Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TAKE\s+\-\s+reduce\s+synchronous\s+transaction\s+use\s+in\s+xfs\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TAKE\s+\-\s+reduce\s+synchronous\s+transaction\s+use\s+in\s+xfs\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Re: TAKE - reduce synchronous transaction use in xfs (score: 1): Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2002 20:46:56 +0100; [just noticing some big slow rm -rfs on a xfs disk] Could you expand a bit on that issue? I would like to understand it. Thanks, -Andi; /archives/xfs/2002-03/msg00043.html (7,842 bytes)
2. Re: TAKE - reduce synchronous transaction use in xfs (score: 1): Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: 04 Mar 2002 14:11:05 -0600; Well, the synchronous transaction removal means we get to fill the internal log buffers before we write them. So we manage to do larger writes to the log, but we still max out at 32K per write. We us; /archives/xfs/2002-03/msg00044.html (9,664 bytes)
3. Re: TAKE - reduce synchronous transaction use in xfs (score: 1): Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2002 21:19:34 +0100; Thanks for the explanation. It feels better now that I know why it is slow :-) Hmm, I may consider pulling that into my kernel then if it is a low risk change. -Andi; /archives/xfs/2002-03/msg00045.html (8,344 bytes)
4. Re: TAKE - reduce synchronous transaction use in xfs (score: 1): Author: xxxx>; Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2002 20:46:56 +0100; [just noticing some big slow rm -rfs on a xfs disk] Could you expand a bit on that issue? I would like to understand it. Thanks, -Andi; /archives/xfs/2002-03/msg00748.html (7,842 bytes)
5. Re: TAKE - reduce synchronous transaction use in xfs (score: 1): Author: xxxx>; Date: 04 Mar 2002 14:11:05 -0600; Well, the synchronous transaction removal means we get to fill the internal log buffers before we write them. So we manage to do larger writes to the log, but we still max out at 32K per write. We us; /archives/xfs/2002-03/msg00749.html (9,664 bytes)
6. Re: TAKE - reduce synchronous transaction use in xfs (score: 1): Author: xxxx>; Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2002 21:19:34 +0100; Thanks for the explanation. It feels better now that I know why it is slow :-) Hmm, I may consider pulling that into my kernel then if it is a low risk change. -Andi; /archives/xfs/2002-03/msg00750.html (8,344 bytes)
7. re) (score: 1): Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 14:55:04 -0600; This removes the synchronous transactions from the delete path in XFS. This work was mostly done by Glen Overby, I am just putting the code into the Linux tree here. I have been running this code on; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00305.html (8,879 bytes)
8. ailure) (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 14:55:04 -0600; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00879.html (8,879 bytes)
9. TAKE - reduce synchronous transaction use in xfs (score: 1): Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 14:55:04 -0600; This removes the synchronous transactions from the delete path in XFS. This work was mostly done by Glen Overby, I am just putting the code into the Linux tree here. I have been running this code on; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg01453.html (8,879 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]