Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*RFC\:\s+p\&p\s+ipsec\s+without\s+authentication\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*RFC\:\s+p\&p\s+ipsec\s+without\s+authentication\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. RFC: p&p ipsec without authentication (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2002 18:34:06 -0200 (BRST); I've got a crazy idea. I know it's not secure, but I think it'll add some security against certain attacks, while being non-effective against some others. The idea I have is letting the ipsec layer; /archives/netdev/2002-12/msg00092.html (8,453 bytes)
2. Re: RFC: p&p ipsec without authentication (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 10:59:10 +1300; It's not crazy at all. Perfectly practical, now that lots of people have fast enough machines and slow enough connections that it won't drive them mad with the performance issues :-) Actually, it can; /archives/netdev/2002-12/msg00093.html (10,923 bytes)
3. RFC: p&p ipsec without authentication (score: 1): Author: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2002 18:34:06 -0200 (BRST); Hi, I've got a crazy idea. I know it's not secure, but I think it'll add some security against certain attacks, while being non-effective against some others. The idea I have is letting the ipsec lay; /archives/netdev/2002-12/msg00237.html (8,498 bytes)
4. Re: RFC: p&p ipsec without authentication (score: 1): Author: Andrew McGregor <andrew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 10:59:10 +1300; It's not crazy at all. Perfectly practical, now that lots of people have fast enough machines and slow enough connections that it won't drive them mad with the performance issues :-) Actually, it can; /archives/netdev/2002-12/msg00238.html (10,959 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]