Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*XFS\:\s+accounting\s+of\s+reclaimable\s+inodes\s+is\s+incorrect\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*XFS\:\s+accounting\s+of\s+reclaimable\s+inodes\s+is\s+incorrect\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. XFS: accounting of reclaimable inodes is incorrect (score: 1): Author: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG <s.priebe@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 13:42:28 +0200; Hi, it seems that a bug was backported into the latest 2.6.32 longterm stable kernel. Now the patch "XFS: accounting of reclaimable inodes is incorrect" needs to get backported to 2.6.32. Who can hel; /archives/xfs/2011-06/msg00130.html (7,705 bytes)
2. Re: XFS: accounting of reclaimable inodes is incorrect (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 07:54:42 -0400; For -stable releases no one really is. If you want to help you can backport it and send it to the stable mailinglist.; /archives/xfs/2011-06/msg00131.html (8,437 bytes)
3. Re: XFS: accounting of reclaimable inodes is incorrect (score: 1): Author: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG <s.priebe@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 14:58:32 +0200; it seems that a bug was backported into the latest 2.6.32 longterm stable kernel. Now the patch "XFS: accounting of reclaimable inodes is incorrect" needs to get backported to 2.6.32. Who can help? W; /archives/xfs/2011-06/msg00134.html (9,210 bytes)
4. Re: XFS: accounting of reclaimable inodes is incorrect (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 09:34:29 -0400; Linux 2.6.32 isn't really something supported by us. It's not just a very old codebase, but also one where a lot of the XFS code was pretty much in flux. If you want supported old releases work use o; /archives/xfs/2011-06/msg00135.html (9,186 bytes)
5. Re: XFS: accounting of reclaimable inodes is incorrect (score: 1): Author: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG <s.priebe@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 15:48:38 +0200; Am 07.06.2011 15:34, schrieb Christoph Hellwig: On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 02:58:32PM +0200, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote: Linux 2.6.32 isn't really something supported by us. It's not just a very; /archives/xfs/2011-06/msg00136.html (9,997 bytes)
6. Re: XFS: accounting of reclaimable inodes is incorrect (score: 1): Author: Dave Howorth <dhoworth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 15:00:10 +0100; 2.6.32 is also the kernel in Ubuntu 10.04 LTS; /archives/xfs/2011-06/msg00137.html (8,761 bytes)
7. Re: XFS: accounting of reclaimable inodes is incorrect (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 10:09:49 -0400; I have no idea what the idea is, but it's clearly not viable for normal kernel developers. Backporting code to age old releases and QAing it is a major effort, and people generally don't do it unless; /archives/xfs/2011-06/msg00138.html (9,528 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]