I sent this earlier, but I got no reply, and can't seem to find it in the archives. If you reply to this, could you please copy both Kevin Dwyer and myself on the reply? Many thanks! Hi, Some folks u
On Thu, 15 Aug 2002, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx grunted something like: Since I'm the one who has primarily been chasing this problem, I'll explain. (cut from my original email...) Specifically, it uses ip
Hello! Yes, that one which is described in manual (and equivalent to corresponding ifconfig) ifconfig eth0:tra-ta-ta 10.x.y.z etc. Well, yes. Initialize ifreq with right address, for instance. Probab
On Thu, 15 Aug 2002, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx grunted something like: Thanks for the response... Perhaps I should clarify a bit further. When we are starting heartbeat, the interface is setup thusly: (I'
Why do you use the 'scope link' statements? And as far as your original question try the following: ip -f inet addr add 10.5.5.8/24 dev eth0 brd + ip -f inet addr add 10.5.5.1 dev eth0 scope link brd
On Sun, 18 Aug 2002, Matthew G. Marsh grunted something like: Why do I use the 'scope link' argument, or the statement as a whole? Those two statements give the same effect as aliases (more or less)
Ah OK. I was wondering because if you leave off the 'scope link' then you get inheritance of the broadcast for secondary ip addrs. Yep - that is the 'scope link' override that basically tells the sys