Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Problems\s+with\s+\-Ofast\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Problems\s+with\s+\-Ofast\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. Problems with -Ofast (score: 1): Author: "Wayne Vieira" <waynev@xxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 15:47:03 -0800; I don't understand how to use the -Ofast optimization level with sgif90. Given a simple program to compile and load, if I use -Ofast on the compile but not on the load, then I get: [wv@t44 temp]$ sgi; /archives/pro64-support/2001-02/msg00019.html (8,352 bytes)
2. Re: Problems with -Ofast (score: 1): Author: mpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Michael Murphy); Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 15:53:05 -0800 (PST); -Ofast is not supported yet. It uses ipa, which has not been released yet (but will be soon). Use -O3 for now. -- Mike Murphy -- mpm@xxxxxxx -- quote of the day: -- "God, grant me the serenity to acc; /archives/pro64-support/2001-02/msg00020.html (7,237 bytes)
3. Re: Problems with -Ofast (score: 1): Author: rat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Ross A. Towle); Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 21:34:37 -0800 (PST); -Ofast turns on IPA. IPA requires the use of a modified linker which is called ipa_link. This has not been part of the Pro64 releases. We have been trying for over 9 months to get the changes include; /archives/pro64-support/2001-02/msg00021.html (7,299 bytes)
4. Re: Problems with -Ofast (score: 1): Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 11:19:45 +0100; I'm curious: what were the main problems in porting to BFD/GNU ld? -Andi; /archives/pro64-support/2001-02/msg00022.html (8,195 bytes)
5. Re: Problems with -Ofast (score: 1): Author: "Ross A. Towle" <rat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 09:56:31 -0800; The development of ipa-link as a modification to gnu ld is very easy. There are are small number of changes. There were no engineering problems. Just getting the changes into the GNU source tree is t; /archives/pro64-support/2001-02/msg00024.html (7,826 bytes)
6. Re: Problems with -Ofast (score: 1): Author: Daniel Berlin <dberlin@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 13:43:20 -0500 (EST); Well, I searched the binutils mailing list for "ipa", "ipa-link", "ipa_link", and got no hits. Did you ever actually submit the changes to the binutils mailing list?; /archives/pro64-support/2001-02/msg00025.html (7,913 bytes)
7. Problems with -Ofast (score: 1): Author: "Wayne Vieira" <waynev@xxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 15:47:03 -0800; I don't understand how to use the -Ofast optimization level with sgif90. Given a simple program to compile and load, if I use -Ofast on the compile but not on the load, then I get: [wv@t44 temp]$ sgi; /archives/pro64-support/2001-02/msg00083.html (8,424 bytes)
8. Re: Problems with -Ofast (score: 1): Author: mpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Michael Murphy); Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 15:53:05 -0800 (PST); -Ofast is not supported yet. It uses ipa, which has not been released yet (but will be soon). Use -O3 for now. -- Mike Murphy -- mpm@xxxxxxx -- quote of the day: -- "God, grant me the serenity to acc; /archives/pro64-support/2001-02/msg00084.html (7,237 bytes)
9. Re: Problems with -Ofast (score: 1): Author: rat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Ross A. Towle); Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 21:34:37 -0800 (PST); -Ofast turns on IPA. IPA requires the use of a modified linker which is called ipa_link. This has not been part of the Pro64 releases. We have been trying for over 9 months to get the changes include; /archives/pro64-support/2001-02/msg00085.html (7,299 bytes)
10. Re: Problems with -Ofast (score: 1): Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 11:19:45 +0100; I'm curious: what were the main problems in porting to BFD/GNU ld? -Andi; /archives/pro64-support/2001-02/msg00086.html (8,292 bytes)
11. Re: Problems with -Ofast (score: 1): Author: "Ross A. Towle" <rat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 09:56:31 -0800; The development of ipa-link as a modification to gnu ld is very easy. There are are small number of changes. There were no engineering problems. Just getting the changes into the GNU source tree is t; /archives/pro64-support/2001-02/msg00088.html (7,922 bytes)
12. Re: Problems with -Ofast (score: 1): Author: Daniel Berlin <dberlin@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 13:43:20 -0500 (EST); Well, I searched the binutils mailing list for "ipa", "ipa-link", "ipa_link", and got no hits. Did you ever actually submit the changes to the binutils mailing list?; /archives/pro64-support/2001-02/msg00089.html (7,939 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]