Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Which\s+gcc\?\s+\-\-\s+2\.91\.66\,\s+2\.95\.x\,\s+2\.96\,\s+3\.0x\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Which\s+gcc\?\s+\-\-\s+2\.91\.66\,\s+2\.95\.x\,\s+2\.96\,\s+3\.0x\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. fails (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 13:00:02 -0500; http://www.atnf.csiro.au/~rgooch/linux/docs/kernel-newsflash.html/ I know RedHat is compiling its kernels with 2.96, although it did use the "kgcc" wrapper to 2.91.66 in RedHat 7.0. Most other distro; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00819.html (9,251 bytes)
2. arge h/w RAID fails (score: 1): Author: s <tvickers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 13:00:02 -0500; http://www.atnf.csiro.au/~rgooch/linux/docs/kernel-newsflash.html/ I know RedHat is compiling its kernels with 2.96, although it did use the "kgcc" wrapper to 2.91.66 in RedHat 7.0. Most other distro; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01748.html (9,251 bytes)
3. Re: Which gcc? -- 2.91.66, 2.95.x, 2.96, 3.0x (score: 1): Author: "Bryan J. Smith" <b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 13:00:02 -0500; http://www.atnf.csiro.au/~rgooch/linux/docs/kernel-newsflash.html/ I know RedHat is compiling its kernels with 2.96, although it did use the "kgcc" wrapper to 2.91.66 in RedHat 7.0. Most other distro; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg02677.html (9,346 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]