Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Problem\s+with\s+__check_and

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Problem\s+with\s+__check_and_rekey\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. Problem with __check_and_rekey (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 15:20:50 +0200; t example and the; /archives/netdev/2003-08/msg00312.html (9,061 bytes)
2. Re: Problem with __check_and_rekey (score: 1): Author: x>; Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 22:55:27 +0900 (JST); +418/4a8> [...] T; /archives/netdev/2003-08/msg00313.html (9,058 bytes)
3. Re: Problem with __check_and_rekey (score: 1): Author: la <sasa@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 06:53:46 -0700; ct <yoshfuji@xxxx; /archives/netdev/2003-08/msg00314.html (10,366 bytes)
4. Re: Problem with __check_and_rekey (score: 1): Author: xxxxx>; Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 16:05:16 +0200; ? 2.7 ? other ? O; /archives/netdev/2003-08/msg00316.html (9,244 bytes)
5. Re: Problem with __check_and_rekey (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 23:09:29 +0900 (JST); ->write_seq) + if; /archives/netdev/2003-08/msg00317.html (8,711 bytes)
6. Re: Problem with __check_and_rekey (score: 1): Author: LAY Attila <sasa@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 07:03:40 -0700; ation. --yoshfuji; /archives/netdev/2003-08/msg00318.html (8,340 bytes)
7. Problem with __check_and_rekey (score: 1): Author: SZALAY Attila <sasa@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 15:20:50 +0200; Hi All! We have found a deadlock in kernel version 2.4.21. With sysreq we get this call trace: Trace; c01a9946 <secure_tcp_sequence_number+52/b0> Trace; c0256cbc <tcp_v4_conn_request+418/4a8> [...] T; /archives/netdev/2003-08/msg01284.html (9,076 bytes)
8. Re: Problem with __check_and_rekey (score: 1): Author: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 22:55:27 +0900 (JST); You must forgot braces. But anyway, I can't find these lines in linux-2.4.21 (or even in 2.6.x). Are you sure you're working on the vanilla kernel? -- Hideaki YOSHIFUJI @ USAGI Project <yoshfuji@xxxx; /archives/netdev/2003-08/msg01285.html (9,118 bytes)
9. Re: Problem with __check_and_rekey (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 06:53:46 -0700; It doesn't matter, a proper fix was put into drivers/char/random.c already. diff -Nru a/drivers/char/random.c b/drivers/char/random.c -- a/drivers/char/random.c Tue Aug 12 06:56:52 2003 +++ b/drivers; /archives/netdev/2003-08/msg01286.html (10,478 bytes)
10. Re: Problem with __check_and_rekey (score: 1): Author: SZALAY Attila <sasa@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 16:05:16 +0200; Hi ALl! Sorry, no. The patch in vanilla kernel: -- tcp_ipv4.c~ Tue Aug 12 16:01:31 2003 +++ tcp_ipv4.c Tue Aug 12 16:03:35 2003 @@ -843,9 +843,12 @@ if (err) goto failure; - if (!tp->write_seq) + if; /archives/netdev/2003-08/msg01288.html (9,371 bytes)
11. Re: Problem with __check_and_rekey (score: 1): Author: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 23:09:29 +0900 (JST); Ah, exactly. Thanks for information. --yoshfuji; /archives/netdev/2003-08/msg01289.html (8,856 bytes)
12. Re: Problem with __check_and_rekey (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 07:03:40 -0700; As I said in another email, your patch is unnecessary and the bug has been fixed in current kernels already.; /archives/netdev/2003-08/msg01290.html (8,471 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]