Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Saving\s+ACL\'s\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Saving ACL's (score: 1)
Author: Simon Matter <simon.matter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2002 09:02:03 +0200
from mobile.sauter-bc.com (unknown [10.1.6.21]) by basel1.sauter-bc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7904457307; Mon, 3 Jun 2002 09:02:08 +0200 (CEST) Cc: linux-xfs <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> Organization:
/archives/xfs/2002-06/msg00019.html (7,799 bytes)

2. clusion attribute (score: 1)
Author: n@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 22:44:50 +0200
s to be done via an extended attribute. thats a terribly foolish attitude, and will ensure XFS would never go into the mainline kernel. -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net
/archives/xfs/2002-06/msg00322.html (7,072 bytes)

3. t software (score: 1)
Author: es@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2002 09:02:03 +0200
tested it with a just checked out CVS version and this patch, but still getting almost the same thing... For example when extracting a kernel
/archives/xfs/2002-06/msg00523.html (7,799 bytes)

4. ere is the 2.4.19-pre9 or 10 patch? (score: 1)
Author: deen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 22:44:50 +0200
/isms/slinx/2.4.x-xfs Modid: 2.4.x-xfs:slinx:121630a linux/fs/xfs/xfs_alloc.c - 1.152 - add an extra last pass to the allocation group sca
/archives/xfs/2002-06/msg00826.html (7,072 bytes)

5. Problems with 2.4.19-pre9 (score: 1)
Author: Joseph Mesterhazy <jmesterh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 08:10:17 -0500
t went in on May 24th caused the problems. I checked the tree out on the morning of 24 May and Steve dropped a few changes to get XFS out of the irq business later that day. I checked the
/archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00611.html (7,179 bytes)

6. 2.4.19-pre9 (score: 1)
Author: Joseph Mesterhazy <jmesterh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 08:14:42 -0500
mple question. Are there any ACL aware commands for linux? It seems like the simple tools, eg. cp, tar, etc. do not preserve ACL's. This throws a wrench in my plans somewhat as I am servi
/archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00612.html (7,846 bytes)

7. ng ACL's (score: 1)
Author: Joshua Baker-LePain <jlb17@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 09:18:31 -0400 (EDT)
found the answer to my question already. http://acl.bestbits.at has an updated fileutils with ACL support. (too early in the morning to be emailing to lists I suppose...) Joseph Mesterha
/archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00613.html (7,356 bytes)

8. ng ACL's (score: 1)
Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 15:26:20 +0200
ACL support. (too early in the morning to be emailing to lists I suppose...) Joseph Mesterha
/archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00614.html (7,412 bytes)

9. lems with 2.4.19-pre9 (score: 1)
Author: Joseph Mesterhazy <jmesterh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 08:10:17 -0500
e compiler as appears to be the cause of the other problem. I wish we had the window narrowed down to less than 5 weeks, a LOT of things have changed in XFS in that interval. S
/archives/xfs/2002-05/msg01249.html (7,179 bytes)

10. .19-pre9 (score: 1)
Author: Joseph Mesterhazy <jmesterh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 08:14:42 -0500
n May 24th caused the problems. I checked the tree out on the morning of 24 May and Steve dropped a few changes to get XFS out of the irq business later that day. I checked the
/archives/xfs/2002-05/msg01250.html (7,846 bytes)

11. lems with 2.4.19-pre9 (score: 1)
Author: Joshua Baker-LePain <jlb17@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 09:18:31 -0400 (EDT)
n. Are there any ACL aware commands for linux? It seems like the simple tools, eg. cp, tar, etc. do not preserve ACL's. This throws a wrench in my plans somewhat as I am servi
/archives/xfs/2002-05/msg01251.html (7,356 bytes)

12. pre9 (score: 1)
Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 15:26:20 +0200
c. do not preserve ACL's. This throws a wrench in my plans somewhat as I am servi
/archives/xfs/2002-05/msg01252.html (7,412 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu