Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Suggestions\s+for\s+xfs\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Suggestions\s+for\s+xfs\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. Suggestions for xfs (score: 1): Author: "Daniel E." <baggadogio@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 13:53:03 +0100; Here are some suggestions for xfsprogs. Some people want xfs to be the standard file system for GNU/Linux. These changes will bring compatibility with other tools and file systems. You could take a l; /archives/xfs/2005-02/msg00001.html (9,441 bytes)
2. Re: Suggestions for xfs (score: 1): Author: Net Llama! <netllama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 08:28:12 -0500 (EST); Who wants this? Linux has no standard filesystem, so I don' see how this could ever be possible. -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Lonni J Friedman netllama@xx; /archives/xfs/2005-02/msg00002.html (8,140 bytes)
3. Re: Suggestions for xfs (score: 1): Author: Mike Burger <mburger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 15:30:39 -0500 (EST); Actually, wouldn't it be safe to say that ext2 is/was the standard FS under linux. After all, unless you specify that you want to use an alternate filesystem, under any distribution, ext2 (maybe ext3; /archives/xfs/2005-02/msg00005.html (8,995 bytes)
4. RE: Suggestions for xfs (score: 1): Author: "Wilkins, Vern" <vwilkins@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 15:34:03 -0500; I believe that's not the case. There are several distributions now that use XFS and/or reiser as the default filesystem. I think Suse uses Reiser as the default, for example. --Original Message-- Fro; /archives/xfs/2005-02/msg00006.html (8,888 bytes)
5. Re: Suggestions for xfs (score: 1): Author: Net Llama! <netllama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 14:19:01 -0500 (EST); Perhaps 5+ years ago, when there were no other choices. I'm pretty sure that Mandrake, or some other quasi-mainstream distro uses ReiserFS by default. -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~; /archives/xfs/2005-02/msg00007.html (9,178 bytes)
6. Re: Suggestions for xfs (score: 1): Author: Robert Brockway <rbrockway@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 20:43:54 +0000 (GMT); On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, Mike Burger wrote: Actually, wouldn't it be safe to say that ext2 is/was the standard FS under linux. After all, unless you specify that you want to use an alternate filesystem, u; /archives/xfs/2005-02/msg00008.html (9,128 bytes)
7. Re: Suggestions for xfs (score: 1): Author: Net Llama! <netllama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 14:39:41 -0500 (EST); I'm not a big fan of ext2/3 by any means, but i think its a bit near-sighted to assume that ext2/3 won't evolve in the3 future to better handle larger filesystems. -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~; /archives/xfs/2005-02/msg00009.html (9,470 bytes)
8. Re: Suggestions for xfs (score: 1): Author: Robert Brockway <rbrockway@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 21:37:21 +0000 (GMT); On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, Net Llama! wrote: I'm not a big fan of ext2/3 by any means, but i think its a bit near-sighted to assume that ext2/3 won't evolve in the3 future to better handle larger filesystem; /archives/xfs/2005-02/msg00010.html (9,759 bytes)
9. Suggestions for xfs (score: 1): Author:; Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 13:53:03 +0100; Here are some suggestions for xfsprogs. Some people want xfs to be the standard file system for GNU/Linux. These changes will bring compatibility with other tools and file systems. You could take a l; /archives/xfs/2005-02/msg00158.html (9,441 bytes)
10. Re: Suggestions for xfs (score: 1): Author:; Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 08:28:12 -0500 (EST); Who wants this? Linux has no standard filesystem, so I don' see how this could ever be possible. -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Lonni J Friedman netllama@xx; /archives/xfs/2005-02/msg00159.html (8,140 bytes)
11. Re: Suggestions for xfs (score: 1): Author:; Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 15:30:39 -0500 (EST); Actually, wouldn't it be safe to say that ext2 is/was the standard FS under linux. After all, unless you specify that you want to use an alternate filesystem, under any distribution, ext2 (maybe ext3; /archives/xfs/2005-02/msg00162.html (8,995 bytes)
12. RE: Suggestions for xfs (score: 1): Author:; Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 15:34:03 -0500; I believe that's not the case. There are several distributions now that use XFS and/or reiser as the default filesystem. I think Suse uses Reiser as the default, for example. --Original Message-- Fro; /archives/xfs/2005-02/msg00163.html (8,888 bytes)
13. Re: Suggestions for xfs (score: 1): Author:; Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 14:19:01 -0500 (EST); Perhaps 5+ years ago, when there were no other choices. I'm pretty sure that Mandrake, or some other quasi-mainstream distro uses ReiserFS by default. -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~; /archives/xfs/2005-02/msg00164.html (9,178 bytes)
14. Re: Suggestions for xfs (score: 1): Author:; Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 20:43:54 +0000 (GMT); On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, Mike Burger wrote: Actually, wouldn't it be safe to say that ext2 is/was the standard FS under linux. After all, unless you specify that you want to use an alternate filesystem, u; /archives/xfs/2005-02/msg00165.html (9,128 bytes)
15. Re: Suggestions for xfs (score: 1): Author:; Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 14:39:41 -0500 (EST); I'm not a big fan of ext2/3 by any means, but i think its a bit near-sighted to assume that ext2/3 won't evolve in the3 future to better handle larger filesystems. -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~; /archives/xfs/2005-02/msg00166.html (9,470 bytes)
16. Re: Suggestions for xfs (score: 1): Author:; Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 21:37:21 +0000 (GMT); On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, Net Llama! wrote: I'm not a big fan of ext2/3 by any means, but i think its a bit near-sighted to assume that ext2/3 won't evolve in the3 future to better handle larger filesystem; /archives/xfs/2005-02/msg00167.html (9,759 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 16
Page: [1]