Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TCP\:\s+sendmsg\/recvmsg\/ioctl$SIOCINQ\/SIOCOUTQ$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TCP\:\s+sendmsg\/recvmsg\/ioctl$SIOCINQ\/SIOCOUTQ$\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. TCP: sendmsg/recvmsg/ioctl(SIOCINQ/SIOCOUTQ) (score: 1): Author: ler" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 16:42:31 -0600; _; /archives/netdev/2001-01/msg00179.html (8,190 bytes)
2. Re: TCP: sendmsg/recvmsg/ioctl(SIOCINQ/SIOCOUTQ) (score: 1): Author: " <jleu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 15:10:01 -0800 (PST); d; /archives/netdev/2001-01/msg00180.html (8,624 bytes)
3. Re: TCP: sendmsg/recvmsg/ioctl(SIOCINQ/SIOCOUTQ) (score: 1): Author: ler" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 17:47:26 -0600; i; /archives/netdev/2001-01/msg00181.html (9,609 bytes)
4. Re: TCP: sendmsg/recvmsg/ioctl(SIOCINQ/SIOCOUTQ) (score: 1): Author: " <jleu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 22:19:50 -0500 (EST); c; /archives/netdev/2001-01/msg00182.html (8,188 bytes)
5. Re: TCP: sendmsg/recvmsg/ioctl(SIOCINQ/SIOCOUTQ) (score: 1): Author:; Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 15:12:48 +0100; .; /archives/netdev/2001-01/msg00184.html (9,227 bytes)
6. TCP: sendmsg/recvmsg/ioctl(SIOCINQ/SIOCOUTQ) (score: 1): Author: "James R. Leu" <jleu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 16:42:31 -0600; It seems that TCPs recvmsg/sendmsg and ioctl for SIOCINQ/SIOCOUTQ do not check to make sure the socket is connected. I was unable to find a place that does check to make sure the socket is connected; /archives/netdev/2001-01/msg00568.html (8,382 bytes)
7. Re: TCP: sendmsg/recvmsg/ioctl(SIOCINQ/SIOCOUTQ) (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 15:10:01 -0800 (PST); And what is the problem with that? If the socket is in the process of connecting (SYN_SENT or SYN_RECV) then SIOCINQ/SIOCOUTQ will report zero. If closed or closing, it will report zero since by defi; /archives/netdev/2001-01/msg00569.html (8,756 bytes)
8. Re: TCP: sendmsg/recvmsg/ioctl(SIOCINQ/SIOCOUTQ) (score: 1): Author: "James R. Leu" <jleu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 17:47:26 -0600; Hello David, This makes sense. I interpreted the The man page for tcp(4) to say that FIONREAD and TIOCOUTQ would leave errno equal to EPIPE if the socket was closed. In the code I see how sendmsg/rec; /archives/netdev/2001-01/msg00570.html (9,819 bytes)
9. Re: TCP: sendmsg/recvmsg/ioctl(SIOCINQ/SIOCOUTQ) (score: 1): Author: John Heffner <jheffner@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 22:19:50 -0500 (EST); If the other end has closed, you will get a -EPIPE from wait_for_tcp_connect(). -John; /archives/netdev/2001-01/msg00571.html (8,217 bytes)
10. Re: TCP: sendmsg/recvmsg/ioctl(SIOCINQ/SIOCOUTQ) (score: 1): Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 15:12:48 +0100; .B FIONREAD, TIOCINQ Returns the amount of queued unread data in the receive buffer. Argument is a pointer to an integer. I honestly don't see how it can be interpreted to state that. -Andi -- This i; /archives/netdev/2001-01/msg00573.html (9,461 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]