Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Problem\s+with\s+3c59x\s+and\s+3C905B\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Problem\s+with\s+3c59x\s+and\s+3C905B\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. Problem with 3c59x and 3C905B (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2000 08:55:27 +0100; /archives/netdev/2000-12/msg00056.html (17,043 bytes)
2. Re: Problem with 3c59x and 3C905B (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2000 21:05:23 +1100; /archives/netdev/2000-12/msg00057.html (8,961 bytes)
3. RE: Problem with 3c59x and 3C905B (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2000 12:29:23 -0500; /archives/netdev/2000-12/msg00059.html (7,621 bytes)
4. Re: Problem with 3c59x and 3C905B (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2000 20:16:22 +0100 (CET); /archives/netdev/2000-12/msg00060.html (10,105 bytes)
5. RE: Problem with 3c59x and 3C905B (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 10:56:51 +0100 (CET); /archives/netdev/2000-12/msg00070.html (7,974 bytes)
6. Problem with 3c59x and 3C905B (score: 1): Author: "Michael Illgner" <fillg1@xxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2000 08:55:27 +0100; Hi folks, I have some trouble using a 3COM NIC905B and the 3c59x driver with kernel 2.2.x and 2.4.0.testx. First of all the card works fine with Windows or with linux 2.2.18 using the 3c90x driver su; /archives/netdev/2000-12/msg00170.html (17,088 bytes)
7. Re: Problem with 3c59x and 3C905B (score: 1): Author: Andrew Morton <andrewm@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2000 21:05:23 +1100; Hello, Michael. Good problem report. You've done this before. Uh-oh. Someone has set the `full duplex' bit in your EEPROM. Bit 15, word 0x0d. 40a1: the link partner is advertising only 10/100 half du; /archives/netdev/2000-12/msg00171.html (9,019 bytes)
8. RE: Problem with 3c59x and 3C905B (score: 1): Author: <jgoins@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2000 12:29:23 -0500; He said he has a 10/100 hub (NG DS104) -- it is a half-duplex only 10/100 hub. Regards, JGoins jgoins@xxxxxxxxxxx; /archives/netdev/2000-12/msg00173.html (7,646 bytes)
9. Re: Problem with 3c59x and 3C905B (score: 1): Author: Igmar Palsenberg <maillist@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2000 20:16:22 +0100 (CET); This kernel is a stock 2.2.17 with acl patches (doesn't change anything network-related). Bootup msg : 3c59x.c 16Aug00 Donald Becker and others http://www.scyld.com/network/vortex.html eth0: 3Com 3c9; /archives/netdev/2000-12/msg00174.html (10,178 bytes)
10. RE: Problem with 3c59x and 3C905B (score: 1): Author: Igmar Palsenberg <maillist@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 10:56:51 +0100 (CET); 10/100 hub doesn't imply half-duplex to me. I've also got a 10/100 thingy, but it is full duplex. Bit that still doesn't explainn why the driver lies :) Igmar; /archives/netdev/2000-12/msg00184.html (8,017 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]