Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Wrong\s+UIDs\s+reported\s+in\s+\/proc\/net\/tcp\s*$/: 38 ]

Total 38 documents matching your query.

1. Wrong UIDs reported in /proc/net/tcp (score: 1)
Author: oushik" <raghavendra.koushik@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 15:53:58 -0500
In our testing we've found some occurrences of identd reporting back the wrong username for the owner of a socket. We added some instrumentation to identd so that we can tell it what we expect the u
/archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00346.html (10,080 bytes)

2. Re: Wrong UIDs reported in /proc/net/tcp (score: 1)
Author: . Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 08:06:11 +1100
/proc/net/tcp is an obsolete interface. It is inherently unreliable in that a record may be read using two read(2) calls. Those two calls may end up looking at two different records. So please use th
/archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00349.html (9,396 bytes)

3. Re: Wrong UIDs reported in /proc/net/tcp (score: 1)
Author: deaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 13:11:42 -0800 (PST)
The following may be of interest: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=44854 -- Arthur
/archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00350.html (8,694 bytes)

4. Re: Wrong UIDs reported in /proc/net/tcp (score: 1)
Author: Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 17:41:20 -0500
This isn't really the same issue. This looks like an euid vs. uid problem that reproduces every time. The problem we are seeing is a timing-window-race-condition kind of problem that happens maybe 1
/archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00352.html (9,123 bytes)

5. Re: Wrong UIDs reported in /proc/net/tcp (score: 1)
Author: kepner@xxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 17:43:37 -0500
Is it unreliable in that the wrong user id will get returned for an established socket? How could such a thing happen? Chad
/archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00353.html (9,292 bytes)

6. Re: Wrong UIDs reported in /proc/net/tcp (score: 1)
Author: had@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 09:58:12 +1100
In 2.4 it is entirely possible to have a record broken up into two reads. There is no guarantee that the two reads will be reading the same record. -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email
/archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00355.html (10,046 bytes)

7. Re: Wrong UIDs reported in /proc/net/tcp (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 18:04:11 -0500
Let me make sure I understand what you're saying here... You're saying that since pidentd is calling fgets(), that can actually result in multiple read() calls. Because of this, the first half of th
/archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00356.html (9,788 bytes)

8. Re: Wrong UIDs reported in /proc/net/tcp (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 10:18:56 +1100
fgets() is implemented on top of a buffered read, with my glibc it reads 4096 bytes. Whatever that size is, the second read is most likely going to be reading a partial record. There is no guarantee
/archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00357.html (10,448 bytes)

9. Re: Wrong UIDs reported in /proc/net/tcp (score: 1)
Author: @xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 14:02:57 -0500
d
/archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00665.html (10,727 bytes)

10. Re: Wrong UIDs reported in /proc/net/tcp (score: 1)
Author: ristoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 08:03:07 +1100
s
/archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00676.html (10,458 bytes)

11. Re: Wrong UIDs reported in /proc/net/tcp (score: 1)
Author: d Dreier <roland@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 13:27:00 -0800
x
/archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00677.html (10,842 bytes)

12. Re: Wrong UIDs reported in /proc/net/tcp (score: 1)
Author: hen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 09:07:19 +1100
.
/archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00680.html (10,887 bytes)

13. Re: Wrong UIDs reported in /proc/net/tcp (score: 1)
Author: ik <raghavendra.koushik@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 14:16:33 -0800
~
/archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00681.html (9,753 bytes)

14. Re: Wrong UIDs reported in /proc/net/tcp (score: 1)
Author: r" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 10:40:58 +1100
,
/archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00688.html (10,647 bytes)

15. Re: Wrong UIDs reported in /proc/net/tcp (score: 1)
Author: " <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 18:49:11 -0500
a
/archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00689.html (10,285 bytes)

16. Re: Wrong UIDs reported in /proc/net/tcp (score: 1)
Author: rrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 15:56:43 -0800
i
/archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00690.html (9,597 bytes)

17. Re: Wrong UIDs reported in /proc/net/tcp (score: 1)
Author: xxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 12:26:10 +1100
e
/archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00699.html (10,116 bytes)

18. Re: Wrong UIDs reported in /proc/net/tcp (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 15:27:02 +0100 (CET)
a
/archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00718.html (9,592 bytes)

19. Re: Wrong UIDs reported in /proc/net/tcp (score: 1)
Author: emminger@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 16:01:56 -0500
t
/archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00737.html (10,141 bytes)

20. Wrong UIDs reported in /proc/net/tcp (score: 1)
Author: "Chad N. Tindel" <chad@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 15:53:58 -0500
Hello In our testing we've found some occurrences of identd reporting back the wrong username for the owner of a socket. We added some instrumentation to identd so that we can tell it what we expect
/archives/netdev/2004-11/msg01400.html (10,080 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu