Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Patches\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Patches\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. Patches (score: 1): Author: Brian Pontz <brian.pontz@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2002 01:08:55 -0400; Should patches get sent to the mailing list or is there a paticular person that should get them? Brian; /archives/xfs/2002-09/msg00007.html (6,378 bytes)
2. Re: Patches (score: 1): Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 17:22:08 +1000; All the XFS folks are listening on the list - if you send to an individual it may be some time before they get a chance to look into it. So, you may as well send any patches to the list. cheers. --; /archives/xfs/2002-09/msg00012.html (7,238 bytes)
3. (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxx; Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2002 01:08:55 -0400; a; /archives/xfs/2002-09/msg00492.html (6,378 bytes)
4. (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 17:22:08 +1000; t; /archives/xfs/2002-09/msg00497.html (7,238 bytes)
5. patches (score: 1): Author: Paul Mundt <lethal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 03:31:38 -0400; Is anyone currently archiving XFS patches against the linux kernel? I would like to set up a mirror but as far as I can tell all that is being posted on the site are links to the cvs repository. Als; /archives/xfs/2000-10/msg00167.html (6,838 bytes)
6. Re: patches (score: 1): Author: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:38:18 -0500; Are you looking for the ftp site? ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/download Old patches have not been archived.. since they were just snap shots of the CVS repository they can be recreated based on a p; /archives/xfs/2000-10/msg00170.html (7,851 bytes)
7. patches (score: 1): Author: Paul Mundt <lethal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 03:31:38 -0400; Is anyone currently archiving XFS patches against the linux kernel? I would like to set up a mirror but as far as I can tell all that is being posted on the site are links to the cvs repository. Als; /archives/xfs/2000-10/msg00387.html (6,838 bytes)
8. Re: patches (score: 1): Author: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:38:18 -0500; Are you looking for the ftp site? ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/download Old patches have not been archived.. since they were just snap shots of the CVS repository they can be recreated based on a p; /archives/xfs/2000-10/msg00390.html (7,851 bytes)
9. Patches (score: 1): Author: "Beavis" <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 18:29:06 +0400; Dear All Where can I download patches for kernel-2.3.99-pre2 I have a modem connection and it will take me a lot of time to download a full tree Best Regards; /archives/xfs/2000-03/msg00042.html (6,376 bytes)
10. Re: Patches (score: 1): Author: Jim Mostek <mostek@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 08:41:31 -0600 (CST); Our current plan is to not make rpms available until the code is more stable and we are at "beta". What I did for some of the demos was just tar up the cmd and linux directories and gzip them. This t; /archives/xfs/2000-03/msg00043.html (7,441 bytes)
11. Re: Patches (score: 1): Author: lord@xxxxxxx; Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 08:47:22 -0600; Jim I think he means source patches - thats a whole different ball of wax from RPMs. Would a cvs update on top of an existing 2.3.99-pre2 kernel tree work in any way - probably not because of the ver; /archives/xfs/2000-03/msg00044.html (7,950 bytes)
12. Re: Patches (score: 1): Author: "Andi Kleen" <ak@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 17:11:35 +0200; Hard. You could do it with a vendor tree in CVS and using cvs rdiff, but in the long run this tends to be troublesome (because CVS only supports a single vendor tree) I created patches for the SGI ke; /archives/xfs/2000-03/msg00048.html (7,861 bytes)
13. Patches (score: 1): Author: "Beavis" <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 18:29:06 +0400; Dear All Where can I download patches for kernel-2.3.99-pre2 I have a modem connection and it will take me a lot of time to download a full tree Best Regards; /archives/xfs/2000-03/msg00109.html (6,376 bytes)
14. Re: Patches (score: 1): Author: Jim Mostek <mostek@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 08:41:31 -0600 (CST); Our current plan is to not make rpms available until the code is more stable and we are at "beta". What I did for some of the demos was just tar up the cmd and linux directories and gzip them. This t; /archives/xfs/2000-03/msg00110.html (7,441 bytes)
15. Re: Patches (score: 1): Author: lord@xxxxxxx; Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 08:47:22 -0600; Jim I think he means source patches - thats a whole different ball of wax from RPMs. Would a cvs update on top of an existing 2.3.99-pre2 kernel tree work in any way - probably not because of the ver; /archives/xfs/2000-03/msg00111.html (7,950 bytes)
16. Re: Patches (score: 1): Author: "Andi Kleen" <ak@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 17:11:35 +0200; Hard. You could do it with a vendor tree in CVS and using cvs rdiff, but in the long run this tends to be troublesome (because CVS only supports a single vendor tree) I created patches for the SGI ke; /archives/xfs/2000-03/msg00115.html (7,861 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 16
Page: [1]