- 1. XFS Minus the Journal (score: 1)
- Author: David Lloyd <lloy0076@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2001 16:06:59 +0930
- Weird question, and I could probably just "try", but is there any way to use XFS without the journal? DSL -- Pussy's good for six at the most (Mrs. Lovett, Sweeney Todd)
- /archives/xfs/2001-09/msg00027.html (6,395 bytes)
- 2. Re: XFS Minus the Journal (score: 1)
- Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 18:52:05 +1100
- No. There was a plan to do this (via a new mount option, IIRC) awhile ago to compare performance to non-journaled filesystems, but noone ever got around to it. cheers. -- Nathan
- /archives/xfs/2001-09/msg00032.html (7,391 bytes)
- 3. XFS Minus the Journal (score: 1)
- Author: >
- Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2001 16:06:59 +0930
- Weird question, and I could probably just "try", but is there any way to use XFS without the journal? DSL -- Pussy's good for six at the most (Mrs. Lovett, Sweeney Todd)
- /archives/xfs/2001-09/msg00705.html (6,395 bytes)
- 4. Re: XFS Minus the Journal (score: 1)
- Author: >
- Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 18:52:05 +1100
- No. There was a plan to do this (via a new mount option, IIRC) awhile ago to compare performance to non-journaled filesystems, but noone ever got around to it. cheers. -- Nathan
- /archives/xfs/2001-09/msg00710.html (7,391 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu