Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*XFS\s+and\s+LBD\s+patch\s+on\s+2\.4\.20\s+or\s+2\.4\.22\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*XFS\s+and\s+LBD\s+patch\s+on\s+2\.4\.20\s+or\s+2\.4\.22\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. XFS and LBD patch on 2.4.20 or 2.4.22 (score: 1): Author: Gustavo Rincon <grincon@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 14:43:06 -0600; Hi guys, I have a XFS 1.3.1 version compile on linux kernel-2.4.20 (Red Hat version) and kernel-2.4.22 (Vanilla) and i was wonder what changes I have to do to xfsprogs in order to create and support; /archives/xfs/2003-11/msg00197.html (7,869 bytes)
2. Re: XFS and LBD patch on 2.4.20 or 2.4.22 (score: 1): Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 08:03:56 +1100; hi there, None. There are changes in this area in CVS - could you try a current CVS kernel. Also, can you describe your tests in detail, and if the problem reproducible for you? (if so, hopefully it; /archives/xfs/2003-11/msg00198.html (9,149 bytes)
3. Re: XFS and LBD patch on 2.4.20 or 2.4.22 (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>; Date: 24 Nov 2003 15:19:01 -0600; Also, please make sure your LBD patch defines HAVE_SECTOR_T - Peter's patch link was out of date for a while, the XFS code keys off that in 2.4 to know whether the LBD patch is present. -Eric -- Eric; /archives/xfs/2003-11/msg00199.html (8,282 bytes)
4. RE: XFS and LBD patch on 2.4.20 or 2.4.22 (score: 1): Author: Gustavo Rincon <grincon@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 08:32:15 -0600; Well for this test I'm using kernel-2.4.22 plus a version of the lbd patch (linux-2.4.28-18-rh-lbd.path took from the SGI ftp, i don't know if this patch is still available on the SGI ftp) and SGI XF; /archives/xfs/2003-11/msg00204.html (13,906 bytes)
5. RE: XFS and LBD patch on 2.4.20 or 2.4.22 (score: 1): Author: Gustavo Rincon <grincon@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 08:34:33 -0600; Well for this test I'm using kernel-2.4.22 plus a version of the lbd patch (linux-2.4.28-18-rh-lbd.path took from the SGI ftp, i don't know if this patch is still available on the SGI ftp) and SGI XF; /archives/xfs/2003-11/msg00205.html (13,535 bytes)
6. XFS and LBD patch on 2.4.20 or 2.4.22 (score: 1): Author: Gustavo Rincon <grincon@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 14:43:06 -0600; Hi guys, I have a XFS 1.3.1 version compile on linux kernel-2.4.20 (Red Hat version) and kernel-2.4.22 (Vanilla) and i was wonder what changes I have to do to xfsprogs in order to create and support; /archives/xfs/2003-11/msg00458.html (7,869 bytes)
7. Re: XFS and LBD patch on 2.4.20 or 2.4.22 (score: 1): Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 08:03:56 +1100; hi there, None. There are changes in this area in CVS - could you try a current CVS kernel. Also, can you describe your tests in detail, and if the problem reproducible for you? (if so, hopefully it; /archives/xfs/2003-11/msg00459.html (9,149 bytes)
8. Re: XFS and LBD patch on 2.4.20 or 2.4.22 (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>; Date: 24 Nov 2003 15:19:01 -0600; Also, please make sure your LBD patch defines HAVE_SECTOR_T - Peter's patch link was out of date for a while, the XFS code keys off that in 2.4 to know whether the LBD patch is present. -Eric -- Eric; /archives/xfs/2003-11/msg00460.html (8,282 bytes)
9. RE: XFS and LBD patch on 2.4.20 or 2.4.22 (score: 1): Author: Gustavo Rincon <grincon@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 08:32:15 -0600; Well for this test I'm using kernel-2.4.22 plus a version of the lbd patch (linux-2.4.28-18-rh-lbd.path took from the SGI ftp, i don't know if this patch is still available on the SGI ftp) and SGI XF; /archives/xfs/2003-11/msg00465.html (13,906 bytes)
10. RE: XFS and LBD patch on 2.4.20 or 2.4.22 (score: 1): Author: Gustavo Rincon <grincon@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 08:34:33 -0600; Well for this test I'm using kernel-2.4.22 plus a version of the lbd patch (linux-2.4.28-18-rh-lbd.path took from the SGI ftp, i don't know if this patch is still available on the SGI ftp) and SGI XF; /archives/xfs/2003-11/msg00466.html (13,535 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]