Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Preallocation\s+and\s+Ferris\s*$/: 30 ]

Total 30 documents matching your query.

1. Preallocation and Ferris (score: 1)
Author: monkeyiq <monkeyiq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2002 22:23:15 +1000
A while back I was talking about adding preallocation support to ferris. I didn't get around to adding it at the time, though the doco seems much better now and I have an application which would be
/archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00043.html (9,112 bytes)

2. Re: Preallocation and Ferris (score: 1)
Author: Stephen Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2002 13:38:44 -0600
A while back I was talking about adding preallocation support to ferris. I didn't get around to adding it at the time, though the doco seems much better now and I have an application which would be g
/archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00049.html (9,842 bytes)

3. Re: Preallocation and Ferris (score: 1)
Author: monkeyiq <monkeyiq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 08:25:53 +1000
I had a look at bmap, very nice. BTW as an aside the man pages dont document -p or -V (and -v though that one is not even in bmap --help) for bmap [xfsprogs-1.3.17-0]. After looking through xfs_mkfil
/archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00074.html (11,178 bytes)

4. Re: Preallocation and Ferris (score: 1)
Author: monkeyiq <monkeyiq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 20:55:05 +1000
After looking at the xfs_bmap code a little and working out my next move I noticed in xfs_fs.h struct getbmapx { __s64 bmv_offset; /* file offset of segment in blocks */ __s64 bmv_block; /* starting
/archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00080.html (10,426 bytes)

5. Re: Preallocation and Ferris (score: 1)
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 08:24:45 -0600 (CST)
It's still not well tested on Linux... I'll check in a fix soon for a fairly serious bug in RT - if you open an RT file and write to it without O_DIRECT, it writes to the main data device, not the RT
/archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00082.html (8,557 bytes)

6. Re: Preallocation and Ferris (score: 1)
Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 08:56:03 +1100
Would this introduce a new dependency on libxml? If so, it shouldn't be added into the xfsprogs xfs_bmap - I'd suggest making a new program based on xfs_bmap.c (its only ~400 lines or so), add the ne
/archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00089.html (8,836 bytes)

7. Re: Preallocation and Ferris (score: 1)
Author: monkeyiq <monkeyiq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 08:13:24 +1000
Ok, so it deserves the experimental tag then ;) not yet, I usually ask if there is much/any interest in patches to other folks code before I create the patch. I don't like maintaining forks of code s
/archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00090.html (9,248 bytes)

8. Re: Preallocation and Ferris (score: 1)
Author: monkeyiq <monkeyiq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 10:18:52 +1000
No. I was just going to build the xml using snprintf() not the DOM interface. So there would only be a slight increase in exe size due to code similar to the -v code being there to make XML. there wo
/archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00092.html (9,519 bytes)

9. Re: Preallocation and Ferris (score: 1)
Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 11:31:24 +1100
That sounds OK then. cheers. -- Nathan
/archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00093.html (8,965 bytes)

10. Re: Preallocation and Ferris (score: 1)
Author: Jason White <jasonw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 12:47:31 +1100
Perhaps it could be a compile-time option, thereby satisfying
/archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00094.html (8,125 bytes)

11. s?! (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2002 22:23:15 +1000
/archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00617.html (9,112 bytes)

12. ead (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2002 13:38:44 -0600
/archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00623.html (9,842 bytes)

13. ID5 (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 08:25:53 +1000
/archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00648.html (11,178 bytes)

14. nse (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 20:55:05 +1000
/archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00654.html (10,426 bytes)

15. ops (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 08:24:45 -0600 (CST)
/archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00656.html (8,557 bytes)

16. lem (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 08:56:03 +1100
/archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00663.html (8,836 bytes)

17. ris (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 08:13:24 +1000
/archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00664.html (9,248 bytes)

18. ops (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 10:18:52 +1000
/archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00666.html (9,519 bytes)

19. ris (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 11:31:24 +1100
/archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00667.html (8,965 bytes)

20. ris (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 12:47:31 +1100
/archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00668.html (8,125 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu