Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TAKE\s+936255\s+\-\s+Remove\s+dead\s+code\.\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. TAKE 936255 - Remove dead code. (score: 1)
Author: xxxx>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 04:18:18 -0500
Patch from Adrian Bunk The following file(s) were checked into: bonnie.engr.sgi.com:/isms/linux/2.6.x-xfs Modid: xfs-linux:xfs-kern:192759a fs/xfs/xfs_trans_inode.c - 1.49 - changed http://oss.sgi.co
/archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00109.html (10,010 bytes)

2. Re: TAKE 936255 - Remove dead code. (score: 1)
Author: xxxx>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 01:09:54 -0700
Recent cleanups making some functions static now generate warnings. Trivial fixes: Index: taniwha-kernel-050519/fs/xfs/xfs_btree.c == -- taniwha-kernel-050519.orig/fs/xfs/xfs_btree.c 2005-05-20 00:59
/archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00146.html (8,934 bytes)

3. Re: TAKE 936255 - Remove dead code. (score: 1)
Author: xxxx>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 15:17:01 +0100
Hmm, I didn't see this warnings. What compiler do you use? The Patches looks fine, though.
/archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00150.html (7,973 bytes)

4. Re: TAKE 936255 - Remove dead code. (score: 1)
Author: xxxx>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 09:05:16 -0700
gcc (GCC) 3.3.6 (Debian 1:3.3.6-5) Maybe you had CONFIG_XFS_DEBUG on which turns STATIC off or similar?
/archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00152.html (8,001 bytes)

5. TAKE 936255 - Remove dead code. (score: 1)
Author: ch@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 04:18:18 -0500
Patch from Adrian Bunk The following file(s) were checked into: bonnie.engr.sgi.com:/isms/linux/2.6.x-xfs Modid: xfs-linux:xfs-kern:192759a fs/xfs/xfs_trans_inode.c - 1.49 - changed http://oss.sgi.co
/archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00310.html (10,010 bytes)

6. Re: TAKE 936255 - Remove dead code. (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 01:09:54 -0700
Recent cleanups making some functions static now generate warnings. Trivial fixes: Index: taniwha-kernel-050519/fs/xfs/xfs_btree.c == -- taniwha-kernel-050519.orig/fs/xfs/xfs_btree.c 2005-05-20 00:59
/archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00347.html (8,934 bytes)

7. Re: TAKE 936255 - Remove dead code. (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 15:17:01 +0100
Hmm, I didn't see this warnings. What compiler do you use? The Patches looks fine, though.
/archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00351.html (7,973 bytes)

8. Re: TAKE 936255 - Remove dead code. (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 09:05:16 -0700
gcc (GCC) 3.3.6 (Debian 1:3.3.6-5) Maybe you had CONFIG_XFS_DEBUG on which turns STATIC off or similar?
/archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00353.html (8,001 bytes)

9. TAKE 936255 - Remove dead code. (score: 1)
Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 04:18:18 -0500
Patch from Adrian Bunk The following file(s) were checked into: bonnie.engr.sgi.com:/isms/linux/2.6.x-xfs Modid: xfs-linux:xfs-kern:192759a fs/xfs/xfs_trans_inode.c - 1.49 - changed http://oss.sgi.co
/archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00511.html (10,160 bytes)

10. Re: TAKE 936255 - Remove dead code. (score: 1)
Author: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 01:09:54 -0700
Recent cleanups making some functions static now generate warnings. Trivial fixes: Index: taniwha-kernel-050519/fs/xfs/xfs_btree.c == -- taniwha-kernel-050519.orig/fs/xfs/xfs_btree.c 2005-05-20 00:59
/archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00548.html (8,984 bytes)

11. Re: TAKE 936255 - Remove dead code. (score: 1)
Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 15:17:01 +0100
Hmm, I didn't see this warnings. What compiler do you use? The Patches looks fine, though.
/archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00552.html (8,086 bytes)

12. Re: TAKE 936255 - Remove dead code. (score: 1)
Author: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 09:05:16 -0700
gcc (GCC) 3.3.6 (Debian 1:3.3.6-5) Maybe you had CONFIG_XFS_DEBUG on which turns STATIC off or similar?
/archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00554.html (8,128 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu