Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TAKE\s+\-\s+mount\s+msgs\s*$/: 36 ]

Total 36 documents matching your query.

1. TAKE - mount msgs (score: 1)
Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 21:39:42 +1000 (EST)
Consensus seems to be less chatty on mount - this should do the trick. Can still get at these messages with a debug build (as is the case for the nightly QA runs) where these messages are still quite
/archives/xfs/2001-09/msg00063.html (7,873 bytes)

2. Re: TAKE - mount msgs (score: 1)
Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 13:44:37 +0200
I think it would be better to keep them; as it makes debugging even on production machines easier. -Andi
/archives/xfs/2001-09/msg00064.html (8,416 bytes)

3. Re: TAKE - mount msgs (score: 1)
Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 22:53:23 +1100
hi Andi, _Now_ you pipe up! Well, I don't think the "finished clean mount" message is particularly useful, but I'll put the initial message back in at the start of a mount, I think, so that in the no
/archives/xfs/2001-09/msg00066.html (9,161 bytes)

4. Re: TAKE - mount msgs (score: 1)
Author: Ethan Benson <erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 04:32:17 -0800
please don't, or make it a compile time option. it makes an ugly mess of boot messages and clutters the logs with really useless data. make it a compile time option if some people want it. CONFIG_VER
/archives/xfs/2001-09/msg00068.html (10,384 bytes)

5. Re: TAKE - mount msgs (score: 1)
Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 14:43:23 +0200
Keeping the initial message only would be fine for me. -Andi
/archives/xfs/2001-09/msg00070.html (10,014 bytes)

6. Re: TAKE - mount msgs (score: 1)
Author: Ethan Benson <erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 05:21:13 -0800
why? at least on debian mount is called with -v which prints its own (more informative) mounting message -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/ Attachment: pgpOK6Xj2ZZl8.pgp Description: PG
/archives/xfs/2001-09/msg00073.html (9,893 bytes)

7. Re: TAKE - mount msgs (score: 1)
Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2001 15:23:12 +0200
please don't, or make it a compile time option. it makes an ugly mess of boot messages and clutters the logs with really useless data. make it a compile time option if some people want it. =20 CONFIG
/archives/xfs/2001-09/msg00074.html (10,745 bytes)

8. Re: TAKE - mount msgs (score: 1)
Author: Ethan Benson <erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 05:31:17 -0800
running mount will also tell you that it worked. as for recovery, i have always said leave the message mentioning that recovery was needed, i want to know that. but if no recovery was needed, and not
/archives/xfs/2001-09/msg00075.html (10,961 bytes)

9. Re: TAKE - mount msgs (score: 1)
Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 15:55:55 +0200
Doesn't help for the root fs. -Andi
/archives/xfs/2001-09/msg00077.html (9,672 bytes)

10. Re: TAKE - mount msgs (score: 1)
Author: Ethan Benson <erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 06:01:29 -0800
um... if the root filesystem doesn't mount i think your going to notice ;-) -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/ Attachment: pgpGEsHdUHONG.pgp Description: PGP signature
/archives/xfs/2001-09/msg00078.html (10,536 bytes)

11. Re: TAKE - mount msgs (score: 1)
Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 16:23:02 +0200
The point is that you can quickly blame XFS for it ("it crashed in XFS log replay"). With no message it is a lot harder to find which subsystem to debug. -Andi
/archives/xfs/2001-09/msg00079.html (10,429 bytes)

12. Re: TAKE - mount msgs (score: 1)
Author: Ethan Benson <erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 06:39:22 -0800
so print the messages in debug mode, but not otherwise. -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/ Attachment: pgpYSN7DzEd7E.pgp Description: PGP signature
/archives/xfs/2001-09/msg00081.html (10,425 bytes)

13. Re: TAKE - mount msgs (score: 1)
Author: Blizbor <tb670725@xxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2001 17:43:57 +0200
Ethan, so what next ? pppd authors ? ethernet drivers authors ? maybe guys doing scsi ? What should be changed next to produce less initial output ? Please, don't be silly. When you are managing netw
/archives/xfs/2001-09/msg00085.html (10,293 bytes)

14. Re: TAKE - mount msgs (score: 1)
Author: Simon Matter <simon.matter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2001 17:43:42 +0200
from mobile.sauter-bc.com (unknown [10.1.6.21]) by basel1.sauter-bc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82B6057306; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 17:43:42 +0200 (CEST) Cc: Ethan Benson <erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xx
/archives/xfs/2001-09/msg00087.html (10,802 bytes)

15. Re: TAKE - mount msgs (score: 1)
Author: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 04 Sep 2001 12:46:33 -0500
Yes... I agree, having a the mount message is very helpful especially when loading xfs as a module... I vote for leaving the message in ... maybe shrink it to one line if people really thinks it's "c
/archives/xfs/2001-09/msg00096.html (10,613 bytes)

16. Re: TAKE - mount msgs (score: 1)
Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 09:23:21 +1100
hi Russell, Yup, thanks - thats what I ended up doing - leaving in just one line for the normal (clean log) case, more if anything unusual is happening, and more for debug kernels. And now back to do
/archives/xfs/2001-09/msg00100.html (10,397 bytes)

17. Re: TAKE - mount msgs (score: 1)
Author: Florin Andrei <florin@xxxxxxx>
Date: 04 Sep 2001 15:22:32 -0700
One line per partition seems to be the best tradeoff: "filesystem /dev/blahblah failed" or "filesystem /dev/foobar succeeded" or something. And maybe just one more line when the module is loaded up (
/archives/xfs/2001-09/msg00101.html (9,353 bytes)

18. RE: TAKE - mount msgs (score: 1)
Author: Joshua Penix <jpenix@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 15:49:22 -0700
Linus himself seems to want to eliminate "good status" messages from kernel http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=99374815219617&w=2 --Josh
/archives/xfs/2001-09/msg00103.html (8,577 bytes)

19. TAKE - mount msgs (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 21:39:42 +1000 (EST)
Consensus seems to be less chatty on mount - this should do the trick. Can still get at these messages with a debug build (as is the case for the nightly QA runs) where these messages are still quite
/archives/xfs/2001-09/msg00741.html (7,873 bytes)

20. Re: TAKE - mount msgs (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 13:44:37 +0200
I think it would be better to keep them; as it makes debugging even on production machines easier. -Andi
/archives/xfs/2001-09/msg00742.html (8,416 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu