Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Performance\s+Characteristics\s+of\s+All\s+Linux\s+RAIDs\s+\(mdadm\/bonnie\+\+\)\s*$/: 36 ]

Total 36 documents matching your query.

1. xfs_check (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 07:05:02 -0400 (EDT)
echo "Setting read-ahead to 64 MiB for /dev/md3" blockdev --setra 65536 /dev/md3 That's actually 65k x 512byte blocks so 32MiB Ah whoops, thanks! Results are meaningless without a crucial detail - wh
/archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00420.html (10,227 bytes)

2. se in 032 (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 11:40:24 -0400
1. Utilized (6) 400 gigabyte sata hard drives. 2. Everything is on PCI-e (965 chipset & a 2port sata card) Used the following 'optimizations' for all tests. echo "Setting read-ahead to 64 MiB for /de
/archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00422.html (10,407 bytes)

3. bonnie++) (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 12:40:00 -0400
Jens Bäckman wrote: On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 10:53 AM, Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: Results: http://home.comcast.net/~jpiszcz/raid/20080528/raid-levels.html http://home.comcast.net
/archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00423.html (10,576 bytes)

4. bonnie++) (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 11:46:16 -0500
The RAID 1 read speed metrics do not depict multithreaded processes reading from the array simutaneouly. I would suspect that the read performance metrics would look better if 2 bonnie simulations we
/archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00424.html (10,654 bytes)

5. bonnie++) (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 13:32:44 -0400 (EDT)
echo "Setting read-ahead to 64 MiB for /dev/md3" blockdev --setra 65536 /dev/md3 echo "Setting stripe_cache_size to 16 MiB for /dev/md3" echo 16384 > /sys/block/md3/md/stripe_cache_size echo "Disabli
/archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00425.html (11,243 bytes)

6. bonnie++) (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 15:05:46 -0400 (EDT)
On Wed, 28 May 2008, Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote: I added this in the wiki performance section. Ok. I think it would have been informative if also a test with one drive in a non-raid setup was describ
/archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00426.html (11,150 bytes)

7. bonnie++) (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 15:22:20 -0400
Justin Piszcz wrote: On Wed, 28 May 2008, Chris Snook wrote: Justin Piszcz wrote: Hardware: 1. Utilized (6) 400 gigabyte sata hard drives. 2. Everything is on PCI-e (965 chipset & a 2port sata card)
/archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00427.html (12,027 bytes)

8. bonnie++) (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 15:27:58 -0400 (EDT)
On Wed, 28 May 2008, Chris Snook wrote: Justin Piszcz wrote: On Wed, 28 May 2008, Chris Snook wrote: Justin Piszcz wrote: Hardware: Given that one of the greatest benefits of NCQ/TCQ is with parity R
/archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00428.html (11,897 bytes)

9. reetings from David Morgan. (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 11:57:30 +0200
tion. Best Regards, David M
/archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00438.html (12,556 bytes)

10. blem (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 12:22:23 +0100
Either add "inode64" to th
/archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00442.html (10,191 bytes)

11. Re: XFS: SB validate failed (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 17:08:59 -0400 (EDT)
or disks, whichever. -Eric
/archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00455.html (12,799 bytes)

12. use generic_*xattr routines (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 08:22:12 -0400
get rid of the temporary b
/archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00470.html (11,425 bytes)

13. fs_repair getting stuck (score: 1)
Author: xx>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 07:05:02 -0400 (EDT)
o use xfs_check invariably
/archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00904.html (10,227 bytes)

14. (score: 1)
Author: xx>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 11:40:24 -0400
an in? --end quoted text--
/archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00906.html (10,407 bytes)

15. s of All Linux RAIDs (mdadm/bonnie++) (score: 1)
Author: xx>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 12:40:00 -0400
ead-ahead to 64 MiB for /de
/archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00907.html (10,576 bytes)

16. s of All Linux RAIDs (mdadm/bonnie++) (score: 1)
Author: xx>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 11:46:16 -0500
tml http://home.comcast.net
/archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00908.html (10,654 bytes)

17. s of All Linux RAIDs (mdadm/bonnie++) (score: 1)
Author: xx>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 13:32:44 -0400 (EDT)
if 2 bonnie simulations we
/archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00909.html (11,243 bytes)

18. s of All Linux RAIDs (mdadm/bonnie++) (score: 1)
Author: xx>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 15:05:46 -0400 (EDT)
pe_cache_size echo "Disabli
/archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00910.html (11,150 bytes)

19. s of All Linux RAIDs (mdadm/bonnie++) (score: 1)
Author: xx>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 15:22:20 -0400
non-raid setup was describ
/archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00911.html (12,027 bytes)

20. s of All Linux RAIDs (mdadm/bonnie++) (score: 1)
Author: xx>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 15:27:58 -0400 (EDT)
hipset & a 2port sata card)
/archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00912.html (11,897 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu