Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TAKE\s+\-\s+add\s+kgcc\s+line\s+for\s+RH\s+7\.0\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. TAKE - add kgcc line for RH 7.0 (score: 1)
Author: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 16:43:25 -0500
The following file(s) were checked into: bonnie.engr.sgi.com:/isms/slinx/2.4.x-xfs Also changed extraversion to XFS-test8 Modid: 2.4.x-xfs:slinx:75481a linux/Makefile - 1.68 - Add compile line "kgcc"
/archives/xfs/2000-10/msg00022.html (6,960 bytes)

2. Re: TAKE - add kgcc line for RH 7.0 (score: 1)
Author: "Andi Kleen" <ak@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 14:11:40 +0200
Hallo Russell, Could you please put somewhere into the XFS Beta module something like This should save the users of distributions which come with 2.95 by default (SuSE, newer Debian, probably others)
/archives/xfs/2000-10/msg00035.html (8,329 bytes)

3. Re: TAKE - add kgcc line for RH 7.0 (score: 1)
Author: Thomas Graichen <news-innominate.list.sgi.xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 3 Oct 2000 15:51:30 GMT
maybe the same for 2.96 (redhat 7.0) too which as far as i remember from here also has problems ... t p.s.: maybe we should also add an arch check there too - because on ppc it seems to work (without
/archives/xfs/2000-10/msg00038.html (9,901 bytes)

4. Re: TAKE - add kgcc line for RH 7.0 (score: 1)
Author: kris buggenhout <gast6@xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2000 09:10:39 +0200
I wonder what the problem is ... 2.95.2 And I have built all versions since the first oss release of XFS... ? I havent met any problems ... doing just an XFS compile... I believe the issues are more
/archives/xfs/2000-10/msg00066.html (9,328 bytes)

5. TAKE - add kgcc line for RH 7.0 (score: 1)
Author: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 16:43:25 -0500
The following file(s) were checked into: bonnie.engr.sgi.com:/isms/slinx/2.4.x-xfs Also changed extraversion to XFS-test8 Modid: 2.4.x-xfs:slinx:75481a linux/Makefile - 1.68 - Add compile line "kgcc"
/archives/xfs/2000-10/msg00242.html (6,960 bytes)

6. Re: TAKE - add kgcc line for RH 7.0 (score: 1)
Author: "Andi Kleen" <ak@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 14:11:40 +0200
Hallo Russell, Could you please put somewhere into the XFS Beta module something like This should save the users of distributions which come with 2.95 by default (SuSE, newer Debian, probably others)
/archives/xfs/2000-10/msg00255.html (8,329 bytes)

7. Re: TAKE - add kgcc line for RH 7.0 (score: 1)
Author: Thomas Graichen <news-innominate.list.sgi.xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 3 Oct 2000 15:51:30 GMT
maybe the same for 2.96 (redhat 7.0) too which as far as i remember from here also has problems ... t p.s.: maybe we should also add an arch check there too - because on ppc it seems to work (without
/archives/xfs/2000-10/msg00258.html (9,901 bytes)

8. Re: TAKE - add kgcc line for RH 7.0 (score: 1)
Author: kris buggenhout <gast6@xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2000 09:10:39 +0200
I wonder what the problem is ... 2.95.2 And I have built all versions since the first oss release of XFS... ? I havent met any problems ... doing just an XFS compile... I believe the issues are more
/archives/xfs/2000-10/msg00286.html (9,328 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu