Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Question\s+about\s+kernel\s+update\s*$/: 55 ]

Total 55 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Question about kernel update (score: 1)
Author: Simon Matter <simon.matter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2002 08:36:45 +0100
"Joe St.Clair" schrieb: Although this could work for you, it's not the way to go. The kernel should build on whatever the 'original' RedHat kernel was built. Otherwise you may always break something.
/archives/xfs/2002-11/msg00001.html (10,217 bytes)

2. Re: Question about kernel update (score: 1)
Author: Simon Matter <simon.matter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2002 08:43:20 +0100
Eric Sandeen schrieb: I'm just trying to rebuild the i686 kernel on RH 7.2. It is updated to the latest erata, which is gcc-2.96-108.7.2 and gcc3-3.0.4-1 I'll let you know where it dies. BTW, if some
/archives/xfs/2002-11/msg00002.html (11,804 bytes)

3. Re: Question about kernel update (score: 1)
Author: Simon Matter <simon.matter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2002 10:50:41 +0100
Simon Matter schrieb: Here we go: -- Enable gcov support (CONFIG_GCOV) [N/y/?] * * Library routines * ** End of Linux kernel configuration. ** Check the top-level Makefile for additional configuratio
/archives/xfs/2002-11/msg00003.html (15,256 bytes)

4. Re: Question about kernel update (score: 1)
Author: "Joe St.Clair" <ksimach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2002 07:11:22 -0500
Eric, I have both the SGI_XFS 17.7.x kernal and the 17.7.x Kernel for RedHat 7.1. When I check for dependencies of the RedHat kernel all seem ok. When I check for dependencies on the SGI built kernel
/archives/xfs/2002-11/msg00004.html (11,053 bytes)

5. Re: Question about kernel update (score: 1)
Author: Matthijs van der Klip <matthijs.van.der.klip@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 13:29:31 +0100 (CET)
What about these lines in kernel-2.4.18-17SGI_XFS_1.2pre2.spec?: Patch10041: linux-2.4.19-umlfix.patch Also I like to mention I have been able to build a i686 up and smp 17SGI_XFS_1.2pre2 kernel (set
/archives/xfs/2002-11/msg00005.html (8,530 bytes)

6. Re: Question about kernel update (score: 1)
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 08:22:15 -0600 (CST)
Hi Joe - Yes, gcc >= 2.96-98 is explicitly listed as a requirement for building the kernel SRPM, what confuses me is that this gcc version does not seem to be available for Red Hat 7.1. Yes, that sho
/archives/xfs/2002-11/msg00006.html (8,650 bytes)

7. Re: Question about kernel update (score: 1)
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date: 01 Nov 2002 13:55:35 -0600
I guess that I don't know what to say about these problems... we just don't have the bandwidth to build & test RPMs for multiple platforms. In addition to vanilla kernels, we support the latest Red H
/archives/xfs/2002-11/msg00011.html (17,700 bytes)

8. + preempt causes hangs?] (score: 1)
Author: Simon Matter <simon.matter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2002 11:37:04 +0100
Okay, I have now successfully built 2.4.18-17SGI_XFS_1.2pre2 rpms on RedHat 7.2 and they seems to work as expected. I did remove uml support by changeing the .spec file like this: %define buildUML 0
/archives/xfs/2002-11/msg00038.html (19,154 bytes)

9. !) (score: 1)
Author: Simon Matter <simon.matter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2002 08:36:45 +0100
er
/archives/xfs/2002-11/msg00454.html (10,217 bytes)

10. ble to mount XFS partition (score: 1)
Author: Simon Matter <simon.matter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2002 08:43:20 +0100
g.
/archives/xfs/2002-11/msg00455.html (11,804 bytes)

11. S trouble (!) (score: 1)
Author: Simon Matter <simon.matter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2002 10:50:41 +0100
me
/archives/xfs/2002-11/msg00456.html (15,256 bytes)

12. db v2.4-2.4.19-{common,i386}-2 (score: 1)
Author: "Joe St.Clair" <ksimach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2002 07:11:22 -0500
io
/archives/xfs/2002-11/msg00457.html (11,053 bytes)

13. : Question about kernel update (score: 1)
Author: Matthijs van der Klip <matthijs.van.der.klip@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 13:29:31 +0100 (CET)
el
/archives/xfs/2002-11/msg00458.html (8,530 bytes)

14. : Question about kernel update (score: 1)
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 08:22:15 -0600 (CST)
et
/archives/xfs/2002-11/msg00459.html (8,650 bytes)

15. de C610 (score: 1)
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date: 01 Nov 2002 13:55:35 -0600
an
/archives/xfs/2002-11/msg00464.html (17,700 bytes)

16. ge after shutdown (score: 1)
Author: Simon Matter <simon.matter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2002 11:37:04 +0100
am
/archives/xfs/2002-11/msg00491.html (19,154 bytes)

17. Can anyone give me some diagnosis? (score: 1)
Author: öfer" <dashofer@xxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 14:46:38 -0500
can do to my 2.4.19-aa1, to just update the XFS code, so our codebase for our kernels can just be version
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00725.html (8,913 bytes)

18. Can anyone give me some diagnosis? (score: 1)
Author: ksimach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 21:00:50 +0100
e <html> <head> <meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Language" content=3D"pt"> <meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" conte
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00728.html (8,770 bytes)

19. Question about kernel update (score: 1)
Author: ndeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 17:00:57 -0500
dep
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00731.html (9,980 bytes)

20. - Remove remnants of readonly-mount handling (score: 1)
Author: ksimach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 30 Oct 2002 16:00:45 -0600
nly-mount handling We were turning the VFS_RDONLY flag back on in xfs_qm_init_quotainos but that's no longer necessary, it's no longer turned off on ro mounts, except for reco
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00732.html (9,352 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu