Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*T\/TCP\s+Problems\s+can\s+be\s+solved\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*T\/TCP\s+Problems\s+can\s+be\s+solved\.\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. T/TCP Problems can be solved. (score: 1): Author: Laurence <laudney@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 11:10:0 +0800; On mlists.linux.kernel, on comp.os.linux.development.sys, I keep hearing from people who say T/TCP is fundamentally broken because it has various serious flaws: 1. T/TCP guesses an unreasonable windo; /archives/netdev/2002-02/msg00060.html (8,657 bytes)
2. Re: T/TCP Problems can be solved. (score: 1): Author: Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 21:45:40 -0700; For those of us who are ignorant of T/TCP, what are the benefits of the protocol (it has to be more than just not broken for me to get interested in it :)) Thanks, Ben Laurence wrote: On mlists.linux; /archives/netdev/2002-02/msg00061.html (10,430 bytes)
3. Re: T/TCP Problems can be solved. (score: 1): Author: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 17:40:37 -0800; For those of us who are ignorant of T/TCP, what are the benefits of the protocol (it has to be more than just not broken for me to get interested in it :)) For small transfers, the 'handshake/setup'; /archives/netdev/2002-02/msg00065.html (7,883 bytes)
4. Re: T/TCP Problems can be solved. (score: 1): Author: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 22:25:23 -0500 (EST); Your subject sounds exciting; i almost thought you invented something new; I read it and was disapointed to find you are just sounding like a salivating marketeer. BTW, fix you eol Less data to chew; /archives/netdev/2002-02/msg00067.html (9,993 bytes)
5. T/TCP Problems can be solved. (score: 1): Author: Laurence <laudney@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 11:10:0 +0800; On mlists.linux.kernel, on comp.os.linux.development.sys, I keep hearing from people who say T/TCP is fundamentally broken because it has various serious flaws: 1. T/TCP guesses an unreasonable windo; /archives/netdev/2002-02/msg00181.html (8,657 bytes)
6. Re: T/TCP Problems can be solved. (score: 1): Author: Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 21:45:40 -0700; For those of us who are ignorant of T/TCP, what are the benefits of the protocol (it has to be more than just not broken for me to get interested in it :)) Thanks, Ben On mlists.linux.kernel, on comp; /archives/netdev/2002-02/msg00182.html (9,958 bytes)
7. Re: T/TCP Problems can be solved. (score: 1): Author: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 17:40:37 -0800; For those of us who are ignorant of T/TCP, what are the benefits of the protocol (it has to be more than just not broken for me to get interested in it :)) For small transfers, the 'handshake/setup'; /archives/netdev/2002-02/msg00186.html (7,964 bytes)
8. Re: T/TCP Problems can be solved. (score: 1): Author: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 22:25:23 -0500 (EST); Your subject sounds exciting; i almost thought you invented something new; I read it and was disapointed to find you are just sounding like a salivating marketeer. BTW, fix you eol Less data to chew; /archives/netdev/2002-02/msg00188.html (10,026 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]