Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Spam\s+on\s+list\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Spam\s+on\s+list\?\s*$/: 22 ]

Total 22 documents matching your query.

1. Spam on list? (score: 1): Author: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2007 08:25:04 -0500 (EST); Who runs the XFS mailing list admin-wise? Could we add some basic anti-spam measures, I am not subscribed to many mailing lists but this one seems to generate the most spam. Any chance they'd conside; /archives/xfs/2007-02/msg00019.html (7,507 bytes)
2. Re: Spam on list? (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2007 12:44:18 -0600; Justin Piszcz wrote: Who runs the XFS mailing list admin-wise? A cabal... Could we add some basic anti-spam measures, I am not subscribed to many mailing lists but this one seems to generate the most; /archives/xfs/2007-02/msg00020.html (8,845 bytes)
3. Re: Spam on list? (score: 1): Author: Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2007 20:18:08 +0100; Le Sun, 04 Feb 2007 12:44:18 -0600 vous écriviez: All other lists I'm following do so, and nobody complains. -- -- Emmanuel Florac www.intellique.com -; /archives/xfs/2007-02/msg00021.html (8,507 bytes)
4. Re: Spam on list? (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2007 15:46:21 -0600; Eric Sandeen wrote: There are actually many spam measures in place... spamassassin, and others, but it seems they just can't keep up. In the meantime we added another measure today, we'll see if it h; /archives/xfs/2007-02/msg00022.html (8,513 bytes)
5. Re: Spam on list? (score: 1): Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>; Date: 05 Feb 2007 11:32:25 +0100; Please don't do that. It means nothing can be cross posted from l-k anymore, which would be pretty bad. -Andi; /archives/xfs/2007-02/msg00025.html (8,279 bytes)
6. Re: Spam on list? (score: 1): Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 13:06:30 +0100; That adds unacceptable latency. Also lists who spam senders with bounce messages tend to be dropped quickly from cc lists. Also you couldn't list xfs@ as bug report address anymore because bug report; /archives/xfs/2007-02/msg00026.html (8,927 bytes)
7. Re: Spam on list? (score: 1): Author: "Martin Schröder" <martin@xxxxxxxxxx; Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 12:52:32 +0100; 05 Feb 2007 11:32:25 +0100, Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>: Please don't do that. It means nothing can be cross posted from l-k anymore, which would be pretty bad. Then set up a list admin who can approve s; /archives/xfs/2007-02/msg00027.html (9,201 bytes)
8. Re: Spam on list? (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2007 08:18:33 -0600; Andi Kleen wrote: On Monday 05 February 2007 12:52, Martin Schröder wrote: 05 Feb 2007 11:32:25 +0100, Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>: Please don't do that. It means nothing can be cross posted from l-k a; /archives/xfs/2007-02/msg00028.html (9,849 bytes)
9. Re: Spam on list? (score: 1): Author: Sami Farin <safari-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 23:29:06 +0200; Those 419 scams and phishes are caught by for example a bayesian filter. That's what I have done since 2003. As for the "only subscribers can post" as an anti-spam measure, I can say that for those m; /archives/xfs/2007-02/msg00032.html (10,962 bytes)
10. Re: Spam on list? (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2007 17:47:52 -0600; Nathan Scott wrote: On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 08:18 -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: Andi Kleen wrote: On Monday 05 February 2007 12:52, Martin SchrÃder wrote: 05 Feb 2007 11:32:25 +0100, Andi Kleen <ak@xxxx; /archives/xfs/2007-02/msg00033.html (10,129 bytes)
11. Re: Spam on list? (score: 1): Author: Jason White <jasonjgw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 09:59:14 +0000 (UTC); I agree. Posting from Gmane (nntp://news.gmane.org/) is also desirable, and (relatively) safe as it implements a challenge/response procedure and has other anti-spam controls. Is it possible to confi; /archives/xfs/2007-02/msg00034.html (8,600 bytes)
12. Spam on list? (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2007 08:25:04 -0500 (EST); h; /archives/xfs/2007-02/msg00155.html (7,507 bytes)
13. Re: Spam on list? (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2007 12:44:18 -0600; e; /archives/xfs/2007-02/msg00156.html (8,845 bytes)
14. Re: Spam on list? (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2007 20:18:08 +0100; t; /archives/xfs/2007-02/msg00157.html (8,507 bytes)
15. Re: Spam on list? (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2007 15:46:21 -0600; -; /archives/xfs/2007-02/msg00158.html (8,513 bytes)
16. Re: Spam on list? (score: 1): Author: >; Date: 05 Feb 2007 11:32:25 +0100; p; /archives/xfs/2007-02/msg00161.html (8,279 bytes)
17. Re: Spam on list? (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 13:06:30 +0100; i; /archives/xfs/2007-02/msg00162.html (8,927 bytes)
18. Re: Spam on list? (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 12:52:32 +0100; t; /archives/xfs/2007-02/msg00163.html (9,201 bytes)
19. Re: Spam on list? (score: 1): Author: x; Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2007 08:18:33 -0600; s; /archives/xfs/2007-02/msg00164.html (9,849 bytes)
20. Re: Spam on list? (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 23:29:06 +0200; .; /archives/xfs/2007-02/msg00168.html (10,962 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]