Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Tomorrow\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Tomorrow\s*$/: 90 ]

Total 90 documents matching your query.

1. Tomorrow (score: 1): Author: xxxxx>; Date: 23 May 2003 07:46:42 -0500; Are those of you working on XFS directly for SGI going to be around next week working for SGI? I know this is a rough time for you, whether you're in the 10% or the 90%. I wish the best for you all,; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00225.html (7,501 bytes)
2. Re: Tomorrow (score: 1): Author: xxxxx>; Date: 23 May 2003 08:39:22 -0500; We are still here, still plugging away. We may not be as visible on the mailing list as we used to be, lots of other stuff going on like CXFS and Altix work. In the next few months (deliberately vagu; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00226.html (8,694 bytes)
3. Re: Tomorrow (score: 1): Author: xxxxx>; Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 15:44:38 +0200; Congratulations. Won't that be a change in the on disk format? -Andi; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00227.html (8,181 bytes)
4. Re: Tomorrow (score: 1): Author: xxxxx>; Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 15:05:31 +0100; The current plan is to have a v3 directory format for case sensitive filesystems.; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00230.html (8,587 bytes)
5. Re: Tomorrow (score: 1): Author: xxxxx>; Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 17:23:21 +0100; I know you have to be vague, but is it at all possible to give a better guestimate for XFS 1.3 (or even a v1.2.1 that's been mentioned here before)? Thanks James Pearson; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00239.html (8,343 bytes)
6. Re: Tomorrow (score: 1): Author: xxxxx>; Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 11:31:40 -0500; I was just refering to the announcement about cutbacks. I was just expressing my sincere hope that no one on the XFS was personally affected. Not because of what it would do to the great file system,; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00240.html (10,198 bytes)
7. Re: Tomorrow (score: 1): Author: xxxxx>; Date: 23 May 2003 11:33:52 -0500; How about "when it's ready?" ;-) We have a week off next week, so not much activity for a little while. But I would expect the first 1.3 prereleases to show up not too long after that, unless plans c; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00247.html (9,193 bytes)
8. Re: Tomorrow (score: 1): Author: xxxxx>; Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 23:17:10 -0800; eh? XFS is already case sensitive. or do you mean a (i hope optional and non-default) v3 which is brokenly case INsensitive? seems like a sad thing to put such cruft into a decent filesystem just to; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00248.html (9,611 bytes)
9. Re: Tomorrow (score: 1): Author: xxxxx>; Date: Sat, 24 May 2003 09:52:45 +0100; Umm, caseInsensitive, of course :) Sorry for the stupid typo. yes. I will make sure it'll be a config option.; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00250.html (9,165 bytes)
10. Re: Tomorrow (score: 1): Author: xxxxx>; Date: Sat, 24 May 2003 01:15:16 -0800; i wouldn't call them v3 dirs either, that implies its an `upgrade' to v2, when in fact its a downgrade (non-broken -> broken). maybe call them v0 (afaik xfs only has two dir formats v1 and v2). or ca; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00251.html (10,575 bytes)
11. Re: Tomorrow (score: 1): Author: xxxxx>; Date: Sat, 24 May 2003 11:31:03 +0200; I would not call them broken, but what is a bit worrying is that it can be quite complicated to lower case letters. In the American ASCII subset it's easy, but for other languages it usually needs h; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00252.html (9,619 bytes)
12. Re: Tomorrow (score: 1): Author: xxxxx>; Date: Sat, 24 May 2003 02:04:41 -0800; all the more reason to leave it in userspace. all for a legacy OS... -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/ Attachment: pgp5K2xoPcX9e.pgp Description: PGP signature; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00253.html (10,994 bytes)
13. Re: Tomorrow (score: 1): Author: xxxxx>; Date: 25 May 2003 08:11:23 +1000; Supporting that 'legacy' OS is a major part of my job ( and for many others I expect). If it wasn't for Samba I would have had to become a 'MicroSerf' years ago and switched to only doing Micro$oft s; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00255.html (10,296 bytes)
14. Re: Tomorrow (score: 1): Author: xxxxx>; Date: Sat, 24 May 2003 14:35:08 -0800; never said to. said to keep that support in userspace where it currently is, and currently belongs. -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/ Attachment: pgp4OkYQDLlDA.pgp Description: PGP sig; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00257.html (11,190 bytes)
15. Re: Tomorrow (score: 1): Author: xxxxx>; Date: 26 May 2003 21:45:03 -0500; Unfortunately some folks get upset about performance of having to do a readdir each time you look up a name. Since this is really the only way user space can do it. Steve; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00261.html (10,246 bytes)
16. Re: Tomorrow (score: 1): Author: xxxxx>; Date: Mon, 26 May 2003 18:55:45 -0800; well price you pay for using crud like windows.. anyway they should just use a broken case insensitive filesystem like NTFS, or HFS+ for the smb export, rather then insist we cripple (or cruftify) de; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00262.html (11,084 bytes)
17. Re: Tomorrow (score: 1): Author: xxxxx>; Date: 26 May 2003 22:02:12 -0500; This stuff will not get in the way of normal operation, and there is a market for being an SMB server - and XFS runs on more than one operating system. Actually it is really not that much code. Steve; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00263.html (10,398 bytes)
18. Re: Tomorrow (score: 1): Author: xxxxx>; Date: Mon, 26 May 2003 19:13:58 -0800; so long as it can be turned off at compile time, and the broken behavior is never default im happy. still would rather see you guys working on more important things. -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00264.html (11,260 bytes)
19. Re: Tomorrow (score: 1): Author: xxxxx>; Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 13:23:04 +1000; => so long as it can be turned off at compile time, and the broken => behavior is never default im happy. still would rather see you guys => working on more important things.=20 It's obviously more i; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00265.html (9,105 bytes)
20. RE: Tomorrow (score: 1): Author: xxxxx>; Date: Mon, 26 May 2003 22:33:06 -0600; I'm just curious, is the case insensitivity work being done starting with what I sent a while back? If so, I've fixed some things in that code, that you'd want to have before you get too far along. -; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00266.html (9,574 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]