
this FAQ, is it this: http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/faq.html#dir2 ? (btw, it seems that while only in the TOC once, you have the same about 2.6.17 twice..).. which version of xfsprogs should i use
/archives/xfs/2006-07/msg01000.html (11,253 bytes)

53. Re: XFS breakage in 2.6.18-rc1 (score: 1)
Author: Christian Kujau <evil@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 17:27:24 +0100 (BST)
Hi folks, well, at least for me, corruption/errors *started* with 2.6.18-rc1: http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2006-07/msg00151.html I downgraded to 2.6.17.5 and the errors stopped. Now I've upgraded
/archives/xfs/2006-07/msg01051.html (10,953 bytes)

54. Re: XFS breakage in 2.6.18-rc1 (score: 1)
Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 09:01:38 +1000
This is an ondisk corruption - downgrading the kernel will not resolve it. The problem must be triggered by a combination of operations on a directory; I'm certain that if you access inode 24472381 o
/archives/xfs/2006-07/msg01061.html (10,983 bytes)

55. Re: XFS breakage in 2.6.18-rc1 (score: 1)
Author: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 22:16:10 +0200 (MEST)
Now that 2.6.17.7 is finally there, I am going to eyeball my XFS filesystems. Does xfsprogs 2.7.11 suffice? Please update the XFS FAQ about this problem (and the solution, for others that did not rea
/archives/xfs/2006-07/msg01092.html (9,897 bytes)

56. Re: XFS breakage in 2.6.18-rc1 (score: 1)
Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 09:10:50 +1000
Sure, except for the repair issue which Barry is working on (see the FAQ). That was done last week. You shoulda read it before sending this, and saved me some time replying. ;) cheers. -- Nathan
/archives/xfs/2006-07/msg01096.html (10,481 bytes)

57. Re: XFS breakage in 2.6.18-rc1 (score: 1)
Author: Christian Kujau <evil@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 17:01:24 +0000 (UTC)
Hello again, I had two xfs filesystems and I first noticed that /data/Scratch was befallen from this bug. I did not care much about this (hence the name :)) and I wanted to postpone the xfs_db surger
/archives/xfs/2006-07/msg01131.html (11,267 bytes)

58. Re: XFS breakage in 2.6.18-rc1 (score: 1)
Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 07:48:03 +1000
Barry sent an xfs_repair patch to resolve this issue to the xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx list yesterday; please give that a go and let us know how it fares. cheers. -- Nathan
/archives/xfs/2006-07/msg01134.html (10,446 bytes)

59. Re: XFS breakage in 2.6.18-rc1 (score: 1)
Author: Ralf Hildebrandt <Ralf.Hildebrandt@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 22:22:24 +0200
* Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>: Just to let you know, I did a cvs checkout of xfs-cmds as described on http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/source.html Then I saved the patch from http://oss.sgi.com/arc
/archives/xfs/2006-07/msg01142.html (11,491 bytes)

60. Re: XFS breakage in 2.6.18-rc1 (score: 1)
Author: David Chatterton <chatz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 08:28:05 +1000
The bug is fixed in 2.6.17.7. David
/archives/xfs/2006-07/msg01145.html (11,256 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu