- 1. Re: Saving ACL's (score: 1)
- Author: Simon Matter <simon.matter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2002 09:02:03 +0200
- from mobile.sauter-bc.com (unknown [10.1.6.21]) by basel1.sauter-bc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7904457307; Mon, 3 Jun 2002 09:02:08 +0200 (CEST) Cc: linux-xfs <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> Organization:
- /archives/xfs/2002-06/msg00019.html (7,799 bytes)
- 2. clusion attribute (score: 1)
- Author: n@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 22:44:50 +0200
- s to be done via an extended attribute. thats a terribly foolish attitude, and will ensure XFS would never go into the mainline kernel. -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net
- /archives/xfs/2002-06/msg00322.html (7,072 bytes)
- 3. t software (score: 1)
- Author: es@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2002 09:02:03 +0200
- tested it with a just checked out CVS version and this patch, but still getting almost the same thing... For example when extracting a kernel
- /archives/xfs/2002-06/msg00523.html (7,799 bytes)
- 4. ere is the 2.4.19-pre9 or 10 patch? (score: 1)
- Author: deen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 22:44:50 +0200
- /isms/slinx/2.4.x-xfs Modid: 2.4.x-xfs:slinx:121630a linux/fs/xfs/xfs_alloc.c - 1.152 - add an extra last pass to the allocation group sca
- /archives/xfs/2002-06/msg00826.html (7,072 bytes)
- 5. Problems with 2.4.19-pre9 (score: 1)
- Author: Joseph Mesterhazy <jmesterh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 08:10:17 -0500
- t went in on May 24th caused the problems. I checked the tree out on the morning of 24 May and Steve dropped a few changes to get XFS out of the irq business later that day. I checked the
- /archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00611.html (7,179 bytes)
- 6. 2.4.19-pre9 (score: 1)
- Author: Joseph Mesterhazy <jmesterh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 08:14:42 -0500
- mple question. Are there any ACL aware commands for linux? It seems like the simple tools, eg. cp, tar, etc. do not preserve ACL's. This throws a wrench in my plans somewhat as I am servi
- /archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00612.html (7,846 bytes)
- 7. ng ACL's (score: 1)
- Author: Joshua Baker-LePain <jlb17@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 09:18:31 -0400 (EDT)
- found the answer to my question already. http://acl.bestbits.at has an updated fileutils with ACL support. (too early in the morning to be emailing to lists I suppose...) Joseph Mesterha
- /archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00613.html (7,356 bytes)
- 8. ng ACL's (score: 1)
- Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 15:26:20 +0200
- ACL support. (too early in the morning to be emailing to lists I suppose...) Joseph Mesterha
- /archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00614.html (7,412 bytes)
- 9. lems with 2.4.19-pre9 (score: 1)
- Author: Joseph Mesterhazy <jmesterh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 08:10:17 -0500
- e compiler as appears to be the cause of the other problem. I wish we had the window narrowed down to less than 5 weeks, a LOT of things have changed in XFS in that interval. S
- /archives/xfs/2002-05/msg01249.html (7,179 bytes)
- 10. .19-pre9 (score: 1)
- Author: Joseph Mesterhazy <jmesterh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 08:14:42 -0500
- n May 24th caused the problems. I checked the tree out on the morning of 24 May and Steve dropped a few changes to get XFS out of the irq business later that day. I checked the
- /archives/xfs/2002-05/msg01250.html (7,846 bytes)
- 11. lems with 2.4.19-pre9 (score: 1)
- Author: Joshua Baker-LePain <jlb17@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 09:18:31 -0400 (EDT)
- n. Are there any ACL aware commands for linux? It seems like the simple tools, eg. cp, tar, etc. do not preserve ACL's. This throws a wrench in my plans somewhat as I am servi
- /archives/xfs/2002-05/msg01251.html (7,356 bytes)
- 12. pre9 (score: 1)
- Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 15:26:20 +0200
- c. do not preserve ACL's. This throws a wrench in my plans somewhat as I am servi
- /archives/xfs/2002-05/msg01252.html (7,412 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu