- 1. Why release XFS as patches against a kernel ? (score: 1)
- Author: "Pietje Puk" <lbalbalba@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 01 May 2001 18:22:05 -0000
- Dear SGI, As a linux user, I really appreciate your efforts to port your high quality filesystem XFS to linux as open source. However, I cannot understand your release scheme. You must understand tha
- /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg00006.html (7,967 bytes)
- 2. RE: Why release XFS as patches against a kernel ? (score: 1)
- Author: "Christian, Chip" <chip.christian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 1 May 2001 16:47:41 -0400
- I don't understand the question. They ship kernel patches and they ship pre-patched RedHat kernel-source rpms. What more do you want? Dear SGI, As a linux user, I really appreciate your efforts to po
- /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg00009.html (8,360 bytes)
- 3. Re: Why release XFS as patches against a kernel ? (score: 1)
- Author: K Mitchell Russell <kmrussel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 1 May 2001 16:52:15 -0400 (EDT)
- Aren't these the patches here? : ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/download/Release-1.0/patches/ RPMs are available, as well as the bleeding edge source tree via CVS too. Enjoy, Mitchell
- /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg00011.html (8,127 bytes)
- 4. Re: Why release XFS as patches against a kernel ? (score: 1)
- Author: Michael Stone <mstone@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 1 May 2001 16:57:24 -0400
- A reference to that on http://linux-xfs.sgi.com/projects/xfs/? No reference to any patches there; it's often been non-intuitive to find these, unless you already know that they're there. The "point &
- /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg00013.html (9,376 bytes)
- 5. Re: Why release XFS as patches against a kernel ? (score: 1)
- Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 01 May 2001 16:12:28 -0500
- True enough.. there is an "FTP sites" link on the left, but we'll add one to the front page as well. There are also detailed links and instructions via http://linux-xfs.sgi.com/projects/xfs/1.0_relea
- /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg00017.html (8,231 bytes)
- 6. Why release XFS as patches against a kernel ? (score: 1)
- Author: xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 01 May 2001 18:22:05 -0000
- Dear SGI, As a linux user, I really appreciate your efforts to port your high quality filesystem XFS to linux as open source. However, I cannot understand your release scheme. You must understand tha
- /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg01370.html (7,967 bytes)
- 7. RE: Why release XFS as patches against a kernel ? (score: 1)
- Author: een@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 1 May 2001 16:47:41 -0400
- I don't understand the question. They ship kernel patches and they ship pre-patched RedHat kernel-source rpms. What more do you want? Dear SGI, As a linux user, I really appreciate your efforts to po
- /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg01373.html (8,360 bytes)
- 8. Re: Why release XFS as patches against a kernel ? (score: 1)
- Author: een@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 1 May 2001 16:52:15 -0400 (EDT)
- Aren't these the patches here? : ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/download/Release-1.0/patches/ RPMs are available, as well as the bleeding edge source tree via CVS too. Enjoy, Mitchell
- /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg01375.html (8,127 bytes)
- 9. Re: Why release XFS as patches against a kernel ? (score: 1)
- Author: een@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 1 May 2001 16:57:24 -0400
- A reference to that on http://linux-xfs.sgi.com/projects/xfs/? No reference to any patches there; it's often been non-intuitive to find these, unless you already know that they're there. The "point &
- /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg01377.html (9,376 bytes)
- 10. Re: Why release XFS as patches against a kernel ? (score: 1)
- Author: xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 01 May 2001 16:12:28 -0500
- True enough.. there is an "FTP sites" link on the left, but we'll add one to the front page as well. There are also detailed links and instructions via http://linux-xfs.sgi.com/projects/xfs/1.0_relea
- /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg01381.html (8,231 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu