Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*XFS\s+at\s+all\?\s+AND\s+XFS\s+and\s+gcc\s+\?\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*XFS\s+at\s+all\?\s+AND\s+XFS\s+and\s+gcc\s+\?\!\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. Re: XFS at all? AND XFS and gcc ?! (score: 1): Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 07:14:56 +0200; Thanks for your fast and long answer! Did you hear something about XFS over Software-RAID5? I ment XFS over software Raid5. Hardware raid practically always works unless the hardware raid driver is b; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg00612.html (12,051 bytes)
2. Re: XFS at all? AND XFS and gcc ?! (score: 1): Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 22:58:17 +0200 (CEST); I use XFS on my home system since the 2.4.0-test kernels came out and have not suffered data as of yet. (knock on wood). I have no expierence about XFS over Raid5. I have the number of disks for it b; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg00763.html (11,318 bytes)
3. XFS at all? AND XFS and gcc ?! (score: 1): Author: Knuth Posern <posern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 21:25:22 +0200 (MET DST); I would like to build a Software RAID-5. I don't have a backup of my data (because it is too much data and backup-solutions are too expansive for a student). That's why I want to use a Software-RAID; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg00764.html (11,377 bytes)
4. Re: XFS at all? AND XFS and gcc ?! (score: 1): Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 16:37:36 +0200; It's very simple: Software or any RAID is definitely not a replacement for backups. If you care about your data, always backup it. If you don't care about it feel free to use experimental software to; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg00766.html (8,593 bytes)
5. Re: XFS at all? AND XFS and gcc ?! (score: 1): Author: Thomas Duffy <tduffy@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: 21 Jun 2001 12:37:22 -0700; I have a 180G RAID 5 array with xfs that spans 12 disks. It has been serving ~50 clients daily without reboot for 4 months and no corruption. I even had one disk go bad, replaced it an the array was; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg00788.html (8,462 bytes)
6. Re: XFS at all? AND XFS and gcc ?! (score: 1): Author: Juha Saarinen <juha@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 08:28:37 +1200 (NZST); 2.96 -{81|85} have both produced file system corruption for me On RH, you'll need the compat-egcs packages, plus the compat-libs one. -- Juha; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg00789.html (8,867 bytes)
7. Re: XFS at all? AND XFS and gcc ?! (score: 1): Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 07:14:56 +0200; Thanks for your fast and long answer! Did you hear something about XFS over Software-RAID5? I ment XFS over software Raid5. Hardware raid practically always works unless the hardware raid driver is b; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg01782.html (12,051 bytes)
8. Re: XFS at all? AND XFS and gcc ?! (score: 1): Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 22:58:17 +0200 (CEST); I use XFS on my home system since the 2.4.0-test kernels came out and have not suffered data as of yet. (knock on wood). I have no expierence about XFS over Raid5. I have the number of disks for it b; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg01933.html (11,318 bytes)
9. XFS at all? AND XFS and gcc ?! (score: 1): Author: Knuth Posern <posern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 21:25:22 +0200 (MET DST); I would like to build a Software RAID-5. I don't have a backup of my data (because it is too much data and backup-solutions are too expansive for a student). That's why I want to use a Software-RAID; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg01934.html (11,377 bytes)
10. Re: XFS at all? AND XFS and gcc ?! (score: 1): Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 16:37:36 +0200; It's very simple: Software or any RAID is definitely not a replacement for backups. If you care about your data, always backup it. If you don't care about it feel free to use experimental software to; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg01936.html (8,593 bytes)
11. Re: XFS at all? AND XFS and gcc ?! (score: 1): Author: Thomas Duffy <tduffy@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: 21 Jun 2001 12:37:22 -0700; I have a 180G RAID 5 array with xfs that spans 12 disks. It has been serving ~50 clients daily without reboot for 4 months and no corruption. I even had one disk go bad, replaced it an the array was; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg01958.html (8,462 bytes)
12. Re: XFS at all? AND XFS and gcc ?! (score: 1): Author: Juha Saarinen <juha@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 08:28:37 +1200 (NZST); 2.96 -{81|85} have both produced file system corruption for me On RH, you'll need the compat-egcs packages, plus the compat-libs one. -- Juha; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg01959.html (8,867 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]