Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Strange\s+behavior\s+on\s+the\s+2\.4\.18\s+XFS\s+tree\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Strange\s+behavior\s+on\s+the\s+2\.4\.18\s+XFS\s+tree\?\s*$/: 28 ]

Total 28 documents matching your query.

1. t xfs :P (score: 1): Author: Michael Sinz <msinz@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 07:30:09 -0400; f the device, and s is the speed (in 150kB/s units) of the writer. --; /archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00243.html (9,216 bytes)
2. H7.3 installer - question (score: 1): Author: Michael Sinz <msinz@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 08:16:55 -0400; u are right in your opinion on Mandrake. But for some reasons I cant switch my distribution. I'm using RH since 1997, I was evaluating misc others, Mandrake is cool but I must use RH. Reg; /archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00248.html (9,910 bytes)
3. r on the 2.4.18 XFS tree? (score: 1): Author: Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 22:35:16 +1000; wrote: I have only been able to see this behavior on my system running the kernel from the 2.4 XFS CVS tree. It is somewhat reproduceable. The problem is that I started up a number of "r; /archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00249.html (9,115 bytes)
4. tree? (score: 1): Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: 15 May 2002 08:39:00 -0500; trange requirement and are attempting to use XFS with our Linux system. Now, the requirement comes in, due to a rank amateur creating a computer generated system which creates files in ex; /archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00251.html (10,004 bytes)
5. XFS Mailing List Archive (score: 1): Author: Michael Sinz <msinz@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 14:11:10 -0400; orry about that. oss got rebuilt, all the tweaks we had to make things work got broken, it seems. Slowly rediscovering them all. -Eric -- Eric Sandeen XFS for Linux http://oss.sgi.com/pro; /archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00261.html (11,190 bytes)
6. r on the 2.4.18 XFS tree? (score: 1): Author: Michael Sinz <msinz@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 14:14:05 -0400; rote: On Wed, 2002-05-15 at 07:35, Keith Owens wrote: On Wed, 15 May 2002 07:30:09 -0400, Michael Sinz <msinz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: I have only been able to see this behavior on my system run; /archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00262.html (10,032 bytes)
7. ly one filename per inode (score: 1): Author: Charles Shannon Hendrix <shannon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 15:38:27 -0400; page, it says you can, but might get error messages. As for the multiple names for an inode, I suspect it is just written to stop after one name is found. If you use it without the -i it; /archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00266.html (10,715 bytes)
8. ? (score: 1): Author: Michael Sinz <msinz@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 13:57:44 -0400; geli wrote: On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 10:26:46AM -0500, Stephen Lord wrote: On Thu, 2002-05-16 at 10:17, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 09:50:31AM -0400, Jim Eshleman wrote; /archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00286.html (10,805 bytes)
9. t (score: 1): Author: Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 10:16:30 +1000; for sure it even changed anything. In fact, I really don't believe the upgrade to 2.2.4 actually did anything. Today I looked through the files again, and I really think the results were; /archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00300.html (10,017 bytes)
10. e: xfsdump sample scripts (score: 1): Author: Wessel Dankers <wsl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 16:34:45 +0200; ied the file on Tueday, then you could simply restore the Wednesday backup (which backs up Tuesday's files) If you lost your system entirely, then you would want to iteratively restore fr; /archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00312.html (9,066 bytes)
11. ]: xfsdump sample scripts (score: 1): Author: Charles Shannon Hendrix <shannon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 12:13:02 -0400; e very helpfull. Thanks. One problem is that you are calling e2fsck if I read your script correctly. I don't think that works with xfs. xfs_check would be a better choice I think. I don't; /archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00317.html (10,092 bytes)
12. Re: XFS in the 2.5 kernel (score: 1): Author: Michael Sinz <msinz@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 08:34:03 -0400; asically useable by other filesystems. For example I think I could port JFS to use it as backing for it's metapges - it just far too complex for JFS's needs so I don't see any point in do; /archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00350.html (10,174 bytes)
13. with ONSTREAM ADR50 drive (score: 1): Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: 20 May 2002 12:38:48 -0500; ng Mandrake 8.2 with the 1.1 xfs from SGI in a vanilla 2.4.18 kernel. If I try to do a xfsdump it fails with xfsdump: creating dump session media file 0 (media 0, file 0) xfsdump: dumping; /archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00362.html (10,791 bytes)
14. quota under Debian stable (score: 1): Author: Michael Sinz <msinz@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 10:53:47 -0400; kgcc as I was told that the stack trace was borked. The problem still existed with or without xfs_freeze; /archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00593.html (11,892 bytes)
15. srestore problems (score: 1): Author: Michael Sinz <msinz@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 07:30:09 -0400; cremental, sub-path specification, and full restores. Inc; /archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00881.html (9,216 bytes)
16. installer - question (score: 1): Author: Michael Sinz <msinz@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 08:16:55 -0400; all without disk swapping, go for Mandrake 8.2. You can install a basic system with only the first CD of the download edition. It offers You a choice of journaling file system; /archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00886.html (9,910 bytes)
17. estion (score: 1): Author: Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 22:35:16 +1000; in your opinion on Mandrake. But for some reasons I cant switch my distribution. I'm using RH since 1997, I was evaluating misc others, Mandrake is cool but I must use RH. Reg; /archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00887.html (9,115 bytes)
18. behavior on the 2.4.18 XFS tree? (score: 1): Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: 15 May 2002 08:39:00 -0500; , does typing sync get everything running again? I have been seeing an intermittent lock problem with XFS where everything stops until some other disk activity kicks in and the; /archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00889.html (10,004 bytes)
19. oss is broken (score: 1): Author: Michael Sinz <msinz@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 14:11:10 -0400; m/projects/xfs/mail_archive/200205/threads.html Mason error error in file: /oss/www/projects/xfs/mail_archive/200205/threads.html line 723: '<%' with no matching '%>' context:; /archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00899.html (11,190 bytes)
20. rchive (score: 1): Author: Michael Sinz <msinz@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 14:14:05 -0400; hat. oss got rebuilt, all the tweaks we had to make things work got broken, it seems. Slowly rediscovering them all. -Eric -- Eric Sandeen XFS for Linux http://oss.sgi.com/pro; /archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00900.html (10,032 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]