Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*REVIEW\:\s+Fix\s+for\s+incore\s+extent\s+corruption\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*REVIEW\:\s+Fix\s+for\s+incore\s+extent\s+corruption\.\s*$/: 60 ]

Total 60 documents matching your query.

1. iprune_mutex at shrink_icache_memory+0x38/0x1a8 (score: 1): Author: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 19:02:11 -0500; http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2008-06/msg00209.html It turns out that the code in question is still broken. xfs_iext_irec_compact_full will still corrupt the incore extent list if it does the the; /archives/xfs/2008-09/msg00201.html (19,816 bytes)
2. /0x1a8 (score: 1): Author: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 13:38:46 +1000; http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2008-06/msg00209.html It turns out that the code in question is still broken. xfs_iext_irec_compact_full will still corrupt the incore extent list if it does the the p; /archives/xfs/2008-09/msg00202.html (12,314 bytes)
3. n. (score: 1): Author: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 23:45:09 -0500; Lachlan McIlroy wrote: Russell Cattelan wrote: Reference: http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2008-06/msg00209.html It turns out that the code in question is still broken. xfs_iext_irec_compact_full will; /archives/xfs/2008-09/msg00203.html (36,951 bytes)
4. t corruption. (score: 1): Author: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 17:02:07 +1000; Russell Cattelan wrote: Lachlan McIlroy wrote: Russell Cattelan wrote: Reference: http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2008-06/msg00209.html It turns out that the code in question is still broken. xfs_iex; /archives/xfs/2008-09/msg00205.html (15,176 bytes)
5. log and quotas (score: 1): Author: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 19:00:30 +1000; Russell, this fixes xfs_iext_irec_compact_full(). If we don't move all the records from the next page into the current page then we need to update the er_extoff of the modified page as we move the re; /archives/xfs/2008-09/msg00208.html (15,639 bytes)
6. 27 (score: 1): Author: "Eric Sandeen" <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 13:30:01 -0500 (CDT); Lachlan, I concur. I spent way too long last night looking at this and arrived at the same conclusion about the root cause of the problem, but didn't hae *quite* the right solution. I blame it on 2am; /archives/xfs/2008-09/msg00209.html (10,854 bytes)
7. n. (score: 1): Author: "Eric Sandeen" <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 14:28:58 -0500 (CDT); FWIW; some supporting information from debugging etc. xfs_iext_irec_compact_full: Move 1 item from BUF2 into BUF1, and compact BUF2 copy memmove/zero BUF1 BUF2 --> BUF1 BUF2 --> BUF1 BUF2 +--+ +--+ +; /archives/xfs/2008-09/msg00210.html (14,991 bytes)
8. n. (score: 1): Author: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 14:34:50 -0700; Lachlan McIlroy wrote: Russell, this fixes xfs_iext_irec_compact_full(). If we don't move all the records from the next page into the current page then we need to update the er_extoff of the modified; /archives/xfs/2008-09/msg00211.html (16,725 bytes)
9. n. (score: 1): Author: "Eric Sandeen" <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 17:20:06 -0500 (CDT); I'd agree with that, at least as far as reevaluating this packing stuff - given the seriousness of the bug when you do hit it, and how rarely it's ever hit, apparently this chunk of code is almost ne; /archives/xfs/2008-09/msg00212.html (11,621 bytes)
10. n. (score: 1): Author: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 10:51:33 +1000; Eric Sandeen wrote: Russell Cattelan wrote: Lachlan McIlroy wrote: Russell, this fixes xfs_iext_irec_compact_full(). If we don't move all the records from the next page into the current page then we; /archives/xfs/2008-09/msg00213.html (12,287 bytes)
11. n. (score: 1): Author: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 10:55:16 +1000; Eric Sandeen wrote: Lachlan McIlroy wrote: Russell, this fixes xfs_iext_irec_compact_full(). If we don't move all the records from the next page into the current page then we need to update the er_ex; /archives/xfs/2008-09/msg00214.html (11,672 bytes)
12. n. (score: 1): Author: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 10:59:11 +1000; Eric Sandeen wrote: Eric Sandeen wrote: Lachlan McIlroy wrote: Russell, this fixes xfs_iext_irec_compact_full(). If we don't move all the records from the next page into the current page then we need; /archives/xfs/2008-09/msg00215.html (16,464 bytes)
13. ATCH] Unlock inode before calling xfs_idestroy() (score: 1): Author: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 13:25:14 +1000; Here's a patch to remove xfs_iext_irec_compact_full() like Russell did in his original patch - are you guys happy with this? I'm putting it through it's paces now and so far it looks good. -- a/fs/xf; /archives/xfs/2008-09/msg00219.html (18,078 bytes)
14. dbg command doesn't increment count in each loop (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 23:23:38 -0700; I'll have to think more about it, honestly. Probably fine, but I've not looked at all the surrounding code, I was so far just looking for the original bug. (FWIW, compact_full *does* get called reaso; /archives/xfs/2008-09/msg00223.html (10,985 bytes)
15. op (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 00:01:58 -0700; Sorry I mis-read where the above hunk went... that makes sense as-is above. For clarity having the erp_next->er_extoff and er_extcount adjustments together *might* make sense but no big deal. -Eric; /archives/xfs/2008-09/msg00224.html (11,987 bytes)
16. r into log items (score: 1): Author: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 08:03:12 -0700; Lachlan McIlroy wrote: Here's a patch to remove xfs_iext_irec_compact_full() like Russell did in his original patch - are you guys happy with this? I'm putting it through it's paces now and so far it; /archives/xfs/2008-09/msg00236.html (17,131 bytes)
17. emoving the mount pointer from the AIL API (score: 1): Author: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 08:15:34 -0700; Eric Sandeen wrote: Lachlan McIlroy wrote: Here's a patch to remove xfs_iext_irec_compact_full() like Russell did in his original patch - are you guys happy with this? I'm putting it through it's pac; /archives/xfs/2008-09/msg00237.html (12,208 bytes)
18. nel 2.6.26.2 (score: 1): Author: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 12:08:36 +1000; Eric Sandeen wrote: Lachlan McIlroy wrote: Eric Sandeen wrote: Lachlan McIlroy wrote: Russell, this fixes xfs_iext_irec_compact_full(). If we don't move all the records from the next page into the cu; /archives/xfs/2008-09/msg00245.html (12,887 bytes)
19. el at line 1138 of file fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c (score: 1): Author: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 12:17:53 +1000; Eric Sandeen wrote: Lachlan McIlroy wrote: Here's a patch to remove xfs_iext_irec_compact_full() like Russell did in his original patch - are you guys happy with this? I'm putting it through it's pac; /archives/xfs/2008-09/msg00246.html (11,966 bytes)
20. REVIEW: Fix for incore extent corruption. (score: 1): Author: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 12:33:03 +1000; Russell Cattelan wrote: Lachlan McIlroy wrote: Here's a patch to remove xfs_iext_irec_compact_full() like Russell did in his original patch - are you guys happy with this? I'm putting it through it's; /archives/xfs/2008-09/msg00247.html (17,805 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]