Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*SIOCGIFCONF\s+and\s+IPv6\s+addresses\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*SIOCGIFCONF\s+and\s+IPv6\s+addresses\s*$/: 28 ]

Total 28 documents matching your query.

1. Re: SIOCGIFCONF and IPv6 addresses (score: 1): Author: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI (吉藤英明) <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2000 15:48:13 +0900; I've implemented *prototype* of getifaddr() for Linux 2.2 (or later) using PF_NETLINK socket (instead of RT_NET_IFLIST): <http://apps.v6.linux.or.jp/pub/Linux/glibc/getifaddrs-20000306.tgz>. We shou; /archives/netdev/2000-03/msg00011.html (8,501 bytes)
2. SIOCGIFCONF and IPv6 addresses (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2000 13:08:39 +0100; Currently Linux SIOCGIFCONF doesn't return any IPv6 addresses because sockaddr filled with ipv6 addr doesnt fit ... Kame guys said that it doesn't matter if we correctly parse output. IMHO simplest w; /archives/netdev/2000-02/msg00124.html (8,457 bytes)
3. Re: SIOCGIFCONF and IPv6 addresses (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2000 21:55:53 +0900; Hello, KAME people propose new function called getifaddrs(3). BSDI4 has it already to get local IPv6 addresses. I noticed that SIOCFIGCONF doesn't return IPv6 addresses and thinked of it. But I have; /archives/netdev/2000-02/msg00125.html (9,723 bytes)
4. Re: SIOCGIFCONF and IPv6 addresses (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2000 14:37:11 +0100; getifaddrs() could be implemented in user space using rtnetlink. -Andi; /archives/netdev/2000-02/msg00126.html (9,726 bytes)
5. Re: SIOCGIFCONF and IPv6 addresses (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2000 22:40:28 +0900; It might be done AFTER sin6_scope_id goes into the kernel. (Alexey, please, please take it into the kernel!) Alternatively, we may standardize / deploy new function like getifaddrs() on BSDi. -- Hide; /archives/netdev/2000-02/msg00127.html (9,600 bytes)
6. Re: SIOCGIFCONF and IPv6 addresses (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2000 20:25:44 +0300 (MSK); Function getting address list can be implemented via /proc/net/if_inet6. The question, how to call this function getifaddrs() or somewhat differently, does not make much of sense, because there is n; /archives/netdev/2000-02/msg00128.html (10,214 bytes)
7. Re: SIOCGIFCONF and IPv6 addresses (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2000 18:16:29 -0800; Hello, I'm not an expert of Solaris, but AFAIK, solaris always return the 16byte buffer by SIOCGIFCONF. Using SIOCGLIFCONF, it returns long buffer than 16byte. In order to get sockaddr_in6, we can us; /archives/netdev/2000-02/msg00130.html (10,322 bytes)
8. Re: SIOCGIFCONF and IPv6 addresses (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2000 14:38:33 +0300 (MSK); Oh! It sounds interesting. Is this extension specific to Solaris? Alexey; /archives/netdev/2000-02/msg00132.html (8,991 bytes)
9. Re: SIOCGIFCONF and IPv6 addresses (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxx; Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2000 21:07:17 +0900; KAME seems to have SIOC{AGD}LIFADDR and if_laddrreq{}. /* * Structure for SIOC[AGD]LIFADDR */ struct if_laddrreq { char iflr_name[IFNAMSIZ]; unsigned int flags; unsigned int prefixlen; /* in/out */; /archives/netdev/2000-02/msg00133.html (10,039 bytes)
10. Re: SIOCGIFCONF and IPv6 addresses (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2000 15:17:14 +0300 (MSK); It is strange. KAME is 4.4BSD, which has well-defined interface not requiring any additional letters "L" from its birthday. Alexey; /archives/netdev/2000-02/msg00134.html (8,979 bytes)
11. Re: SIOCGIFCONF and IPv6 addresses (score: 1): Author: t@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2000 22:28:21 +0900; I've seeked the source code: It says the interfaces are deprecated, but, literally, KAME have them. -- Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Web Page: http://www.ecei.tohoku.ac.jp/%7Eyoshfuj; /archives/netdev/2000-02/msg00136.html (9,731 bytes)
12. Re: SIOCGIFCONF and IPv6 addresses (score: 1): Author: sh" <mgm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2000 18:10:35 +0100; itojun please send information how on KAME SIOCGIFCONF ioctl() returns ipv6 adresses (how it's done with struct ifreq ?) etc ... -- Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz http://www.misiek.eu.org/ PLD/Linux [IPv6 enab; /archives/netdev/2000-02/msg00138.html (9,169 bytes)
13. Re: SIOCGIFCONF and IPv6 addresses (score: 1): Author: xiang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2000 14:06:13 +0900; /archives/netdev/2000-02/msg00144.html (14,187 bytes)
14. Re: SIOCGIFCONF and IPv6 addresses (score: 1): Author: <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 29 Feb 2000 19:14:01 +0100; /archives/netdev/2000-02/msg00169.html (8,732 bytes)
15. Re: SIOCGIFCONF and IPv6 addresses (score: 1): Author: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI () <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2000 15:48:13 +0900; Hi, I've implemented *prototype* of getifaddr() for Linux 2.2 (or later) using PF_NETLINK socket (instead of RT_NET_IFLIST): <http://apps.v6.linux.or.jp/pub/Linux/glibc/getifaddrs-20000306.tgz>. We s; /archives/netdev/2000-03/msg00096.html (8,688 bytes)
16. SIOCGIFCONF and IPv6 addresses (score: 1): Author: Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <misiek@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2000 13:08:39 +0100; Currently Linux SIOCGIFCONF doesn't return any IPv6 addresses because sockaddr filled with ipv6 addr doesnt fit ... Kame guys said that it doesn't matter if we correctly parse output. IMHO simplest w; /archives/netdev/2000-02/msg00295.html (8,487 bytes)
17. Re: SIOCGIFCONF and IPv6 addresses (score: 1): Author: Yuji Sekiya <sekiya@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2000 21:55:53 +0900; Hello, KAME people propose new function called getifaddrs(3). BSDI4 has it already to get local IPv6 addresses. I noticed that SIOCFIGCONF doesn't return IPv6 addresses and thinked of it. But I have; /archives/netdev/2000-02/msg00296.html (9,781 bytes)
18. Re: SIOCGIFCONF and IPv6 addresses (score: 1): Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2000 14:37:11 +0100; getifaddrs() could be implemented in user space using rtnetlink. -Andi; /archives/netdev/2000-02/msg00297.html (9,799 bytes)
19. Re: SIOCGIFCONF and IPv6 addresses (score: 1): Author: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2000 22:40:28 +0900; It might be done AFTER sin6_scope_id goes into the kernel. (Alexey, please, please take it into the kernel!) Alternatively, we may standardize / deploy new function like getifaddrs() on BSDi. -- Hide; /archives/netdev/2000-02/msg00298.html (9,673 bytes)
20. Re: SIOCGIFCONF and IPv6 addresses (score: 1): Author: kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2000 20:25:44 +0300 (MSK); Hello! Function getting address list can be implemented via /proc/net/if_inet6. The question, how to call this function getifaddrs() or somewhat differently, does not make much of sense, because ther; /archives/netdev/2000-02/msg00299.html (10,246 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]