Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Still\s+bug\-hunting\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Still\s+bug\-hunting\s*$/: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. Still bug-hunting (score: 1): Author: ek Radouch <zdenek@xxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 18:57:00 +0100; I have found out that the slow-down issue with many sockets is a memory problem now. Not that I do not have enough but the vm isnt able to reclaim fast-enough. Problem temporarily solved by setting; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg00274.html (8,189 bytes)
2. Re: Still bug-hunting (score: 1): Author: bmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2005 10:29:18 -0800; Thanks for the test case we asked for.; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg00276.html (8,101 bytes)
3. Re: Still bug-hunting (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx (Olof Johansson); Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 19:54:49 +0100; You as an expert should know that this is no one-liner. It is a very complex server with multiplexing and forking like Apache. I dont feel like writing an apache-like program just for testing. I hope; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg00282.html (9,327 bytes)
4. Re: Still bug-hunting (score: 1): Author: @xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2005 10:57:06 -0800; You could give us the program you actually used, no writing necessary. Obviously you had this program, else you wouldn't have anything to report at all. There's nothing "to write", you have it alread; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg00283.html (9,317 bytes)
5. Re: Still bug-hunting (score: 1): Author: vem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 20:07:00 +0100; Actually we are a company and the big ones decided to buy new servers to work-around this bug. This is a common technique in companies. I say this sucks and thats why I experienced in our production; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg00285.html (10,411 bytes)
6. Re: Still bug-hunting (score: 1): Author: fortuna@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2005 20:57:12 +0100; * Christian Schmid <422A0354.3080800@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2005-03-05 20:07 It's quite simple, provide a test case and someone will start looking into the problem (given there is one). The information you; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg00288.html (9,617 bytes)
7. Re: Still bug-hunting (score: 1): Author: r <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 21:04:12 +0100; Thomas Graf wrote: * Christian Schmid <422A0354.3080800@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2005-03-05 20:07 Actually we are a company and the big ones decided to buy new servers to work-around this bug. This is a commo; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg00289.html (10,318 bytes)
8. Re: Still bug-hunting (score: 1): Author: af@xxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2005 21:32:17 +0100; Christian Schmid <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> : Simple answer: rewrite alloc_skb and friends. -- Ueimor; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg00290.html (9,411 bytes)
9. Re: Still bug-hunting (score: 1): Author: @xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 21:40:25 +0100; In less-rude words: "No, this is not easy. No way, sorry." Thank you for this information. I have sent very detailed bug-reports to LKML. Maybe you have read already. Francois Romieu wrote: Christian; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg00291.html (10,215 bytes)
10. Re: Still bug-hunting (score: 1): Author: nzano <webvenza@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2005 22:22:05 +0100; Christian Schmid <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> : If you can not distinguish a factual answer from a flame, it is time to take a break. [...] Just done so but I fail to see if you provided N. Piggin with; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg00296.html (9,911 bytes)
11. Still bug-hunting (score: 1): Author: Christian Schmid <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 18:57:00 +0100; Hello. I have found out that the slow-down issue with many sockets is a memory problem now. Not that I do not have enough but the vm isnt able to reclaim fast-enough. Problem temporarily solved by se; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg02197.html (8,203 bytes)
12. Re: Still bug-hunting (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2005 10:29:18 -0800; Thanks for the test case we asked for.; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg02199.html (8,149 bytes)
13. Re: Still bug-hunting (score: 1): Author: Christian Schmid <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 19:54:49 +0100; You as an expert should know that this is no one-liner. It is a very complex server with multiplexing and forking like Apache. I dont feel like writing an apache-like program just for testing. I hope; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg02205.html (9,615 bytes)
14. Re: Still bug-hunting (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2005 10:57:06 -0800; You could give us the program you actually used, no writing necessary. Obviously you had this program, else you wouldn't have anything to report at all. There's nothing "to write", you have it alread; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg02206.html (9,543 bytes)
15. Re: Still bug-hunting (score: 1): Author: Christian Schmid <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 20:07:00 +0100; Actually we are a company and the big ones decided to buy new servers to work-around this bug. This is a common technique in companies. I say this sucks and thats why I experienced in our production; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg02208.html (10,630 bytes)
16. Re: Still bug-hunting (score: 1): Author: Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2005 20:57:12 +0100; * Christian Schmid <422A0354.3080800@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2005-03-05 20:07 It's quite simple, provide a test case and someone will start looking into the problem (given there is one). The information you; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg02211.html (9,904 bytes)
17. Re: Still bug-hunting (score: 1): Author: Christian Schmid <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 21:04:12 +0100; Actually we are a company and the big ones decided to buy new servers to work-around this bug. This is a common technique in companies. I say this sucks and thats why I experienced in our production; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg02212.html (10,725 bytes)
18. Re: Still bug-hunting (score: 1): Author: Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2005 21:32:17 +0100; Christian Schmid <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> : [...] Simple answer: rewrite alloc_skb and friends. -- Ueimor; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg02213.html (9,752 bytes)
19. Re: Still bug-hunting (score: 1): Author: Christian Schmid <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 21:40:25 +0100; In less-rude words: "No, this is not easy. No way, sorry." Thank you for this information. I have sent very detailed bug-reports to LKML. Maybe you have read already. I just asked for a way how to ch; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg02214.html (10,580 bytes)
20. Re: Still bug-hunting (score: 1): Author: Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2005 22:22:05 +0100; Christian Schmid <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> : If you can not distinguish a factual answer from a flame, it is time to take a break. [...] Just done so but I fail to see if you provided N. Piggin with; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg02219.html (10,282 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1]