Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TAKE\s+981498\s+\-\s+Use\s+xfs_idestroy\s+to\s+cleanup\s+an\s+inode\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TAKE\s+981498\s+\-\s+Use\s+xfs_idestroy\s+to\s+cleanup\s+an\s+inode\.\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. TAKE 981498 - Use xfs_idestroy() to cleanup an inode. (score: 1): Author: lachlan@xxxxxxx (Lachlan McIlroy); Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 13:33:02 +1000 (EST); Use xfs_idestroy() to cleanup an inode. The following file(s) were checked into: longdrop.melbourne.sgi.com:/isms/linux/2.6.x-xfs-melb Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:31927a fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c - 1.520; /archives/xfs/2008-08/msg00309.html (7,710 bytes)
2. Re: TAKE 981498 - Use xfs_idestroy() to cleanup an inode. (score: 1): Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 13:56:42 +1000; I'm not sure what has been checked in this patch, even though it's recorded that I reviewed it. Yes, I reviewed the original patch, but I asked for changes to be made. I *haven't reviewed* what got c; /archives/xfs/2008-08/msg00310.html (8,924 bytes)
3. Re: TAKE 981498 - Use xfs_idestroy() to cleanup an inode. (score: 1): Author: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 16:13:22 +1000; This change was part of another patch that you reviewed. This small change got left out when I merged my changes in with your inode allocation cleanup which you asked me to do. I also had to modify y; /archives/xfs/2008-08/msg00312.html (9,701 bytes)
4. Re: TAKE 981498 - Use xfs_idestroy() to cleanup an inode. (score: 1): Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 21:15:03 +1000; Yes, I did ask for you to do that and I kinda expected to see the result for review again after that. I did not review the changes that were committed. A second review would have caught the bug you i; /archives/xfs/2008-08/msg00315.html (9,603 bytes)
5. TAKE 981498 - Use xfs_idestroy() to cleanup an inode. (score: 1): Author: oy); Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 13:33:02 +1000 (EST); Use xfs_idestroy() to cleanup an inode. The following file(s) were checked into: longdrop.melbourne.sgi.com:/isms/linux/2.6.x-xfs-melb Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:31927a fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c - 1.520; /archives/xfs/2008-08/msg00757.html (7,710 bytes)
6. Re: TAKE 981498 - Use xfs_idestroy() to cleanup an inode. (score: 1): Author: oy); Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 13:56:42 +1000; I'm not sure what has been checked in this patch, even though it's recorded that I reviewed it. Yes, I reviewed the original patch, but I asked for changes to be made. I *haven't reviewed* what got c; /archives/xfs/2008-08/msg00758.html (8,924 bytes)
7. Re: TAKE 981498 - Use xfs_idestroy() to cleanup an inode. (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 16:13:22 +1000; This change was part of another patch that you reviewed. This small change got left out when I merged my changes in with your inode allocation cleanup which you asked me to do. I also had to modify y; /archives/xfs/2008-08/msg00760.html (9,701 bytes)
8. Re: TAKE 981498 - Use xfs_idestroy() to cleanup an inode. (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 21:15:03 +1000; Yes, I did ask for you to do that and I kinda expected to see the result for review again after that. I did not review the changes that were committed. A second review would have caught the bug you i; /archives/xfs/2008-08/msg00763.html (9,603 bytes)
9. TAKE 981498 - Use xfs_idestroy() to cleanup an inode. (score: 1): Author: lachlan@xxxxxxx (Lachlan McIlroy); Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 13:33:02 +1000 (EST); Use xfs_idestroy() to cleanup an inode. The following file(s) were checked into: longdrop.melbourne.sgi.com:/isms/linux/2.6.x-xfs-melb Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:31927a fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c - 1.520; /archives/xfs/2008-08/msg01205.html (7,725 bytes)
10. Re: TAKE 981498 - Use xfs_idestroy() to cleanup an inode. (score: 1): Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 13:56:42 +1000; I'm not sure what has been checked in this patch, even though it's recorded that I reviewed it. Yes, I reviewed the original patch, but I asked for changes to be made. I *haven't reviewed* what got c; /archives/xfs/2008-08/msg01206.html (8,994 bytes)
11. Re: TAKE 981498 - Use xfs_idestroy() to cleanup an inode. (score: 1): Author: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 16:13:22 +1000; This change was part of another patch that you reviewed. This small change got left out when I merged my changes in with your inode allocation cleanup which you asked me to do. I also had to modify y; /archives/xfs/2008-08/msg01208.html (9,759 bytes)
12. Re: TAKE 981498 - Use xfs_idestroy() to cleanup an inode. (score: 1): Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 21:15:03 +1000; Yes, I did ask for you to do that and I kinda expected to see the result for review again after that. I did not review the changes that were committed. A second review would have caught the bug you i; /archives/xfs/2008-08/msg01211.html (9,743 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]