Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*XFS\s+1\.0\.1\s+SuSE\s+Port\s*$/: 27 ]

Total 27 documents matching your query.

1. XFS 1.0.1 SuSE Port (score: 1)
Author: xx>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 13:35:17 -0600
Has anyone attempted to get XFS working on SuSE? I need to get that going but don't want to invest time in something that's already been done.
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00989.html (7,822 bytes)

2. Re: XFS 1.0.1 SuSE Port (score: 1)
Author: xx>
Date: 20 Jul 2001 14:44:57 -0500
Several people are using XFS on SuSE-installed boxes, but with vanilla kernels, I believe. I don't know if anyone has made available RPMs of SuSE kernels with XFS merged in... -Eric -- Eric Sandeen X
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00990.html (8,501 bytes)

3. Re: XFS 1.0.1 SuSE Port (score: 1)
Author: xx>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 14:49:23 -0500
Andi Kleen lurks on this list, maybe he can answer this one. Steve
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00991.html (8,358 bytes)

4. Re: XFS 1.0.1 SuSE Port (score: 1)
Author: xx>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 21:45:43 +0000
The German "Linux Magazin" had an article on that in its July issue. They used SuSE 7.1 kernel 2.4.2 and used the patches for XFS 1.0. They reported one uncritical patch-reject and used gcc 2.95.2 (b
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01001.html (8,599 bytes)

5. Re: XFS 1.0.1 SuSE Port (score: 1)
Author: xx>
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2001 00:18:40 +0200
The German "Linux Magazin" had an article on that in its July issue. They used SuSE 7.1 kernel 2.4.2 and used the patches for XFS 1.0. They reported one uncritical patch-reject and used gcc 2.95.2 (b
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01003.html (9,218 bytes)

6. Re: XFS 1.0.1 SuSE Port (score: 1)
Author: xx>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 17:22:53 -0500
But that would give you Red Hat kernels on your SuSE system... I think what people may be looking for are SuSE kernels (w/ all their patches, etc) and XFS added on. Or maybe the original poster just
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01004.html (8,425 bytes)

7. Re: XFS 1.0.1 SuSE Port (score: 1)
Author: xx>
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2001 00:34:17 +0200
But that would give you Red Hat kernels on your SuSE system... I think what people may be looking for are SuSE kernels (w/ all their patches, etc) and XFS added on. Or maybe the original poster just
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01005.html (9,769 bytes)

8. Re: XFS 1.0.1 SuSE Port (score: 1)
Author: xx>
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2001 01:01:40 +0200
ftp.suse.com:/pub/people/ak/xfs/xfs-2.4.6-5.bz2 is a XFS patch against a recent SuSE kernel (slightly post 7.2). It should apply to the 2.4 kernel tree you find in ftp.suse.com:/pub/people/mantel/nex
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01006.html (8,674 bytes)

9. Re: XFS 1.0.1 SuSE Port (score: 1)
Author: xx>
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2001 09:36:09 +1000
This got fixed recently - I came across it by chance. You're the first person to actually report the problem, so thanks. This xfsprogs build problem exists in 1.0.1 too, but only if you - have liblv
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01010.html (9,503 bytes)

10. XFS 1.0.1 SuSE Port (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 13:35:17 -0600
Has anyone attempted to get XFS working on SuSE? I need to get that going but don't want to invest time in something that's already been done.
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg02280.html (7,822 bytes)

11. Re: XFS 1.0.1 SuSE Port (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: 20 Jul 2001 14:44:57 -0500
Several people are using XFS on SuSE-installed boxes, but with vanilla kernels, I believe. I don't know if anyone has made available RPMs of SuSE kernels with XFS merged in... -Eric -- Eric Sandeen X
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg02281.html (8,501 bytes)

12. Re: XFS 1.0.1 SuSE Port (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 14:49:23 -0500
Andi Kleen lurks on this list, maybe he can answer this one. Steve
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg02282.html (8,358 bytes)

13. Re: XFS 1.0.1 SuSE Port (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 21:45:43 +0000
The German "Linux Magazin" had an article on that in its July issue. They used SuSE 7.1 kernel 2.4.2 and used the patches for XFS 1.0. They reported one uncritical patch-reject and used gcc 2.95.2 (b
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg02292.html (8,599 bytes)

14. Re: XFS 1.0.1 SuSE Port (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2001 00:18:40 +0200
The German "Linux Magazin" had an article on that in its July issue. They used SuSE 7.1 kernel 2.4.2 and used the patches for XFS 1.0. They reported one uncritical patch-reject and used gcc 2.95.2 (b
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg02294.html (9,218 bytes)

15. Re: XFS 1.0.1 SuSE Port (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 17:22:53 -0500
But that would give you Red Hat kernels on your SuSE system... I think what people may be looking for are SuSE kernels (w/ all their patches, etc) and XFS added on. Or maybe the original poster just
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg02295.html (8,425 bytes)

16. Re: XFS 1.0.1 SuSE Port (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2001 00:34:17 +0200
But that would give you Red Hat kernels on your SuSE system... I think what people may be looking for are SuSE kernels (w/ all their patches, etc) and XFS added on. Or maybe the original poster just
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg02296.html (9,769 bytes)

17. Re: XFS 1.0.1 SuSE Port (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2001 01:01:40 +0200
ftp.suse.com:/pub/people/ak/xfs/xfs-2.4.6-5.bz2 is a XFS patch against a recent SuSE kernel (slightly post 7.2). It should apply to the 2.4 kernel tree you find in ftp.suse.com:/pub/people/mantel/nex
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg02297.html (8,674 bytes)

18. Re: XFS 1.0.1 SuSE Port (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2001 09:36:09 +1000
This got fixed recently - I came across it by chance. You're the first person to actually report the problem, so thanks. This xfsprogs build problem exists in 1.0.1 too, but only if you - have liblv
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg02301.html (9,503 bytes)

19. XFS 1.0.1 SuSE Port (score: 1)
Author: Dean Brissinger <brissing@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 13:35:17 -0600
Has anyone attempted to get XFS working on SuSE? I need to get that going but don't want to invest time in something that's already been done.
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg03571.html (7,927 bytes)

20. Re: XFS 1.0.1 SuSE Port (score: 1)
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date: 20 Jul 2001 14:44:57 -0500
Several people are using XFS on SuSE-installed boxes, but with vanilla kernels, I believe. I don't know if anyone has made available RPMs of SuSE kernels with XFS merged in... -Eric -- Eric Sandeen X
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg03572.html (8,663 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu