Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*XFS\:\s+SB\s+validate\s+failed\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*XFS\:\s+SB\s+validate\s+failed\s*$/: 72 ]

Total 72 documents matching your query.

1. Re: XFS: SB validate failed (score: 1): Author: Hamid <spam.wax@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2008 03:35:36 -0400; I think you have the terminology a little mixed up. If you mount a something without supplying -o loop "mount" will assume the filesystem resides in a DEVICE. If you mount a something WHILE supplying; /archives/xfs/2008-06/msg00000.html (13,042 bytes)
2. Re: XFS: SB validate failed (score: 1): Author: Stefan Smietanowski <stesmi@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2008 12:46:06 +0200; Hamid wrote: I think you have the terminology a little mixed up. If you mount a something without supplying -o loop "mount" will assume the filesystem resides in a DEVICE. If you mount a something WH; /archives/xfs/2008-06/msg00002.html (13,105 bytes)
3. Re: XFS: SB validate failed (score: 1): Author: Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2008 12:08:42 +1000; If the fs is not too full then xfs_copy would be good I suppose as it won't copy freespace. --Tim; /archives/xfs/2008-06/msg00009.html (10,227 bytes)
4. Re: XFS: SB validate failed (score: 1): Author: "Spam Magnet" <spam.wax@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 13:36:26 -0400; I couldn't find any XFS by using the full dump of the disk: $ od -t c jaz7.img | grep X | head 0040000 353 > 220 ( j 0 X ] I H C \0 002 001 \0 0040240 003 303 H 367 363 001 F 374 021 N 376 Z X 273 \0; /archives/xfs/2008-06/msg00026.html (11,929 bytes)
5. Re: XFS: SB validate failed (score: 1): Author: "Spam Magnet" <spam.wax@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 13:56:08 -0400; Correcting my mistake: The healthy image file does have the X F S B at 10000000 (octal) as fdisk had reported: Pt# Device Info Start End Sectors Id System 8: 2gb-ubuntu.img1 4096 3915599 3911504 a S; /archives/xfs/2008-06/msg00027.html (11,012 bytes)
6. Re: XFS: SB validate failed (score: 1): Author: Stefan Smietanowski <stesmi@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2008 20:59:43 +0200; Spam Magnet wrote: (The healthy disk image also doesn't have any XFS but it has: 'S f x' (capital s)) Correcting my mistake: The healthy image file does have the X F S B at 10000000 (octal) as fdisk; /archives/xfs/2008-06/msg00029.html (10,722 bytes)
7. Re: XFS: SB validate failed (score: 1): Author: "Spam Magnet" <spam.wax@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 15:39:07 -0400; I think they are but I used -u option of fdisk: $ fdisk -ul jaz7.img Disk jaz7.img (SGI disk label): 255 heads, 63 sectors, 0 cylinders Units = sectors of 1 * 512 bytes -- partitions -- Pt# Device In; /archives/xfs/2008-06/msg00030.html (12,514 bytes)
8. Re: XFS: SB validate failed (score: 1): Author: Stefan Smietanowski <stesmi@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2008 22:23:51 +0200; Spam Magnet wrote: On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Stefan Smietanowski <stesmi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: Spam Magnet wrote: (The healthy disk image also doesn't have any XFS but it has: 'S f x' (capital s)); /archives/xfs/2008-06/msg00032.html (12,514 bytes)
9. Re: XFS: SB validate failed (score: 1): Author: "Spam Magnet" <spam.wax@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 12:16:17 -0400; 3072*2048=6,291,456 (30000000 octal) $ od -t c jaz7.img | grep 30000000 30000000 377 377 367 371 \0 \0 0 365 \0 \0 ? y \0 \0 004 016 130000000 201 244 \0 001 \0 \0 \0 \0 \0 \0 006 201 B 373 306 307 S; /archives/xfs/2008-06/msg00062.html (12,256 bytes)
