Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Strange\s+XFS\s+issue\s+on\s+tiny\-NAS\s+ARM\s+NFS\s+server\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Strange\s+XFS\s+issue\s+on\s+tiny\-NAS\s+ARM\s+NFS\s+server\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. Strange XFS issue on tiny-NAS ARM NFS server (score: 1): Author: "Talpey, Thomas" <Thomas.Talpey@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 12:11:56 -0400; This might be pilot error, but a *very* strange thing happens with an XFS filesystem on an NFS server I'm experimenting with. This is an NSLU2 ARM-based machine, running 2.6.20.1 and an XFS filesyste; /archives/xfs/2007-03/msg00051.html (11,730 bytes)
2. Re: Strange XFS issue on tiny-NAS ARM NFS server (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 15:32:58 -0500; Talpey, Thomas wrote: This might be pilot error, but a *very* strange thing happens with an XFS filesystem on an NFS server I'm experimenting with. This is an NSLU2 ARM-based machine, running 2.6.20.; /archives/xfs/2007-03/msg00053.html (8,935 bytes)
3. Re: Strange XFS issue on tiny-NAS ARM NFS server (score: 1): Author: "Talpey, Thomas" <Thomas.Talpey@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 17:19:20 -0400; Wow good memory, 3 years ago: <http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2004-March/020287.html> Thanks! BTW, XFS gives this little machine a nice bump in NFS write bandwidth. Goes fro; /archives/xfs/2007-03/msg00054.html (9,734 bytes)
4. Re: Strange XFS issue on tiny-NAS ARM NFS server (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 16:21:59 -0500; Talpey, Thomas wrote: Wow good memory, 3 years ago: <http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2004-March/020287.html> I'm compiling with gcc4.1.1 for arm5t big endian, patched for mul; /archives/xfs/2007-03/msg00055.html (9,379 bytes)
5. Re: Strange XFS issue on tiny-NAS ARM NFS server (score: 1): Author: "Talpey, Thomas" <Thomas.Talpey@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 17:31:39 -0400; Nope, but they sure are instructive platforms for expermenting with Linux. Their memory bandwidth is so low (and they only have 32MB of it) that little things make a big difference. Tom.; /archives/xfs/2007-03/msg00056.html (8,802 bytes)
6. Re: Strange XFS issue on tiny-NAS ARM NFS server (score: 1): Author: "Talpey, Thomas" <Thomas.Talpey@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 07:34:37 -0400; Evidently that was not the only compiling issue (surprise): Oh, well. Tom.; /archives/xfs/2007-03/msg00060.html (10,896 bytes)
7. Re: Strange XFS issue on tiny-NAS ARM NFS server (score: 1): Author: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 09:59:59 +1100; That's a long way past the end of the partition. Tom, did you run xfs_repair on that filesystem after running with a busted compiler? Who knows how it broke stuff on disk..... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave C; /archives/xfs/2007-03/msg00081.html (9,598 bytes)
8. Re: Strange XFS issue on tiny-NAS ARM NFS server (score: 1): Author: "Talpey, Thomas" <Thomas.Talpey@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 07:30:28 -0400; No, this was a freshly rebuilt ~80GB xfs. I was running a test on it over NFS which wrote and read 500MB files repeatedly. And, it ran for quite some time before failing. I haven't had a chance to tr; /archives/xfs/2007-03/msg00095.html (9,522 bytes)
9. Strange XFS issue on tiny-NAS ARM NFS server (score: 1): Author: "Talpey, Thomas" <Thomas.Talpey@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 12:11:56 -0400; This might be pilot error, but a *very* strange thing happens with an XFS filesystem on an NFS server I'm experimenting with. This is an NSLU2 ARM-based machine, running 2.6.20.1 and an XFS filesyste; /archives/xfs/2007-03/msg00281.html (11,730 bytes)
10. Re: Strange XFS issue on tiny-NAS ARM NFS server (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 15:32:58 -0500; Talpey, Thomas wrote: This might be pilot error, but a *very* strange thing happens with an XFS filesystem on an NFS server I'm experimenting with. This is an NSLU2 ARM-based machine, running 2.6.20.; /archives/xfs/2007-03/msg00283.html (8,935 bytes)
11. Re: Strange XFS issue on tiny-NAS ARM NFS server (score: 1): Author: "Talpey, Thomas" <Thomas.Talpey@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 17:19:20 -0400; Wow good memory, 3 years ago: <http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2004-March/020287.html> Thanks! BTW, XFS gives this little machine a nice bump in NFS write bandwidth. Goes fro; /archives/xfs/2007-03/msg00284.html (9,734 bytes)
12. Re: Strange XFS issue on tiny-NAS ARM NFS server (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 16:21:59 -0500; Talpey, Thomas wrote: Wow good memory, 3 years ago: <http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2004-March/020287.html> I'm compiling with gcc4.1.1 for arm5t big endian, patched for mul; /archives/xfs/2007-03/msg00285.html (9,379 bytes)
13. Re: Strange XFS issue on tiny-NAS ARM NFS server (score: 1): Author: "Talpey, Thomas" <Thomas.Talpey@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 17:31:39 -0400; Nope, but they sure are instructive platforms for expermenting with Linux. Their memory bandwidth is so low (and they only have 32MB of it) that little things make a big difference. Tom.; /archives/xfs/2007-03/msg00286.html (8,802 bytes)
14. Re: Strange XFS issue on tiny-NAS ARM NFS server (score: 1): Author: "Talpey, Thomas" <Thomas.Talpey@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 07:34:37 -0400; Evidently that was not the only compiling issue (surprise): Oh, well. Tom.; /archives/xfs/2007-03/msg00290.html (10,896 bytes)
15. Re: Strange XFS issue on tiny-NAS ARM NFS server (score: 1): Author: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 09:59:59 +1100; That's a long way past the end of the partition. Tom, did you run xfs_repair on that filesystem after running with a busted compiler? Who knows how it broke stuff on disk..... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave C; /archives/xfs/2007-03/msg00311.html (9,598 bytes)
16. Re: Strange XFS issue on tiny-NAS ARM NFS server (score: 1): Author: "Talpey, Thomas" <Thomas.Talpey@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 07:30:28 -0400; No, this was a freshly rebuilt ~80GB xfs. I was running a test on it over NFS which wrote and read 500MB files repeatedly. And, it ran for quite some time before failing. I haven't had a chance to tr; /archives/xfs/2007-03/msg00325.html (9,522 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 16
Page: [1]