Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Uhhuh\.\.\s+2\.4\.12\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Uhhuh.. 2.4.12 (score: 1)
Author: Federico Sevilla III <jijo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 17:14:45 +0800 (PHT)
I know Alan's in RedHat's payroll (and RedHat is rather ext3-centric, it seems, but this is just my opinion), but perhaps if we could get XFS on his good side he'd manage to keep his tree XFS-enabled
/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00330.html (8,825 bytes)

2. Re: Uhhuh.. 2.4.12 (score: 1)
Author: Joseph Fannin <jhf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 05:48:52 -0400
Alan is on RedHat's payroll but he seems to put some considerable effort into being impartial, at least on kernel issues. He's not even in charge of packaging up RedHat's release kernels, and at leas
/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00331.html (9,993 bytes)

3. Re: Uhhuh.. 2.4.12 (score: 1)
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 09:34:31 -0500
That may be the current opinion, but the fact is that there are compiler bugs in those versions of gcc that miscompile some of our perfectly legitimate code. See my TAKE message from yesterday, for e
/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00336.html (7,946 bytes)

4. Re: Uhhuh.. 2.4.12 (score: 1)
Author: "D. Stimits" <stimits@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 09:56:44 -0600
I'm curious how much the boot kernel size and required ramdisk would be reduced with a single set of functions? ... D. Stimits, stimits@xxxxxxxxxx
/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00339.html (7,941 bytes)

5. Re: Uhhuh.. 2.4.12 (score: 1)
Author: Joseph Fannin <jhf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 15:20:13 -0400
After sending off my last mail I found myself wishing I'd written that I've been running an -xfs kernel (with XFS on /) for over a month now that was built with the 2.95.4-prerelease in Debian unstab
/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00347.html (9,121 bytes)

6. Re: Uhhuh.. 2.4.12 (score: 1)
Author: Federico Sevilla III <jijo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 17:14:45 +0800 (PHT)
e
/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg01410.html (8,825 bytes)

7. Re: Uhhuh.. 2.4.12 (score: 1)
Author: Joseph Fannin <jhf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 05:48:52 -0400
d
/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg01411.html (9,993 bytes)

8. Re: Uhhuh.. 2.4.12 (score: 1)
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 09:34:31 -0500
c
/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg01416.html (7,946 bytes)

9. Re: Uhhuh.. 2.4.12 (score: 1)
Author: "D. Stimits" <stimits@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 09:56:44 -0600
.
/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg01419.html (7,941 bytes)

10. Re: Uhhuh.. 2.4.12 (score: 1)
Author: Joseph Fannin <jhf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 15:20:13 -0400
.
/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg01427.html (9,121 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu