Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Suggestions\s+for\s+xfs\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. Suggestions for xfs (score: 1)
Author: "Daniel E." <baggadogio@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 13:53:03 +0100
Here are some suggestions for xfsprogs. Some people want xfs to be the standard file system for GNU/Linux. These changes will bring compatibility with other tools and file systems. You could take a l
/archives/xfs/2005-02/msg00001.html (9,441 bytes)

2. Re: Suggestions for xfs (score: 1)
Author: Net Llama! <netllama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 08:28:12 -0500 (EST)
Who wants this? Linux has no standard filesystem, so I don' see how this could ever be possible. -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Lonni J Friedman netllama@xx
/archives/xfs/2005-02/msg00002.html (8,140 bytes)

3. Re: Suggestions for xfs (score: 1)
Author: Mike Burger <mburger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 15:30:39 -0500 (EST)
Actually, wouldn't it be safe to say that ext2 is/was the standard FS under linux. After all, unless you specify that you want to use an alternate filesystem, under any distribution, ext2 (maybe ext3
/archives/xfs/2005-02/msg00005.html (8,995 bytes)

4. RE: Suggestions for xfs (score: 1)
Author: "Wilkins, Vern" <vwilkins@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 15:34:03 -0500
I believe that's not the case. There are several distributions now that use XFS and/or reiser as the default filesystem. I think Suse uses Reiser as the default, for example. --Original Message-- Fro
/archives/xfs/2005-02/msg00006.html (8,888 bytes)

5. Re: Suggestions for xfs (score: 1)
Author: Net Llama! <netllama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 14:19:01 -0500 (EST)
Perhaps 5+ years ago, when there were no other choices. I'm pretty sure that Mandrake, or some other quasi-mainstream distro uses ReiserFS by default. -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/archives/xfs/2005-02/msg00007.html (9,178 bytes)

6. Re: Suggestions for xfs (score: 1)
Author: Robert Brockway <rbrockway@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 20:43:54 +0000 (GMT)
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, Mike Burger wrote: Actually, wouldn't it be safe to say that ext2 is/was the standard FS under linux. After all, unless you specify that you want to use an alternate filesystem, u
/archives/xfs/2005-02/msg00008.html (9,128 bytes)

7. Re: Suggestions for xfs (score: 1)
Author: Net Llama! <netllama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 14:39:41 -0500 (EST)
I'm not a big fan of ext2/3 by any means, but i think its a bit near-sighted to assume that ext2/3 won't evolve in the3 future to better handle larger filesystems. -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/archives/xfs/2005-02/msg00009.html (9,470 bytes)

8. Re: Suggestions for xfs (score: 1)
Author: Robert Brockway <rbrockway@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 21:37:21 +0000 (GMT)
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, Net Llama! wrote: I'm not a big fan of ext2/3 by any means, but i think its a bit near-sighted to assume that ext2/3 won't evolve in the3 future to better handle larger filesystem
/archives/xfs/2005-02/msg00010.html (9,759 bytes)

9. Suggestions for xfs (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 13:53:03 +0100
Here are some suggestions for xfsprogs. Some people want xfs to be the standard file system for GNU/Linux. These changes will bring compatibility with other tools and file systems. You could take a l
/archives/xfs/2005-02/msg00158.html (9,441 bytes)

10. Re: Suggestions for xfs (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 08:28:12 -0500 (EST)
Who wants this? Linux has no standard filesystem, so I don' see how this could ever be possible. -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Lonni J Friedman netllama@xx
/archives/xfs/2005-02/msg00159.html (8,140 bytes)

11. Re: Suggestions for xfs (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 15:30:39 -0500 (EST)
Actually, wouldn't it be safe to say that ext2 is/was the standard FS under linux. After all, unless you specify that you want to use an alternate filesystem, under any distribution, ext2 (maybe ext3
/archives/xfs/2005-02/msg00162.html (8,995 bytes)

12. RE: Suggestions for xfs (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 15:34:03 -0500
I believe that's not the case. There are several distributions now that use XFS and/or reiser as the default filesystem. I think Suse uses Reiser as the default, for example. --Original Message-- Fro
/archives/xfs/2005-02/msg00163.html (8,888 bytes)

13. Re: Suggestions for xfs (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 14:19:01 -0500 (EST)
Perhaps 5+ years ago, when there were no other choices. I'm pretty sure that Mandrake, or some other quasi-mainstream distro uses ReiserFS by default. -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/archives/xfs/2005-02/msg00164.html (9,178 bytes)

14. Re: Suggestions for xfs (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 20:43:54 +0000 (GMT)
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, Mike Burger wrote: Actually, wouldn't it be safe to say that ext2 is/was the standard FS under linux. After all, unless you specify that you want to use an alternate filesystem, u
/archives/xfs/2005-02/msg00165.html (9,128 bytes)

15. Re: Suggestions for xfs (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 14:39:41 -0500 (EST)
I'm not a big fan of ext2/3 by any means, but i think its a bit near-sighted to assume that ext2/3 won't evolve in the3 future to better handle larger filesystems. -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/archives/xfs/2005-02/msg00166.html (9,470 bytes)

16. Re: Suggestions for xfs (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 21:37:21 +0000 (GMT)
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, Net Llama! wrote: I'm not a big fan of ext2/3 by any means, but i think its a bit near-sighted to assume that ext2/3 won't evolve in the3 future to better handle larger filesystem
/archives/xfs/2005-02/msg00167.html (9,759 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu