Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Recommend\s+XFS\s+enabled\s+Linux\s+Distribution\s*$/: 27 ]

Total 27 documents matching your query.

1. RE: Recommend XFS enabled Linux Distribution (score: 1)
Author: xxxx>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 11:35:14 -0500
I use Gentoo exclusively. It's definitely not for everyone, but I've used at least a dozen distributions pretty heavily and have phased out using anything else over the last few years. Not so much fu
/archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00010.html (9,529 bytes)

2. RE: Recommend XFS enabled Linux Distribution (score: 1)
Author: xxxx>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 11:45:15 -0500 (EST)
How many boxes are you currently maintaining? -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Lonni J Friedman netllama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx LlamaLand http://netllama.linux-sxs.org
/archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00011.html (10,541 bytes)

3. Re: Recommend XFS enabled Linux Distribution (score: 1)
Author: xxxx>
Date: Tue, 03 May 2005 12:51:14 -0500
SuSE SLES9 would be a good choice. SGI works with SuSE to ensure that the xfs code in that distro is in good shape. -Eric
/archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00012.html (8,585 bytes)

4. Re: Recommend XFS enabled Linux Distribution (score: 1)
Author: xxxx>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 14:03:45 -0400
If you go with SLES9, be sure to get SP2 (in beta right now). SUSE has a lot of device mapper (LVM2), multipath, and drbd issues resolved in SP2 from what I understand. Greg -- Greg Freemyer The Norc
/archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00014.html (9,736 bytes)

5. Re: Recommend XFS enabled Linux Distribution (score: 1)
Author: xxxx>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 21:02:26 +0200
could you me point to some details regarding the lvm2 issues solved in the beta of SP2? thanks in advance, - Christian
/archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00015.html (9,989 bytes)

6. Re: Recommend XFS enabled Linux Distribution (score: 1)
Author: xxxx>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 15:16:00 -0400
LVM2 is the userspace counterpart of the kernel DM (device mapper). I am not aware of any userspace issues, but I believe that a DM issues have been fixed and SuSE did a complete audit of the DM mult
/archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00016.html (11,176 bytes)

7. Re: Recommend XFS enabled Linux Distribution (score: 1)
Author: xxxx>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 09:42:32 +0200 (CEST)
What about SUSE prof. 9.3 ? Roberto
/archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00017.html (8,825 bytes)

8. Re: Recommend XFS enabled Linux Distribution (score: 1)
Author: xxxx>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 10:00:31 +0200
* zwlu@xxxxxxxxxxx <zwlu@xxxxxxxxxxx>: Ah, we have those boxes as well. We run Debian. The sarge installer offers XFS as a choice. -- Ralf Hildebrandt (i.A. des IT-Zentrums) Ralf.Hildebrandt@xxxxxxxx
/archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00018.html (8,666 bytes)

9. RE: Recommend XFS enabled Linux Distribution (score: 1)
Author: xxxx>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 10:10:43 -0500
Just three Gentoo servers, a few windows 2003 servers, and a lot of Windows and Gentoo workstations. Our department has several additional Gentoo servers managed by other staff, and across campus th
/archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00020.html (11,931 bytes)

10. RE: Recommend XFS enabled Linux Distribution (score: 1)
Author: ser@xxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 11:35:14 -0500
I use Gentoo exclusively. It's definitely not for everyone, but I've used at least a dozen distributions pretty heavily and have phased out using anything else over the last few years. Not so much fu
/archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00211.html (9,529 bytes)

11. RE: Recommend XFS enabled Linux Distribution (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 11:45:15 -0500 (EST)
How many boxes are you currently maintaining? -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Lonni J Friedman netllama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx LlamaLand http://netllama.linux-sxs.org
/archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00212.html (10,541 bytes)

12. Re: Recommend XFS enabled Linux Distribution (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 03 May 2005 12:51:14 -0500
SuSE SLES9 would be a good choice. SGI works with SuSE to ensure that the xfs code in that distro is in good shape. -Eric
/archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00213.html (8,585 bytes)

13. Re: Recommend XFS enabled Linux Distribution (score: 1)
Author: en@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 14:03:45 -0400
If you go with SLES9, be sure to get SP2 (in beta right now). SUSE has a lot of device mapper (LVM2), multipath, and drbd issues resolved in SP2 from what I understand. Greg -- Greg Freemyer The Norc
/archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00215.html (9,736 bytes)

14. Re: Recommend XFS enabled Linux Distribution (score: 1)
Author: @xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 21:02:26 +0200
could you me point to some details regarding the lvm2 issues solved in the beta of SP2? thanks in advance, - Christian
/archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00216.html (9,989 bytes)

15. Re: Recommend XFS enabled Linux Distribution (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 15:16:00 -0400
LVM2 is the userspace counterpart of the kernel DM (device mapper). I am not aware of any userspace issues, but I believe that a DM issues have been fixed and SuSE did a complete audit of the DM mult
/archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00217.html (11,176 bytes)

16. Re: Recommend XFS enabled Linux Distribution (score: 1)
Author: @xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 09:42:32 +0200 (CEST)
What about SUSE prof. 9.3 ? Roberto
/archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00218.html (8,825 bytes)

17. Re: Recommend XFS enabled Linux Distribution (score: 1)
Author: o@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 10:00:31 +0200
* zwlu@xxxxxxxxxxx <zwlu@xxxxxxxxxxx>: Ah, we have those boxes as well. We run Debian. The sarge installer offers XFS as a choice. -- Ralf Hildebrandt (i.A. des IT-Zentrums) Ralf.Hildebrandt@xxxxxxxx
/archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00219.html (8,666 bytes)

18. RE: Recommend XFS enabled Linux Distribution (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 10:10:43 -0500
Just three Gentoo servers, a few windows 2003 servers, and a lot of Windows and Gentoo workstations. Our department has several additional Gentoo servers managed by other staff, and across campus th
/archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00221.html (11,931 bytes)

19. RE: Recommend XFS enabled Linux Distribution (score: 1)
Author: "Wilkins, Vern" <vwilkins@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 11:35:14 -0500
I use Gentoo exclusively. It's definitely not for everyone, but I've used at least a dozen distributions pretty heavily and have phased out using anything else over the last few years. Not so much fu
/archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00412.html (9,528 bytes)

20. RE: Recommend XFS enabled Linux Distribution (score: 1)
Author: Net Llama! <netllama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 11:45:15 -0500 (EST)
How many boxes are you currently maintaining? -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Lonni J Friedman netllama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx LlamaLand http://netllama.linux-sxs.org
/archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00413.html (10,651 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu