Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Questions\s+about\s+recovery\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. Questions about recovery (score: 1)
Author: lan@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 10:26:21 +0300
I am very happy using xfs (converted everything to xfs:). Usually everything goes fine with the system but there is one kinda scary thing: sometimes some files seem to be getting filled with null's
/archives/xfs/2001-05/msg00849.html (7,490 bytes)

2. Re: Questions about recovery (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 10:50:32 +0200
I am very happy using xfs (converted everything to xfs:). Usually everything goes fine with the system but there is one kinda scary thing: sometimes some files seem to be getting filled with null's a
/archives/xfs/2001-05/msg00850.html (8,990 bytes)

3. Re: Questions about recovery (score: 1)
Author: e@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 08:49:17 -0500
This has been discussed a few times on the list. (See the "might have found a bug..." thread from this week). The short answer is that it's a feature, and specifying synchronous writes at mount time
/archives/xfs/2001-05/msg00855.html (8,159 bytes)

4. Re: Questions about recovery (score: 1)
Author: een@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 09:47:56 -0500
I should also add here that the difference between what happens with XFS in this scenario and what would happen with ext2 is that with ext2 you probably would not see the new file at all - or the ol
/archives/xfs/2001-05/msg00856.html (9,409 bytes)

5. Re: Questions about recovery (score: 1)
Author: ord@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 16:55:23 +0200
It would be nice if there was at least an mount option to truncate the files in this case to the size without the unwritten extent. The people here seem to object to the zeroes ("garbage") in the hol
/archives/xfs/2001-05/msg00857.html (9,220 bytes)

6. Re: Questions about recovery (score: 1)
Author: @xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 10:31:52 -0500
Hey, you have the code.... ;-) I suspect a simpler method of doing this would be keep size extensions to the file which are only delayed allocate in an in memory only inode size, the size synced out
/archives/xfs/2001-05/msg00859.html (9,855 bytes)

7. Re: Questions about recovery (score: 1)
Author: @xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 14:08:27 +0300
My intention is neither to unplug the machine (it would not hurt as I am using xfs in my laptop:) nor to leave out proper shutdown procedures. However, my situation is such that I have problems with
/archives/xfs/2001-05/msg00884.html (10,420 bytes)

8. Questions about recovery (score: 1)
Author: ttelan <cattelan@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 10:26:21 +0300
I am very happy using xfs (converted everything to xfs:). Usually everything goes fine with the system but there is one kinda scary thing: sometimes some files seem to be getting filled with null's
/archives/xfs/2001-05/msg02213.html (7,490 bytes)

9. Re: Questions about recovery (score: 1)
Author: nen <lauri@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 10:50:32 +0200
I am very happy using xfs (converted everything to xfs:). Usually everything goes fine with the system but there is one kinda scary thing: sometimes some files seem to be getting filled with null's a
/archives/xfs/2001-05/msg02214.html (8,990 bytes)

10. Re: Questions about recovery (score: 1)
Author: h Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 08:49:17 -0500
This has been discussed a few times on the list. (See the "might have found a bug..." thread from this week). The short answer is that it's a feature, and specifying synchronous writes at mount time
/archives/xfs/2001-05/msg02219.html (8,159 bytes)

11. Re: Questions about recovery (score: 1)
Author: Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 09:47:56 -0500
I should also add here that the difference between what happens with XFS in this scenario and what would happen with ext2 is that with ext2 you probably would not see the new file at all - or the ol
/archives/xfs/2001-05/msg02220.html (9,409 bytes)

12. Re: Questions about recovery (score: 1)
Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 16:55:23 +0200
It would be nice if there was at least an mount option to truncate the files in this case to the size without the unwritten extent. The people here seem to object to the zeroes ("garbage") in the hol
/archives/xfs/2001-05/msg02221.html (9,220 bytes)

13. Re: Questions about recovery (score: 1)
Author: tel <jtrostel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 10:31:52 -0500
Hey, you have the code.... ;-) I suspect a simpler method of doing this would be keep size extensions to the file which are only delayed allocate in an in memory only inode size, the size synced out
/archives/xfs/2001-05/msg02223.html (9,855 bytes)

14. Re: Questions about recovery (score: 1)
Author: chell <dmarkh@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 14:08:27 +0300
My intention is neither to unplug the machine (it would not hurt as I am using xfs in my laptop:) nor to leave out proper shutdown procedures. However, my situation is such that I have problems with
/archives/xfs/2001-05/msg02248.html (10,420 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu