Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Patched\s+1\.2Pre5\s+kernel\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Patched\s+1\.2Pre5\s+kernel\s*$/: 22 ]

Total 22 documents matching your query.

1. Patched 1.2Pre5 kernel (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 19:02:18 +0100; This kernel is brought to you by Seth' Remarkebly Unreliable Kernel service. This kernel is based on the Red Hat 2.4.18-19.8.0 kernel with the XFS patch from 1.2Pre5 patched into it. This means that; /archives/xfs/2003-01/msg00185.html (8,188 bytes)
2. Re: Patched 1.2Pre5 kernel (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 09:04:20 +0100; Seth Mos schrieb: Seth, that's cool! Well, I had the same problem when I created such kernel rpms in the past (on RedHat 7.2). I finally was able to compile all of them like this: In the .spec, I cha; /archives/xfs/2003-01/msg00201.html (9,432 bytes)
3. Re: Patched 1.2Pre5 kernel (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 10:39:34 +0100; Well, I had the same problem when I created such kernel rpms in the past (on RedHat 7.2). I finally was able to compile all of them like this: In the .spec, I changed this: %define buildUML 0 I alrea; /archives/xfs/2003-01/msg00205.html (9,611 bytes)
4. Re: Patched 1.2Pre5 kernel (score: 1): Author: xxx>; Date: 20 Jan 2003 10:24:34 -0500; Any time I've had "internal compiler error", it's been a hardware problem. ie bad heatsing or memory. I suggest running memtest86.com's test utility. -- Jeremy Jackson <jerj@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; /archives/xfs/2003-01/msg00211.html (10,047 bytes)
5. Re: Patched 1.2Pre5 kernel (score: 1): Author: xxx>; Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 17:11:46 +0100; Any time I've had "internal compiler error", it's been a hardware problem. ie bad heatsing or memory. I suggest running memtest86.com's test utility. That's not the case here. In fact the error is th; /archives/xfs/2003-01/msg00212.html (9,080 bytes)
6. Re: Patched 1.2Pre5 kernel (score: 1): Author: xxx>; Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 08:13:54 +1100; Details please, my telepathy is not working this morning ...; /archives/xfs/2003-01/msg00214.html (8,250 bytes)
7. Re: Patched 1.2Pre5 kernel (score: 1): Author: xxx>; Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 08:33:26 +0100; Details please, my telepathy is not working this morning ... kallsyms pass 1 init/main.o: In function `parse_options': init/main.o(.text.init+0x5e6): undefined reference to `kdb_on' init/main.o(.text; /archives/xfs/2003-01/msg00216.html (10,763 bytes)
8. Re: Patched 1.2Pre5 kernel (score: 1): Author: xxx>; Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 18:44:34 +1100; You did not build kdb/kdbmain.o, kdb/kdb_io.o etc. or you did not link them in or you have a mixture of code with CONFIG_KDB=y and CONFIG_KDB=n. That can occur if you do not run make dep after applyi; /archives/xfs/2003-01/msg00217.html (8,378 bytes)
9. Re: Patched 1.2Pre5 kernel (score: 1): Author: xxx>; Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 09:05:46 +0100; ba): You did not build kdb/kdbmain.o, kdb/kdb_io.o etc. or you did not link them in or you have a mixture of code with CONFIG_KDB=y and CONFIG_KDB=n. That can occur if you do not run make dep after a; /archives/xfs/2003-01/msg00218.html (9,065 bytes)
10. Re: Patched 1.2Pre5 kernel (score: 1): Author: xxx>; Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 14:39:39 +0100; At 09:05 21-1-2003 +0100, Seth Mos wrote: Ah, I'm building this kernel with rpmbuild so it might have to do with some of the target options. Not building the debug kernels works. I just uploaded the; /archives/xfs/2003-01/msg00221.html (8,754 bytes)
11. Re: Patched 1.2Pre5 kernel (score: 1): Author: xxx>; Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 09:14:49 +0100; Seth Mos schrieb: Removing the KDB patches has worked for me (it's not enabled anyway). I have built on RH 7.2 and 7.3. Thanks for the source package. Simon; /archives/xfs/2003-01/msg00231.html (9,004 bytes)
12. Patched 1.2Pre5 kernel (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 19:02:18 +0100; This kernel is brought to you by Seth' Remarkebly Unreliable Kernel service. This kernel is based on the Red Hat 2.4.18-19.8.0 kernel with the XFS patch from 1.2Pre5 patched into it. This means that; /archives/xfs/2003-01/msg00485.html (8,188 bytes)
13. Re: Patched 1.2Pre5 kernel (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 09:04:20 +0100; Seth Mos schrieb: Seth, that's cool! Well, I had the same problem when I created such kernel rpms in the past (on RedHat 7.2). I finally was able to compile all of them like this: In the .spec, I cha; /archives/xfs/2003-01/msg00501.html (9,432 bytes)
14. Re: Patched 1.2Pre5 kernel (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 10:39:34 +0100; Well, I had the same problem when I created such kernel rpms in the past (on RedHat 7.2). I finally was able to compile all of them like this: In the .spec, I changed this: %define buildUML 0 I alrea; /archives/xfs/2003-01/msg00505.html (9,611 bytes)
15. Re: Patched 1.2Pre5 kernel (score: 1): Author: @xxxxxxx>; Date: 20 Jan 2003 10:24:34 -0500; Any time I've had "internal compiler error", it's been a hardware problem. ie bad heatsing or memory. I suggest running memtest86.com's test utility. -- Jeremy Jackson <jerj@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; /archives/xfs/2003-01/msg00511.html (10,047 bytes)
16. Re: Patched 1.2Pre5 kernel (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 17:11:46 +0100; Any time I've had "internal compiler error", it's been a hardware problem. ie bad heatsing or memory. I suggest running memtest86.com's test utility. That's not the case here. In fact the error is th; /archives/xfs/2003-01/msg00512.html (9,080 bytes)
17. Re: Patched 1.2Pre5 kernel (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 08:13:54 +1100; Details please, my telepathy is not working this morning ...; /archives/xfs/2003-01/msg00514.html (8,250 bytes)
18. Re: Patched 1.2Pre5 kernel (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 08:33:26 +0100; Details please, my telepathy is not working this morning ... kallsyms pass 1 init/main.o: In function `parse_options': init/main.o(.text.init+0x5e6): undefined reference to `kdb_on' init/main.o(.text; /archives/xfs/2003-01/msg00516.html (10,763 bytes)
19. Re: Patched 1.2Pre5 kernel (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 18:44:34 +1100; You did not build kdb/kdbmain.o, kdb/kdb_io.o etc. or you did not link them in or you have a mixture of code with CONFIG_KDB=y and CONFIG_KDB=n. That can occur if you do not run make dep after applyi; /archives/xfs/2003-01/msg00517.html (8,378 bytes)
20. Re: Patched 1.2Pre5 kernel (score: 1): Author: @xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 09:05:46 +0100; ba): You did not build kdb/kdbmain.o, kdb/kdb_io.o etc. or you did not link them in or you have a mixture of code with CONFIG_KDB=y and CONFIG_KDB=n. That can occur if you do not run make dep after a; /archives/xfs/2003-01/msg00518.html (9,065 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]