Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*RFC\:\s+Reporting\s+dropped\s+packets\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. RFC: Reporting dropped packets (score: 1)
Author: xxxx>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2000 17:59:59 +1000
There are a number of places in the network code where we drop packets which people might be interested in knowing about (eg. my nat code, CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_VERBOSE). Be very nice if these were more fl
/archives/netdev/2000-06/msg00241.html (7,339 bytes)

2. Re: RFC: Reporting dropped packets (score: 1)
Author: xxxx>
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2000 03:37:48 +0000
Does this affect drivers? Incoming packes dropped due to OOM, outgoing due to error recovery.
/archives/netdev/2000-06/msg00244.html (7,258 bytes)

3. Re: RFC: Reporting dropped packets (score: 1)
Author: xxxx>
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2000 16:42:39 +1000
No, only systematic (`interesting') *IP* packet drops, not random ones. Trying to cover all packet drops was my original mistake, and is fairly useless (turns out that `drop' is a vague definition: d
/archives/netdev/2000-06/msg00245.html (7,549 bytes)

4. RFC: Reporting dropped packets (score: 1)
Author: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2000 17:59:59 +1000
There are a number of places in the network code where we drop packets which people might be interested in knowing about (eg. my nat code, CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_VERBOSE). Be very nice if these were more fl
/archives/netdev/2000-06/msg00540.html (7,339 bytes)

5. Re: RFC: Reporting dropped packets (score: 1)
Author: Andrew Morton <andrewm@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2000 03:37:48 +0000
Does this affect drivers? Incoming packes dropped due to OOM, outgoing due to error recovery.
/archives/netdev/2000-06/msg00543.html (7,318 bytes)

6. Re: RFC: Reporting dropped packets (score: 1)
Author: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2000 16:42:39 +1000
No, only systematic (`interesting') *IP* packet drops, not random ones. Trying to cover all packet drops was my original mistake, and is fairly useless (turns out that `drop' is a vague definition: d
/archives/netdev/2000-06/msg00544.html (7,573 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu