Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*RHEL\s+4\s+\-\-\s+how\s+build\s+kernel\s+with\s+xfs\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*RHEL\s+4\s+\-\-\s+how\s+build\s+kernel\s+with\s+xfs\?\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. ping on Linux/XFS/i386? (score: 1): Author: <nathans@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 21:23:56 -0800; Hi all, I've searched, but have found no good information regarding xfs on rhel 4. I'm building a multi-TB fileserver on which I'd like to run xfs. As you may know, RHEL comes without xfs enabled in; /archives/xfs/2005-03/msg00179.html (8,220 bytes)
2. build kernel with xfs? (score: 1): Author: y@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 01:13:45 -0500; a) fair enough b) I think RedHat are wrong eg. bonnie++'s over GigE and NFS to SMP server with 11-disk 3ware raid5 sees significantly better block reads and writes with XFS: Version 1.03 --Sequential; /archives/xfs/2005-03/msg00180.html (9,833 bytes)
3. ttributes by namespace? (score: 1): Author: gc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 13:00:38 -0800; A quick question for anyone who knows: Is 4kstacks still a problem for the xfs in kernel 2.6.11? If not, then at what kernel release did it stop being a problem? RHEL 4 has 2.6.9, and none of its pat; /archives/xfs/2005-03/msg00186.html (9,643 bytes)
4. build kernel with xfs? (score: 1): Author: y@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 16:07:49 -0500 (EST); Funny you should ask, cause there was a thread on this just last week (or maybe the week before, i forget). The general consensus is that 4k is ok for light, low intensity (no NFS, LVM, etc) usage, b; /archives/xfs/2005-03/msg00187.html (10,642 bytes)
5. HES 3 (score: 1): Author: <sandeen@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 16:06:17 -0600; You can probably actually rebuild xfs as an out-of-tree module; I had some success taking the fs/xfs code from SLES9 SP1 and tweaking it to build against a RHEL4 kernel - no kernel rebuild required..; /archives/xfs/2005-03/msg00193.html (9,327 bytes)
6. build kernel with xfs? (score: 1): Author: <sandeen@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 17:16:24 -0500; The most disturbing thing about bonnie++ numbers isn't XFS related - the 'rewrite' speed in 2.6 is dreadful - it's about 6x less than a 2.4 kernel!!! I think it's a NFS client problem as a 2.4 client; /archives/xfs/2005-03/msg00194.html (9,773 bytes)
7. build kernel with xfs? (score: 1): Author: @xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 01:38:23 +0200; just another success story: i have CONFIG_4KSTACKS=y on two machines with 2.6.11(.4) and no problems so far. - -- BOFH excuse #141: disks spinning backwards - toggle the hemisphere jumper. --BEGIN PG; /archives/xfs/2005-03/msg00195.html (8,948 bytes)
8. 33454 - fix nlink_t use (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 20:23:53 -0800; Net Llama! wrote on Thursday 31 March 2005 13:07: Now that you pointed me to it (thanks!), I found it: http://oss.sgi.com/archives/linux-xfs/2005-03/msg00047.html I think your summary is correct, but; /archives/xfs/2005-03/msg00205.html (9,835 bytes)
9. irectory link count wrapping on Linux/XFS/i386? (score: 1): Author: xxxxx>; Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 21:23:56 -0800; Hi all, I've searched, but have found no good information regarding xfs on rhel 4. I'm building a multi-TB fileserver on which I'd like to run xfs. As you may know, RHEL comes without xfs enabled in; /archives/xfs/2005-03/msg00385.html (8,220 bytes)
10. /XFS/i386? (score: 1): Author: David Kewley <kewley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 01:13:45 -0500; a) fair enough b) I think RedHat are wrong eg. bonnie++'s over GigE and NFS to SMP server with 11-disk 3ware raid5 sees significantly better block reads and writes with XFS: Version 1.03 --Sequential; /archives/xfs/2005-03/msg00386.html (9,833 bytes)
11. inux-xfs list extended attributes by namespace? (score: 1): Author: ig Rodrigues <rodrigc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 13:00:38 -0800; A quick question for anyone who knows: Is 4kstacks still a problem for the xfs in kernel 2.6.11? If not, then at what kernel release did it stop being a problem? RHEL 4 has 2.6.9, and none of its pat; /archives/xfs/2005-03/msg00392.html (9,643 bytes)
12. space? (score: 1): Author: David Kewley <kewley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 16:07:49 -0500 (EST); Funny you should ask, cause there was a thread on this just last week (or maybe the week before, i forget). The general consensus is that 4k is ok for light, low intensity (no NFS, LVM, etc) usage, b; /archives/xfs/2005-03/msg00393.html (10,642 bytes)
13. S on RHES 3 (score: 1): Author: xxxxx>; Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 16:06:17 -0600; You can probably actually rebuild xfs as an out-of-tree module; I had some success taking the fs/xfs code from SLES9 SP1 and tweaking it to build against a RHEL4 kernel - no kernel rebuild required..; /archives/xfs/2005-03/msg00399.html (9,327 bytes)
14. RHES 3 (score: 1): Author: xxxxx>; Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 17:16:24 -0500; The most disturbing thing about bonnie++ numbers isn't XFS related - the 'rewrite' speed in 2.6 is dreadful - it's about 6x less than a 2.4 kernel!!! I think it's a NFS client problem as a 2.4 client; /archives/xfs/2005-03/msg00400.html (9,773 bytes)
15. h xfs? (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 01:38:23 +0200; just another success story: i have CONFIG_4KSTACKS=y on two machines with 2.6.11(.4) and no problems so far. - -- BOFH excuse #141: disks spinning backwards - toggle the hemisphere jumper. --BEGIN PG; /archives/xfs/2005-03/msg00401.html (8,948 bytes)
16. tes by namespace? (score: 1): Author: ott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 20:23:53 -0800; Net Llama! wrote on Thursday 31 March 2005 13:07: Now that you pointed me to it (thanks!), I found it: http://oss.sgi.com/archives/linux-xfs/2005-03/msg00047.html I think your summary is correct, but; /archives/xfs/2005-03/msg00411.html (9,835 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 16
Page: [1]