Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*We\s+have\s+a\s+mail\s+loop\!\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. We have a mail loop! (score: 1)
Author: Federico Sevilla III <jijo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2001 14:44:51 +0800 (PHT)
I thought it was just me but I don't think it is. A member of the mailing list, <cymax@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, has a mail loop on us it seems. See this trail in the received headers: Return-Path: <owner-l
/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00144.html (10,655 bytes)

2. Re: We have a mail loop! (score: 1)
Author: Walt H <waltabbyh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2001 07:07:54 -0700
Not just you :) Everything's coming back 'round again it seems. Just got up and found my mailbox full of stuff, started reading them and though "Man, these sure sound familiar...." It's like deja-vu
/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00149.html (11,813 bytes)

3. Re: We have a mail loop! (score: 1)
Author: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 06 Oct 2001 15:35:18 -0500
Hard to tell exactly what is going on. I tossed the duplicate message filter into the list procmailrc file that should catch any loop problems.
/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00160.html (11,945 bytes)

4. Re: We have a mail loop! (score: 1)
Author: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 06 Oct 2001 15:32:33 -0500
Hard to tell exactly what is going on. I tossed the duplicate message filter into the list procmailrc file that should catch any loop problems.
/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00168.html (11,271 bytes)

5. Re: We have a mail loop! (score: 1)
Author: Federico Sevilla III <jijo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2001 08:39:50 +0800 (PHT)
Like I said, it looks like the system of a certain <cymax@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> is to blame. For emphasis, a much more condensed snippet of Received headers from a randomly selected message in the list w
/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00179.html (9,477 bytes)

6. Re: We have a mail loop! (score: 1)
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2001 20:09:11 -0500
It's been done, as of this morning (US)... I still need to send the "decent message." :) -Eric -- Eric Sandeen XFS for Linux http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs sandeen@xxxxxxx SGI, Inc.
/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00180.html (7,913 bytes)

7. Re: We have a mail loop! (score: 1)
Author: Federico Sevilla III <jijo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2001 09:31:12 +0800 (PHT)
Alright! Thanks Eric. (So now we know who to send our grievances to, hehehe). :) Hahaha. Well, technically, I don't think you -need- to send that. The kickout wasn't unprovoked anyway. :( ... glad th
/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00182.html (7,849 bytes)

8. We have a mail loop! (score: 1)
Author: Federico Sevilla III <jijo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2001 14:44:51 +0800 (PHT)
e
/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg01224.html (10,655 bytes)

9. Re: We have a mail loop! (score: 1)
Author: Walt H <waltabbyh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2001 07:07:54 -0700
l
/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg01229.html (11,813 bytes)

10. Re: We have a mail loop! (score: 1)
Author: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 06 Oct 2001 15:35:18 -0500
o
/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg01240.html (11,945 bytes)

11. Re: We have a mail loop! (score: 1)
Author: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 06 Oct 2001 15:32:33 -0500
c
/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg01248.html (11,271 bytes)

12. Re: We have a mail loop! (score: 1)
Author: Federico Sevilla III <jijo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2001 08:39:50 +0800 (PHT)
6
/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg01259.html (9,477 bytes)

13. Re: We have a mail loop! (score: 1)
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2001 20:09:11 -0500
w
/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg01260.html (7,913 bytes)

14. Re: We have a mail loop! (score: 1)
Author: Federico Sevilla III <jijo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2001 09:31:12 +0800 (PHT)
w
/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg01262.html (7,849 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu