Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*RFC\:\s+\[1\/2\]\s+PPP\s+MPPE\s+module\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*RFC\:\s+\[1\/2\]\s+PPP\s+MPPE\s+module\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. RFC: [1/2] PPP MPPE module (score: 1): Author: enkatesan@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 11:12:42 -0500; Of course, that subject should have been [0,1,2/2], not of 3. -- Matt Domsch Sr. Software Engineer, Lead Engineer Dell Linux Solutions linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux Linux on Dell mailing lists; /archives/netdev/2004-06/msg00544.html (17,268 bytes)
2. Re: RFC: [1/2] PPP MPPE module (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 17:15:58 +0100; Last time I talked to Paul on MPPE he didn't like those hacks in the ppp core. --end quoted text--; /archives/netdev/2004-06/msg00618.html (17,780 bytes)
3. Re: RFC: [1/2] PPP MPPE module (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 11:39:20 -0500; Adding the linux-ppp list to the discussion. Rather than have code in ppp_generic.c testing for CI_MPPE and doing code conditionally (which I agree was ugly), how about adding two new fields to struc; /archives/netdev/2004-06/msg00619.html (14,169 bytes)
4. RFC: [1/2] PPP MPPE module (score: 1): Author: Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 11:12:42 -0500; Of course, that subject should have been [0,1,2/2], not of 3. -- Matt Domsch Sr. Software Engineer, Lead Engineer Dell Linux Solutions linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux Linux on Dell mailing lists; /archives/netdev/2004-06/msg01428.html (17,343 bytes)
5. Re: RFC: [1/2] PPP MPPE module (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 17:15:58 +0100; Last time I talked to Paul on MPPE he didn't like those hacks in the ppp core. --end quoted text--; /archives/netdev/2004-06/msg01502.html (17,870 bytes)
6. Re: RFC: [1/2] PPP MPPE module (score: 1): Author: Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 11:39:20 -0500; Adding the linux-ppp list to the discussion. Rather than have code in ppp_generic.c testing for CI_MPPE and doing code conditionally (which I agree was ugly), how about adding two new fields to struc; /archives/netdev/2004-06/msg01503.html (14,304 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]