Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*RH\s+7\.1\s+installer\s+errors\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*RH\s+7\.1\s+installer\s+errors\s*$/: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. RH 7.1 installer errors (score: 1): Author: Michael Steigman <steigman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 01 May 2001 09:33:28 -0400; Both the test3 and test2 isos bomb out after using disk druid (when I hit the "next" button) to partition 2 40GB drives. I haven't tried test1. I am trying to configure and install onto RAID 1. The o; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg00000.html (19,512 bytes)
2. Re: RH 7.1 installer errors (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 01 May 2001 11:20:33 -0500; Hi Michael - Sorry about that, anaconda does a lot of mix-n-match on variable names - "fsystem" should have been "fsType" in this case. :) Can you grab this floppy image: http://lager.dyndns.org/raid; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg00004.html (9,116 bytes)
3. Re: RH 7.1 installer errors (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 01 May 2001 15:03:21 -0500; You can also pass "devfs=nomount" to get around devfs for now, but surely there's a way to make raid work with devfs. -Eric -- Eric Sandeen XFS for Linux http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs sandeen@xxxxx; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg00010.html (8,542 bytes)
4. Re: RH 7.1 installer errors (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 01 May 2001 14:21:29 -0500; Ack, I knew that, typing too fast. Sorry... Hm... hopefully Martin or Russell can speak to this - I don't have any raid machines here, and have not ever tested it... Could this be a devfs thing? Has; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg00012.html (8,729 bytes)
5. Re: RH 7.1 installer errors (score: 1): Author: "Martin K. Petersen" <mkp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 01 May 2001 17:00:48 -0400; That's probably the case, yes. -- Martin K. Petersen, Principal Linux Consultant, Linuxcare, Inc. mkp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, http://www.linuxcare.com/ SGI XFS for Linux Developer, http://oss.sgi.com/project; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg00014.html (9,619 bytes)
6. Re: RH 7.1 installer errors (score: 1): Author: Michael Steigman <steigman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 01 May 2001 15:15:00 -0400; Slight correction to your instructions - type "linux updates" ;-) The installation went fine after loading the update disk. However, upon reboot, raidautorun reports "failed to open /dev/md0" which; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg00016.html (9,959 bytes)
7. Re: RH 7.1 installer errors (score: 1): Author: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 01 May 2001 19:03:30 -0400; Wouldn't this be before / is mounted? so it probably doesn't matter if /dev/ is real or devfs. How does the kernel find and mount / if it is an md device? the dev_id is usually part of the lilo boot; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg00026.html (9,919 bytes)
8. Re: RH 7.1 installer errors (score: 1): Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 01:47:12 +0200 (CEST); Do you have a initrdimage for inserting the md modules? AFAIk they were also modular on redhat kernels. I managed to make the server I admin 100Km away unbootable after forgetting to compile raid 1 s; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg00029.html (9,632 bytes)
9. Re: RH 7.1 installer errors (score: 1): Author: Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 1 May 2001 18:57:45 -0500 (CDT); Hmm...as far as I know you MUST compile in the md support if you want to have / or /boot useable if they are md/lvm devices. -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-796-; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg00030.html (10,381 bytes)
10. Re: RH 7.1 installer errors (score: 1): Author: Michael Steigman <steigman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 01 May 2001 21:05:37 -0400; I was able to boot the system by passing "devfs=nomount" to the kernel so the panic was devfs related. Otherwise, things are going swimmingly - the RAID devices synced up fine and performance seems g; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg00039.html (9,246 bytes)
11. RH 7.1 installer errors (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 01 May 2001 09:33:28 -0400; Both the test3 and test2 isos bomb out after using disk druid (when I hit the "next" button) to partition 2 40GB drives. I haven't tried test1. I am trying to configure and install onto RAID 1. The o; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg01364.html (19,512 bytes)
12. Re: RH 7.1 installer errors (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 01 May 2001 11:20:33 -0500; Hi Michael - Sorry about that, anaconda does a lot of mix-n-match on variable names - "fsystem" should have been "fsType" in this case. :) Can you grab this floppy image: http://lager.dyndns.org/raid; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg01368.html (9,116 bytes)
13. Re: RH 7.1 installer errors (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 01 May 2001 15:03:21 -0500; You can also pass "devfs=nomount" to get around devfs for now, but surely there's a way to make raid work with devfs. -Eric -- Eric Sandeen XFS for Linux http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs sandeen@xxxxx; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg01374.html (8,542 bytes)
14. Re: RH 7.1 installer errors (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 01 May 2001 14:21:29 -0500; Ack, I knew that, typing too fast. Sorry... Hm... hopefully Martin or Russell can speak to this - I don't have any raid machines here, and have not ever tested it... Could this be a devfs thing? Has; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg01376.html (8,729 bytes)
15. Re: RH 7.1 installer errors (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 01 May 2001 17:00:48 -0400; That's probably the case, yes. -- Martin K. Petersen, Principal Linux Consultant, Linuxcare, Inc. mkp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, http://www.linuxcare.com/ SGI XFS for Linux Developer, http://oss.sgi.com/project; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg01378.html (9,619 bytes)
16. Re: RH 7.1 installer errors (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 01 May 2001 15:15:00 -0400; Slight correction to your instructions - type "linux updates" ;-) The installation went fine after loading the update disk. However, upon reboot, raidautorun reports "failed to open /dev/md0" which; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg01380.html (9,959 bytes)
17. Re: RH 7.1 installer errors (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 01 May 2001 19:03:30 -0400; Wouldn't this be before / is mounted? so it probably doesn't matter if /dev/ is real or devfs. How does the kernel find and mount / if it is an md device? the dev_id is usually part of the lilo boot; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg01390.html (9,919 bytes)
18. Re: RH 7.1 installer errors (score: 1): Author: e@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 01:47:12 +0200 (CEST); Do you have a initrdimage for inserting the md modules? AFAIk they were also modular on redhat kernels. I managed to make the server I admin 100Km away unbootable after forgetting to compile raid 1 s; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg01393.html (9,632 bytes)
19. Re: RH 7.1 installer errors (score: 1): Author: e@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 1 May 2001 18:57:45 -0500 (CDT); Hmm...as far as I know you MUST compile in the md support if you want to have / or /boot useable if they are md/lvm devices. -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-796-; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg01394.html (10,381 bytes)
20. Re: RH 7.1 installer errors (score: 1): Author: een@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 01 May 2001 21:05:37 -0400; I was able to boot the system by passing "devfs=nomount" to the kernel so the panic was devfs related. Otherwise, things are going swimmingly - the RAID devices synced up fine and performance seems g; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg01403.html (9,246 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1]