10. Re: XFS: SB validate failed (score: 1): Author: Hamid <spam.wax@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2008 03:35:36 -0400; I think you have the terminology a little mixed up. If you mount a something without supplying -o loop "mount" will assume the filesystem resides in a DEVICE. If you mount a something WHILE supplying; /archives/xfs/2008-06/msg00460.html (13,042 bytes)
11. Re: XFS: SB validate failed (score: 1): Author: Stefan Smietanowski <stesmi@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2008 12:46:06 +0200; Hamid wrote: I think you have the terminology a little mixed up. If you mount a something without supplying -o loop "mount" will assume the filesystem resides in a DEVICE. If you mount a something WH; /archives/xfs/2008-06/msg00462.html (13,105 bytes)
12. Re: XFS: SB validate failed (score: 1): Author: Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2008 12:08:42 +1000; If the fs is not too full then xfs_copy would be good I suppose as it won't copy freespace. --Tim; /archives/xfs/2008-06/msg00469.html (10,227 bytes)
13. Re: XFS: SB validate failed (score: 1): Author: "Spam Magnet" <spam.wax@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 13:36:26 -0400; I couldn't find any XFS by using the full dump of the disk: $ od -t c jaz7.img | grep X | head 0040000 353 > 220 ( j 0 X ] I H C \0 002 001 \0 0040240 003 303 H 367 363 001 F 374 021 N 376 Z X 273 \0; /archives/xfs/2008-06/msg00486.html (11,929 bytes)
14. Re: XFS: SB validate failed (score: 1): Author: "Spam Magnet" <spam.wax@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 13:56:08 -0400; Correcting my mistake: The healthy image file does have the X F S B at 10000000 (octal) as fdisk had reported: Pt# Device Info Start End Sectors Id System 8: 2gb-ubuntu.img1 4096 3915599 3911504 a S; /archives/xfs/2008-06/msg00487.html (11,012 bytes)
15. Re: XFS: SB validate failed (score: 1): Author: Stefan Smietanowski <stesmi@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2008 20:59:43 +0200; Spam Magnet wrote: (The healthy disk image also doesn't have any XFS but it has: 'S f x' (capital s)) Correcting my mistake: The healthy image file does have the X F S B at 10000000 (octal) as fdisk; /archives/xfs/2008-06/msg00489.html (10,722 bytes)
16. Re: XFS: SB validate failed (score: 1): Author: "Spam Magnet" <spam.wax@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 15:39:07 -0400; I think they are but I used -u option of fdisk: $ fdisk -ul jaz7.img Disk jaz7.img (SGI disk label): 255 heads, 63 sectors, 0 cylinders Units = sectors of 1 * 512 bytes -- partitions -- Pt# Device In; /archives/xfs/2008-06/msg00490.html (12,514 bytes)
17. Re: XFS: SB validate failed (score: 1): Author: Stefan Smietanowski <stesmi@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2008 22:23:51 +0200; Spam Magnet wrote: On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Stefan Smietanowski <stesmi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: Spam Magnet wrote: (The healthy disk image also doesn't have any XFS but it has: 'S f x' (capital s)); /archives/xfs/2008-06/msg00492.html (12,514 bytes)
18. Re: XFS: SB validate failed (score: 1): Author: "Spam Magnet" <spam.wax@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 12:16:17 -0400; 3072*2048=6,291,456 (30000000 octal) $ od -t c jaz7.img | grep 30000000 30000000 377 377 367 371 \0 \0 0 365 \0 \0 ? y \0 \0 004 016 130000000 201 244 \0 001 \0 \0 \0 \0 \0 \0 006 201 B 373 306 307 S; /archives/xfs/2008-06/msg00522.html (12,256 bytes)
19. GOTO (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 13:05:48 -0400; allowed to create inodes at; /archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00448.html (10,648 bytes)
20. lem (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 12:19:57 -0500; ng IRIX 6.5) I get an error; /archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00449.html (9,535 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]