Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Please\s+ignore\s+the\s+corrupt\s+patches\s+sent\s+earlier\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Please\s+ignore\s+the\s+corrupt\s+patches\s+sent\s+earlier\.\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. Please ignore the corrupt patches sent earlier. (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Luis R. Rodriguez); Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 05:23:49 -0800; Hi All, I had sent five of my patches with the new mail client, but it seems to have introduced some series of '-' charecters at the end. So please ignore all those 5 mails, I will be sending the ser; /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00201.html (8,889 bytes)
2. Re: Please ignore the corrupt patches sent earlier. (score: 1): Author: Hardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2004 15:47:40 -0500; koushik wrote: Hi All, I had sent five of my patches with the new mail client, but it seems to have introduced some series of '-' charecters at the end. So please ignore all those 5 mails, I will be; /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00211.html (9,934 bytes)
3. RE: Please ignore the corrupt patches sent earlier. (score: 1): Author: as Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 16:30:33 -0800; Thanks for the excellent suggestion. We have used this method to send all the 12 patches. Note that since our mail server went down and came back up during this process, the mail containing patch3 h; /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00222.html (10,378 bytes)
4. Re: Please ignore the corrupt patches sent earlier. (score: 1): Author: mas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2004 12:10:53 -0500; Thanks for the excellent suggestion. We have used this method to send all the 12 patches. Note that since our mail server went down and came back up during this process, the mail containing patch3 ha; /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00245.html (9,341 bytes)
5. Re: Please ignore the corrupt patches sent earlier. (score: 1): Author: o) BOIE" <util@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2004 11:57:10 +0000; And References: headers to keep the mails together in a thread, please. -- dwmw2; /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00285.html (9,263 bytes)
6. RE: Please ignore the corrupt patches sent earlier. (score: 1): Author: ez); Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2004 09:55:31 -0800; All the 12 patches were sent by Koushik on Fri evening. We(Rapuru, myself) have received it. mailq shows the following error for your address "Sender address rejected: Domain not found". Is there an; /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00296.html (10,023 bytes)
7. RE: Please ignore the corrupt patches sent earlier. (score: 1): Author: ndan Arakali" <ravinandan.arakali@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2004 11:07:56 -0800; By default, sendmail puts the From: address as "root@xxxxxxxxxx". We suspect this may be causing your pobox domain to reject the message. We'll try sending the first patch to you with From: address; /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00298.html (10,659 bytes)
8. Re: Please ignore the corrupt patches sent earlier. (score: 1): Author: bert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2004 17:58:21 -0500; By default, sendmail puts the From: address as "root@xxxxxxxxxx". We suspect this may be causing your pobox domain to reject the message. We'll try sending the first patch to you with From: address s; /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00303.html (9,370 bytes)
9. RE: Please ignore the corrupt patches sent earlier. (score: 1): Author: shik@xxxxxxxx; Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2004 15:24:38 -0800; Remaining 11 patches have also been sent. Pls ack and review the code changes. Thanks, Ravi --Original Message-- From: Jeff Garzik [mailto:jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: Monday, November 08, 2004 2:58 PM; /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00315.html (9,729 bytes)
10. Please ignore the corrupt patches sent earlier. (score: 1): Author: koushik <raghavendra.koushik@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 05:23:49 -0800; Hi All, I had sent five of my patches with the new mail client, but it seems to have introduced some series of '-' charecters at the end. So please ignore all those 5 mails, I will be sending the ser; /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg01255.html (8,889 bytes)
11. Re: Please ignore the corrupt patches sent earlier. (score: 1): Author: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2004 15:47:40 -0500; koushik wrote: Hi All, I had sent five of my patches with the new mail client, but it seems to have introduced some series of '-' charecters at the end. So please ignore all those 5 mails, I will be; /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg01265.html (10,035 bytes)
12. RE: Please ignore the corrupt patches sent earlier. (score: 1): Author: "Ravinandan Arakali" <ravinandan.arakali@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 16:30:33 -0800; Jeff, Thanks for the excellent suggestion. We have used this method to send all the 12 patches. Note that since our mail server went down and came back up during this process, the mail containing pat; /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg01276.html (10,417 bytes)
13. Re: Please ignore the corrupt patches sent earlier. (score: 1): Author: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2004 12:10:53 -0500; Ravinandan Arakali wrote: Jeff, Thanks for the excellent suggestion. We have used this method to send all the 12 patches. Note that since our mail server went down and came back up during this proces; /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg01299.html (9,465 bytes)
14. Re: Please ignore the corrupt patches sent earlier. (score: 1): Author: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2004 11:57:10 +0000; And References: headers to keep the mails together in a thread, please. -- dwmw2; /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg01339.html (9,357 bytes)
15. RE: Please ignore the corrupt patches sent earlier. (score: 1): Author: "Ravinandan Arakali" <ravinandan.arakali@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2004 09:55:31 -0800; Jeff, All the 12 patches were sent by Koushik on Fri evening. We(Rapuru, myself) have received it. mailq shows the following error for your address "Sender address rejected: Domain not found". Is the; /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg01350.html (10,062 bytes)
16. RE: Please ignore the corrupt patches sent earlier. (score: 1): Author: "Ravinandan Arakali" <ravinandan.arakali@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2004 11:07:56 -0800; Jeff, By default, sendmail puts the From: address as "root@xxxxxxxxxx". We suspect this may be causing your pobox domain to reject the message. We'll try sending the first patch to you with From: add; /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg01352.html (10,689 bytes)
17. Re: Please ignore the corrupt patches sent earlier. (score: 1): Author: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2004 17:58:21 -0500; Ravinandan Arakali wrote: Jeff, By default, sendmail puts the From: address as "root@xxxxxxxxxx". We suspect this may be causing your pobox domain to reject the message. We'll try sending the first p; /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg01357.html (9,396 bytes)
18. RE: Please ignore the corrupt patches sent earlier. (score: 1): Author: "Ravinandan Arakali" <ravinandan.arakali@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2004 15:24:38 -0800; Jeff, Remaining 11 patches have also been sent. Pls ack and review the code changes. Thanks, Ravi --Original Message-- From: Jeff Garzik [mailto:jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: Monday, November 08, 2004 2:5; /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg01369.html (9,768 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 18
Page: [1]