Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Problems\s+with\s+2\.4\.19\-pre9\s*$/: 34 ]

Total 34 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Problems with 2.4.19-pre9 (score: 1)
Author: florin@xxxxxxxxx (Florin Iucha)
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2002 09:48:16 -0500
With this patch, 2.4.19-pre9-xfs compiled with Debian 2.95.4 prerelease survives a simultaneous kernel compile, cd burning, md5sums, mail reading and web browsing. This is my "heavy" workload. Thank
/archives/xfs/2002-06/msg00002.html (8,587 bytes)

2. Re: Problems with 2.4.19-pre9 (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Pfetzing <dreamind@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2002 21:24:47 +0200
* Stephen Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> [020531 13:33]: [snip] Well I use 2.95.4 as it comes with debian. I compiled _every_ XFS enabled kernel before with this compiler version without _any_ problems. Today
/archives/xfs/2002-06/msg00009.html (7,863 bytes)

3. Re: Problems with 2.4.19-pre9 (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Pfetzing <dreamind@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2002 03:02:57 +0200
* Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> [020531 17:08]: [snip] I just tested it with a just checked out CVS version and this patch, but still getting almost the same thing... For example when extracting a kernel
/archives/xfs/2002-06/msg00016.html (8,286 bytes)

4. xfs as a module (score: 1)
Author: rd@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2002 09:48:16 -0500
i Germaschewski and get xfs to build as a module again. There is now only a top level makefile for XFS. Steve The following file(s) were checked into: bonnie.engr.sg
/archives/xfs/2002-06/msg00506.html (8,587 bytes)

5. e: State D with 2.4.18, XFS-1.1 and GCC-3.0.4 on Debian Sid (score: 1)
Author: @xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2002 21:24:47 +0200
nd we considered adding support for the *xattr syscalls to glibc. Ulrich Drepper mentioned: Can you tell me a bit more about the API? Is it stable? Should we define
/archives/xfs/2002-06/msg00513.html (7,863 bytes)

6. r API question (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2002 03:02:57 +0200
s a network file system. I wanted to know where can I get the XFS client software, so as to allow access from both Windows based and Linux based clients. Thanks Pal
/archives/xfs/2002-06/msg00520.html (8,286 bytes)

7. userspace (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Pfetzing <dreamind@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 10:48:28 +0200
g file(s) were checked into: bonnie.engr.sgi.com:/isms/slinx/2.5.x-xfs Modid: 2.5.x-xfs:slinx:120544a linux/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c - 1.287 - remove the code preventing mounts of filesystems w
/archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00606.html (7,890 bytes)

8. Problems with 2.4.19-pre9 (score: 1)
Author: Stephen Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: 31 May 2002 06:33:28 -0500
tetd my kernel to the newest CVS and I noticed some strange behavior. When extracting a kernel tar.bz2 for example it takes _really_ long and every then and now it simply stops writing da
/archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00607.html (8,753 bytes)

9. Problems with 2.4.19-pre9 (score: 1)
Author: florin@xxxxxxxxx (Florin Iucha)
Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 06:58:32 -0500
ops writing da
/archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00608.html (8,541 bytes)

10. Problems with 2.4.19-pre9 (score: 1)
Author: Stephen Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: 31 May 2002 07:03:09 -0500
ed the same problems with 2.4.18 from XFS CVS from May 25. They do not occur with 2.4.18 from XFS CVS dated Apr 17. The compiler is Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/2.95.4/s
/archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00609.html (8,768 bytes)

11. Problems with 2.4.19-pre9 (score: 1)
Author: Paul Schutte <paul@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 14:19:18 +0200
tly the same compiler as appears to be the cause of the other problem. I wish we had the window narrowed down to less than 5 weeks, a LOT of things have changed in XFS in that interval. S
/archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00610.html (9,569 bytes)

12. ng ACL's (score: 1)
Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: 31 May 2002 09:46:37 -0500
ple question. Are there any ACL aware commands for linux? It seems like the simple tools, eg. cp, tar, etc. do not preserve ACL's. This throws a wrench in my plans somewhat as I am servin
/archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00615.html (9,701 bytes)

13. Problems with 2.4.19-pre9 (score: 1)
Author: florin@xxxxxxxxx (Florin Iucha)
Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 08:22:00 -0500
compiler do you use? The problem seems to go away for people who switch away from that debian compiler. Also if possible, during the pause, can you look at the stack for pagebuf_io_CPU0 a
/archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00616.html (10,251 bytes)

14. Problems with 2.4.19-pre9 (score: 1)
Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: 31 May 2002 10:08:15 -0500
and I also know that a lot of people compile XFS with other versions of the compiler. I do compile it with gcc-2.95.x for almost a year now. Would it be a good idea to have a poll to get
/archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00617.html (10,325 bytes)

15. Problems with 2.4.19-pre9 (score: 1)
Author: Paul Blazejowski <paulb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 31 May 2002 12:51:59 -0400
who experiences this problem (and is using the debian 2.95 compiler) try this patch on a current tree and see if the problem goes away please? Thanks Steve -- Steve Lord voice: +1-651-683
/archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00618.html (9,780 bytes)

16. Problems with 2.4.19-pre9 (score: 1)
Author: Paul Schutte <paul@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 19:11:27 +0200
me behaviour on Slackware 8.0 with gcc-2.95.3 and latest 2.4.19-pre9 from CVS (Linux version 2.4.19-pre9-xfs (root@blaze) (gcc version 2.95.3 20010315 (release)) #1 Thu May 30 03:35:09 ED
/archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00619.html (20,811 bytes)

17. Problems with 2.4.19-pre9 (score: 1)
Author: Paul Schutte <paul@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 19:35:13 +0200
observations were made on 2.4.18 which I checked out on 24 May. The 2.4.19-pre9 looks to be a bit worse than 2.4.18. The machine was unable to complete the bootup. I attach the whole capt
/archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00620.html (23,853 bytes)

18. Problems with 2.4.19-pre9 (score: 1)
Author: Paul Blazejowski <paulb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 31 May 2002 13:48:06 -0400
ks to be a bit worse than 2.4.18. The machine was unable to complete the bootup. I attach the whole capt
/archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00621.html (9,425 bytes)

19. 1 (score: 1)
Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: 31 May 2002 17:20:47 -0500
uilding so to speak, ie the contents of the image contain the method for making the iso? -Mike Eric Sandeen wrote: ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/download/Release-1.1/installer It just we
/archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00631.html (9,262 bytes)

20. d attributes speed issues (score: 1)
Author: florin@xxxxxxxxx (Florin Iucha)
Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 20:26:30 -0500
ttr doesn't do a particularly spectacular job here, it's been on my list of things to fix up for awhile, never got round to it though. Perhaps you could invest some time tuning it, as fol
/archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00637.html (9,925 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu